FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015091372> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015091372 endingPage "830" @default.
• W2015091372 startingPage "830" @default.
• W2015091372 abstract "Editor—During the past year I have attended three meetings on the ethics of research sponsored by the World Health Organization, the Harvard School of Public Health, and the Indian Council of Medical Research. They were all ignored by the media, although the Indian media report daily on the poor state of the health service and unethical medical practices. The recent alleged maltreatment of a central government minister who died in a private hospital in Delhi has caused particular public concern.1That medical research in developing countries is meagre and of generally poor quality is well known,2 and it has not improved in the past 20 years. Should one therefore discuss research ethics in developing countries when they barely exist?In my view the ethics of medical practice is more important. To see how the public can be safeguarded from an inefficient and often corrupt medical system and receive comprehensive health care of a reasonable quality is paramount. Ordinary people have to choose between an underfunded and inefficient public sector with its long queues, dirty hospitals, and rude staff (not infrequently on strike for more pay) and the expensive private sector, perceived as being run by avaricious doctors fleecing patients through overinvestigation and overtreatment. Many patients, understandably, turn to the more accessible and cheaper practitioners of alternative systems of medicine or even to quacks, who regularly prescribe a cocktail of antibiotics, antimalarials, antipyretics, and steroids for fever. Despite this, 80% of the Indian gross domestic project spent on health care goes to the private sector.3The medical councils, the main regulatory bodies, are generally ineffective, claiming that they do not have the necessary powers. Only one doctor (a well known actor who used his medical status in an advertisement) has been struck off since their inception. Even the Consumer Protection Act, which includes medical practitioners in its ambit, has not successfully curbed unethical medical practices because of the huge delays in its legal process.In January 2000 the Ministry of Health recognised the growing concern about the absence of standards to measure the quality of health services and that the medical community in India is not accountable in any manner. It proposed setting up a system of monitoring hospitals and doctors in both the public and private sectors. Perhaps the sad and unfortunate death of a young minister will now result in some belated action." @default.
• W2015091372 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015091372 creator A5015626145 @default.
• W2015091372 date "2000-09-30" @default.
• W2015091372 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2015091372 title "Knowledge can flow from developing to developed countries" @default.
• W2015091372 cites W1994293341 @default.
• W2015091372 cites W1994386604 @default.
• W2015091372 cites W2055538113 @default.
• W2015091372 cites W2188946657 @default.
• W2015091372 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7264.830" @default.
• W2015091372 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1118629" @default.
• W2015091372 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11009534" @default.
• W2015091372 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2015091372 type Work @default.
• W2015091372 sameAs 2015091372 @default.
• W2015091372 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2015091372 countsByYear W20150913722012 @default.
• W2015091372 countsByYear W20150913722014 @default.
• W2015091372 countsByYear W20150913722015 @default.
• W2015091372 countsByYear W20150913722016 @default.
• W2015091372 countsByYear W20150913722017 @default.
• W2015091372 countsByYear W20150913722020 @default.
• W2015091372 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015091372 hasAuthorship W2015091372A5015626145 @default.
• W2015091372 hasBestOaLocation W20150913722 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConcept C83864248 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConceptScore W2015091372C162324750 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConceptScore W2015091372C2522767166 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConceptScore W2015091372C41008148 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConceptScore W2015091372C50522688 @default.
• W2015091372 hasConceptScore W2015091372C83864248 @default.
• W2015091372 hasIssue "7264" @default.
• W2015091372 hasLocation W20150913721 @default.
• W2015091372 hasLocation W20150913722 @default.
• W2015091372 hasLocation W20150913723 @default.
• W2015091372 hasLocation W20150913724 @default.
• W2015091372 hasOpenAccess W2015091372 @default.
• W2015091372 hasPrimaryLocation W20150913721 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W1996408511 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2096946506 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2015091372 hasRelatedWork W4247880953 @default.
• W2015091372 hasVolume "321" @default.
• W2015091372 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2015091372 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2015091372 magId "2015091372" @default.
• W2015091372 workType "article" @default.