Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015146178> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2015146178 endingPage "386" @default.
- W2015146178 startingPage "377" @default.
- W2015146178 abstract "Abstract Self-enhancement and its implications for psychological adjustment were studied in a replication and extension of a study by Kwan et al. (Citation2004). A sample of 199 Finnish military cadets rated themselves and other members of their platoons in a round-robin design. Corroborating that earlier study, our measure of performance adjustment (leadership grade in an officer training program) was negatively associated with the Social Relations Model self-enhancement index. A unique contribution of this study was our analysis of the differential contributions of self-ratings and peer ratings to that association. Those results suggested that the negative relation between adjustment and self-enhancement found in this study was due more to peers downgrading maladjusted targets than to those targets embellishing their self-descriptions. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, and by the Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada Research Grant 410-2006-1795. Notes 1Another approach to the evaluation of self-enhancement and adjustment would be to consider self-ratings and peer ratings as two independent variables in a two-way analysis of variance design with adjustment as the dependent variable (Zuckerman & Knee, Citation1996). A more general approach would be to treat self-ratings and peer ratings as independent predictors of adjustment in a multiple regression context. Either way, those procedures essentially are based on the Self-Insight index of self-enhancement (i.e., self-ratings compared with others' ratings of self) and do not account for perceiver effects affecting the results. 2To estimate the target (or perceiver) effect, one cannot simply take the difference between ratings received by (or given to) the participant and the grand mean of the platoon. As self-ratings are excluded, the targets being rated by each perceiver make up a slightly different set for each group member, and this “missing partner” bias has to be corrected. In computing the SRM index, the target and perceiver effects, as well as the mean of the other platoon members' self-ratings (constant), are subtracted from each cadet's self-ratings. Thus, the SRM index is corrected for the missing-partner bias while controlling for intergroup differences. For more details, along with the computational formulas, see Kwan et al. (Citation2004). ∗p < .05. ∗∗p < .01." @default.
- W2015146178 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2015146178 creator A5008493666 @default.
- W2015146178 creator A5016631473 @default.
- W2015146178 creator A5051654145 @default.
- W2015146178 creator A5079458914 @default.
- W2015146178 date "2008-12-01" @default.
- W2015146178 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2015146178 title "Does Self-Enhancement Have Implications for Adjustment?" @default.
- W2015146178 cites W1969614791 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W1979506848 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W1999013836 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W1999754087 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2049798922 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2051317010 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2056207320 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2058778920 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2102881796 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2109661518 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2115130164 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2124023679 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2139236723 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2155648052 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2157300266 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2164087489 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2164438751 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2171975196 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2325497521 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W2914202243 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W4246395372 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W4250284246 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W4255564917 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W4297574101 @default.
- W2015146178 cites W4300920273 @default.
- W2015146178 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802502374" @default.
- W2015146178 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2015146178 type Work @default.
- W2015146178 sameAs 2015146178 @default.
- W2015146178 citedByCount "13" @default.
- W2015146178 countsByYear W20151461782014 @default.
- W2015146178 countsByYear W20151461782016 @default.
- W2015146178 countsByYear W20151461782017 @default.
- W2015146178 countsByYear W20151461782020 @default.
- W2015146178 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2015146178 hasAuthorship W2015146178A5008493666 @default.
- W2015146178 hasAuthorship W2015146178A5016631473 @default.
- W2015146178 hasAuthorship W2015146178A5051654145 @default.
- W2015146178 hasAuthorship W2015146178A5079458914 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C17235551 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C196083921 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C27574286 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C2776535551 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C2777189325 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C4994750 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C54998920 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C105795698 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C121955636 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C144133560 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C151730666 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C15744967 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C17235551 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C17744445 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C196083921 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C199539241 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C27574286 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C2776535551 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C2777189325 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C2779343474 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C33923547 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C4994750 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C54998920 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C77805123 @default.
- W2015146178 hasConceptScore W2015146178C86803240 @default.
- W2015146178 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2015146178 hasLocation W20151461781 @default.
- W2015146178 hasOpenAccess W2015146178 @default.
- W2015146178 hasPrimaryLocation W20151461781 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W1557071028 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W1703309144 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W1988279057 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W2017340082 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W2031140857 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W2092418049 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W2114773364 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W2350989532 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W2783262070 @default.
- W2015146178 hasRelatedWork W64645211 @default.