FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015203102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015203102 endingPage "371" @default.
• W2015203102 startingPage "363" @default.
• W2015203102 abstract "Background There is concern regarding the increasing rates of fractures that are being attributed to osteoporosis. It is estimated that around 60 000 hip fractures occur annually in the U.K. The majority being in the elderly, resulting in considerable morbidity and mortality ( DoH, 1998). Investigations into the causes, prevention and treatment of fractures are therefore of both clinical and economic importance.Aim The aim of this study was to compare a group of elderly, fractured neck of femur patients (female, 60–102 years, n 64) with a group of healthy age-matched controls (female, 63–90, n 45). Differences in their current dietary intake, intake in the recent and distant past, anthropometric indices lifestyle factors and food choice were all investigated.Methods Interviewer administered questionnaires were used to obtain the information necessary and three consecutive 24 h recalls determined current dietary intake (analysed using ’Dietplan’). Anthropometric indices examined included; weight, height, demispan, mindex, demiquet, body mass index (BMI), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), mid upper arm muscle circumference (MUAMC) and maximum calf circumference.Independent t-tests and chi-square were used to assess statistical significance.Results Current dietary intake data revealed that the control group consumed almost all nutrients in greater amounts. Energy, carbohydrate, protein, thiamine, pyridoxine, calcium, phosphate, magnesium, potassium, iron, selenium, iodine and fibre were all significantly greater in the control group (P = < 0.01). Although, neither the cases nor controls achieved 100% of the RNI for energy (mean values).There was also found to be a significant difference between the majority of the anthropometric indices measured. The controls were significantly heavier than the cases (P = 0.001) and had a greater mean mindex value (P = 0.001). Also, significantly lower TSF and MUAC values were seen in the cases (P = 0.005 and 0.001, respectively). All these results suggest that the fractured neck of femur patients were nutritionally compromised and would benefit from supplementation to aid recovery.Analysis of past calcium intake produced surprising results, in that a greater percentage of the cases than controls stated consuming a ’high’ calcium intake in both childhood and early adulthood. The effect of recall bias needs to be considered here. But, although these results contradict the majority of findings in this field, similar results have previously been found ( New et al., 1998 ).Conclusions Various potential risk factors for hip fractures have been highlighted in this study (including; low body weight, low muscle mass and low activity level). Therefore, in conclusion, improved nutrition could help to prevent hip fracture occurrence and supplementation of the diet is an important part of the treatment for fractured neck of femur." @default.
• W2015203102 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015203102 creator A5035980404 @default.
• W2015203102 date "2000-10-01" @default.
• W2015203102 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2015203102 title "A10. Dietary intake and anthropometric indices of hip fracture patients: a case control study" @default.
• W2015203102 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-277x.2000.00001-11.x" @default.
• W2015203102 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2015203102 type Work @default.
• W2015203102 sameAs 2015203102 @default.
• W2015203102 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2015203102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015203102 hasAuthorship W2015203102A5035980404 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConcept C2778885795 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConcept C42407357 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConcept C61427482 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConceptScore W2015203102C126322002 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConceptScore W2015203102C2776541429 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConceptScore W2015203102C2778885795 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConceptScore W2015203102C2780221984 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConceptScore W2015203102C42407357 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConceptScore W2015203102C61427482 @default.
• W2015203102 hasConceptScore W2015203102C71924100 @default.
• W2015203102 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2015203102 hasLocation W20152031021 @default.
• W2015203102 hasOpenAccess W2015203102 @default.
• W2015203102 hasPrimaryLocation W20152031021 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W1420412155 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W1606130096 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W1971326990 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W1996722304 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2006742465 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2022685515 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2048528899 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2102416222 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2126282178 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2326586548 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2365641073 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2412316720 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2413865479 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2416628301 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2580883628 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2791933839 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2999050239 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W3030335901 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W763892842 @default.
• W2015203102 hasRelatedWork W2356115782 @default.
• W2015203102 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2015203102 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2015203102 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2015203102 magId "2015203102" @default.
• W2015203102 workType "article" @default.