FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015366254> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015366254 endingPage "89" @default.
• W2015366254 startingPage "81" @default.
• W2015366254 abstract "Abstract Background: The effects of the randomized revascularization trials and improved strategies and techniques for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous transluminal catheter-based revascularization (PTCR) on current patient selection and clinical outcomes are unknown. Methods: We evaluated a concurrent, contemporary (1995 to 1997), and consecutive group of patients undergoing CABG (n = 982) or PTCR (n = 939) in a single institution that participated in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) trial. Results are presented as percent or mean ± SD. Compared to PTCR, patients undergoing CABG were older (66.2 ± 10.7 vs 62.0 ± 11.8 years, p < 0.05) with a higher incidence of hypertension (73.3% vs 52.4%, p < 0.05), diabetes (32.5% vs 23.1%, p < 0.05), active smoking (67.8% vs 27.2%, p < 0.05), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (66.8% vs 28.5%, p < 0.05), peripheral vascular disease (19.8% vs 7.7%, p < 0.05), prior cerebrovascular accident (CVA)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) (6.4% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.05), and a lower ejection fraction (48.7% ± 14.5% vs 55.3% ± 11.7%, p < 0.05). The presenting functional class and incidence of female gender were similar for both revascularization strategies. Results: Compared to patients undergoing CABG, those undergoing PTCR were more likely to have single or two vessel coronary artery disease (88.6% vs 23.1%, p < 0.001) and had fewer vessels revascularized per patient (1.08 ± 0.30 vs 3.5 ± 0.98, p < 0.001). Outcomes were comparable for CABG and PTCR with a similar incidence of death (1.0% vs 0.9%, NS), renal insufficiency (0.7% vs 0.6%, IMS), and CVA/TIA (0.9% vs 0.3%, NS). Patients undergoing CABG had a higher incidence of pulmonary complications (5.2% vs 1.0%, p < 0.05), a lower incidence of periprocedural MI (1.1% vs 4.1%, p < 0.05) and major complication (5.9% vs 9.4%, p < 0.05), but longer hospital stays (6.5 ± 5.1 vs 3.1 ± 2.6 days, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Despite higher clinical and angiographic risk profiles in patients undergoing CABG, clinical results, morbidity, and mortality were comparable to those of PTCR. With evolving techniques, continued reevaluation of indications and outcomes are necessary." @default.
• W2015366254 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015366254 creator A5000595541 @default.
• W2015366254 creator A5025021235 @default.
• W2015366254 creator A5050069755 @default.
• W2015366254 creator A5056145286 @default.
• W2015366254 creator A5056309590 @default.
• W2015366254 creator A5062758820 @default.
• W2015366254 creator A5074839460 @default.
• W2015366254 date "2010-07-09" @default.
• W2015366254 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2015366254 title "Comparison of Risk Profile and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgical and Catheter-based Revascularization" @default.
• W2015366254 cites W1976356486 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W1990002043 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2004784122 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2010038681 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2010514959 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2018744100 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2020109664 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2020906145 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2029088420 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2034718348 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2045200886 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2054793550 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2063058478 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2067110424 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2071330170 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2082783709 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2087906169 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2090792228 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2165282467 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2283618120 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2324489407 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2324745151 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2331162989 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2340389018 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W2747830698 @default.
• W2015366254 cites W4244807166 @default.
• W2015366254 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8191.1998.tb01238.x" @default.
• W2015366254 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10063952" @default.
• W2015366254 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2015366254 type Work @default.
• W2015366254 sameAs 2015366254 @default.
• W2015366254 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2015366254 countsByYear W20153662542021 @default.
• W2015366254 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015366254 hasAuthorship W2015366254A5000595541 @default.
• W2015366254 hasAuthorship W2015366254A5025021235 @default.
• W2015366254 hasAuthorship W2015366254A5050069755 @default.
• W2015366254 hasAuthorship W2015366254A5056145286 @default.
• W2015366254 hasAuthorship W2015366254A5056309590 @default.
• W2015366254 hasAuthorship W2015366254A5062758820 @default.
• W2015366254 hasAuthorship W2015366254A5074839460 @default.
• W2015366254 hasBestOaLocation W20153662541 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C2780326628 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C2780645631 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C78085059 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C120665830 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C121332964 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C126322002 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C127413603 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C134018914 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C141071460 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C164705383 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C168563851 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C2778198053 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C2778213512 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C2779464278 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C2780326628 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C2780645631 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C2780813298 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C500558357 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C555293320 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C61511704 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C71924100 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C78085059 @default.
• W2015366254 hasConceptScore W2015366254C78519656 @default.
• W2015366254 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2015366254 hasLocation W20153662541 @default.
• W2015366254 hasLocation W20153662542 @default.
• W2015366254 hasOpenAccess W2015366254 @default.

• next