FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015485655> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015485655 endingPage "183" @default.
• W2015485655 startingPage "161" @default.
• W2015485655 abstract "Abstract In recent years families entangled with drug addiction and drug use have become subjected to a myriad of judicial and medical interventionist strategies designed to remake the family into a more socially productive and self-regulated ‘healthy’ body. Working through feminist and post-structural understandings of law and different body–space relations of family treatment and recovery, in this paper we empirically investigate the nature and workings of therapeutic jurisprudence in drug treatment and child welfare management programs based in San Diego, California, and involved in the family treatment drug court (FTDC) system. What is at the forefront in this paper are different critical geographical conceptualizations of the double articulating productive and inhibiting forces inherent to the workings of FTDCs. Through the presentation of two family narratives of different familial, corporeal, spatial, and institutional encounters, movements, and transformations, we argue for alternative, attentive, and empowering understandings of family recovery. Dernièrement, les familles qui sont mêlées à la dépendance aux drogues et à l'utilisation des drogues se retrouvent soumises à une multiplicité d'interventions médicales et juridiques destinées à refaire la famille d'un corps «sain», c'est-à-dire un corps qui soit plus productif socialement et qui s'autorégule bien. A partir des compréhensions féministes et poststructuralistes du droit et des rapports «espace-corps» différents du traitement et de la guérison familiale, nous examinons empiriquement la nature et le fonctionnement d'une philosophie de droit soi-disant «thérapeutique» dans les programmes impliqués dans le système des cours de traitement familial pour la dépendance (ndt: Family Treatment Drug Court [FTCD] en anglais) de traitement pour la dépendance et de l'assistance sociale aux enfants basés à San Diego, Californie. Dans cet article nous soulignons de différentes conceptions géographiques des forces opposantes à la fois productives et encombrantes (ndt: «double-articulating» en anglais) qui sont propre au fonctionnement de ces cours. A travers de deux familles dont nous présentons leur narratives des rencontres familiales, corporelles, spatiales, et institutionnelles, nous exposons les raisons pour une émergence des compréhensions alternatives, attentives, et libératrices de la guérison familiale. En los últimos años familias enredadas con la adicción y uso de drogas han sido sometidos a una multitud de estrategias judicialmente y médicamente intervencionistas diseñados para rehacer la familia para ser un cuerpo más ‘saludable’, auto-regulado, y más productiva socialmente. Utilizando entendimientos feministas y post-estructurales de la ley y diferentes relaciones de cuerpo-espacio del tratamiento de familia y recuperación, en este articulo investigamos empíricamente el funcionamiento de jurisprudencia terapéutica en los programas de tratamiento de drogas y la protección de menores basados en San Diego, California que están involucrados en el Tribunal del Tratamiento de Drogas en Familia (TTDF). Al frente de este articulo son diferentes conceptualizaciones geográficos críticos de las fuerzas doble articulando productivas y inhibidas que están inherentes al trabajo del TTDF. A través la presentación de dos narrativas de familias de diferentes encuentros, movimientos y transformaciones familiares, corporeales, espaciales, y institucionales, discutimos por la aparición de entendimientos alternativos, atentos, y inspirados para la recuperación de familias. Keywords: spacebodyrecoveryfamily treatment drug courtslawKeywords: spacebodyrecoveryfamily treatment drug courtslawKeywords: espaciocuerporecuperacióntribunales del tratamiento de drogas en familialey Acknowledgements We would like to thank Dr Stuart Aitken, Dr Fernando Bosco, and Dr Thomas Herman for their insights, suggestions, and support. We would also like to thank the three reviewers from Social & Cultural Geography and Editor Michael Brown for their helpful comments. Finally, we would like to thank Dr Scott Burress and Ms. Stephanie Corkran from NPC Research, Inc., and the drug court families interviewed for this project. Notes 1. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health in 2006 (SAMHSA) reports 20 million illicit drug users, 17 million heavy drinkers, 22.6 million people with substance dependency problems in need drug or alcohol-related treatment, and only 4 million people who actually received treatment, of which recidivism rates range from mid-thirties to high 60 per cent. 2. In 2005, the Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse (CitationCASA), in a report entitled, ‘Family Matters: Substance Use and the American Family’, notes that ‘alcohol and drug abuse are family diseases with severe consequences for all family members, particularly children. Prenatal exposure to tobacco, alcohol and drugs is associated with miscarriage, stillbirth, sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), low birth weight and physical deformities, cognitive impairment, conduct disorders, depression and mental retardation. Parental alcohol and drug abuse increase the incidence of family violence, divorce, financial problems and exposure to crime. Substance abusing parents are much likelier than parents who don't abuse alcohol or drugs to abuse and neglect their children. Children of smokers are likelier to suffer ear infections, asthma, bronchitis and pneumonia. Children of parents who smoke, use illegal drugs or abuse alcohol are likelier to do the same’. (see http://www.casacolumbia.org/absolutenm/articlefiles/380-Family%20Matters.pdf) 3. While Deleuze's (Citation1994: 131) focus in his discussion on dogmatic images is particularly in relationship to the discipline of philosophy, and what philosophy holds as valid in respect to ‘what it means to think,’ a central importance of this critique is his challenge to the idea that thought is recognition. Lefebvre (Citation2008: 3) explains, ‘[w]ith recognition as it aim, thought is reduced to a task of identification. And, as a consequence of its drive to recognize, dogmatic thought threatens to assimilate all its potential encounters (with things, others, texts, etc.) into the concepts and categories used to recognize them.’ 4. This family narrative is derived from interviews conducted by C.M. Moreno with the father on 19 December 2006, 13 March 2007, and 22 December 2008 in San Diego, CA. 5. FTDCs, symbolically and materially, were one of the centerpieces of neo-liberal restructuring of drug policy during the 1990s that looked to further develop state-partnered community and private investments in fighting America's war on drugs. These state–community partnerships aligned with the development of FTDCs are generally observed through increased federal and state funding given to various community-based drug treatment and child welfare programs to support inpatient and outpatient treatment programs, mental health services, foster care, family welfare services such as WIC, afterschool day care programs, and a variety of other drug treatment and child welfare services and programs embedded in the community and private sphere. 6. Through the passage of Proposition 36 in 2000, the State of California mandated community-based drug treatment and probation for all first and second time non-violent drug offenders as an alternative to incarceration. This legislative move, which in many ways helped to establish the FTDCs in the State of California, was an attempt by lawmakers to respond to concerns related to California's over-populated prisons, emerging fiscal crises, and the increased number of children being placed in long-term foster care because of parental incarceration." @default.
• W2015485655 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015485655 creator A5024164846 @default.
• W2015485655 creator A5043995892 @default.
• W2015485655 date "2012-03-01" @default.
• W2015485655 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2015485655 title "Recovery spaces and therapeutic jurisprudence: a case study of the family treatment drug courts" @default.
• W2015485655 cites W115793941 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1939455452 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1964321282 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1964640828 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1967760291 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1969447199 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1972929912 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1978544091 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1979610993 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1983185167 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1989708945 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1991014729 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1992714526 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1992806751 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1993328793 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W1996830025 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2004330744 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2008329130 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2008595486 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2009549163 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2011773796 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2022396024 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2025404040 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2034365180 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W203489010 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2037377181 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2042123857 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2044186862 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2044805094 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2057667264 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2058988316 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2060549678 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2066618586 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2066838699 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2070197234 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2077984722 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2079617205 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2081631434 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2087286707 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2091026195 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2091476296 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2095900657 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2127142633 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2130567979 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2133493280 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2134088523 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2134457240 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2140167772 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2157868683 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2159345562 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2161199781 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2161448274 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2171221039 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2312220122 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2315124252 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W2334677589 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W3129802183 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W4206929019 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W4233251266 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W4245644765 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W4251102861 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W4255350697 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W4300487036 @default.
• W2015485655 cites W570474210 @default.
• W2015485655 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.655768" @default.
• W2015485655 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2015485655 type Work @default.
• W2015485655 sameAs 2015485655 @default.
• W2015485655 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2015485655 countsByYear W20154856552015 @default.
• W2015485655 countsByYear W20154856552016 @default.
• W2015485655 countsByYear W20154856552017 @default.
• W2015485655 countsByYear W20154856552020 @default.
• W2015485655 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015485655 hasAuthorship W2015485655A5024164846 @default.
• W2015485655 hasAuthorship W2015485655A5043995892 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C156352284 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C2778295384 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C2780035454 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C2986900798 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W2015485655 hasConceptScore W2015485655C118552586 @default.

• next