FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015514132> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015514132 endingPage "930" @default.
• W2015514132 startingPage "929" @default.
• W2015514132 abstract "To the Editor: We really appreciate the increased attention to data handling in the journal. For example, Guedea et al ( 1 Guedea F. Malicki J. In regard to Albert and Das. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87: 432 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar ) focus on testing and developing quality indicators, and Ciezki ( 2 Ciezki J.P. High-risk prostate cancer in the modern era: Does a single standard of care exist?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87: 440-442 Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar ) seeks improved literature through better data management (“data should be managed by sophisticated data managers”) and content-knowledgeable “biostatisticians.” This reflects the revolution occurring in data science and informatics toward increasingly larger volumes of data (eg, imaging sets), applications of sophisticated statistical methods (eg, repeated measures, mixed models, time-series), and expanding methods of bioinformatics (eg, data-mining and business analytics). Attention to these by authors, reviewers, and editors can only strengthen the journal and the radiation sciences relating to human health. In Regard to Albert and DasInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, PhysicsVol. 87Issue 3PreviewTo the Editor: We read with great interest the article by Albert and Das (1) on the need to establish quality indicators (QIs) in radiation oncology. Recently, our two institutions—the Greater Poland Cancer Centre in Poland and the Catalan Institute of Oncology in Spain—carried out a joint clinical audit to evaluate QIs for colorectal cancer. Full-Text PDF High-Risk Prostate Cancer in the Modern Era: Does a Single Standard of Care Exist?International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, PhysicsVol. 87Issue 3PreviewThere are more randomized trials addressing the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer than for any other localized risk group. There are, however, no comparative efficacy trials among the major treatment modalities. Most randomized trials examine various combinations and permutations of external beam radiation therapy and endocrine therapy. Because of this abundance of data, most practitioners cite some dose/volume of external beam radiation therapy plus endocrine therapy of some duration as the standard of care for high-risk prostate cancer. Full-Text PDF In Reply to Jones and MenonInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, PhysicsVol. 89Issue 4PreviewTo the Editor: I would like to thank the authors for their citation of my work (1, 2) for use while discussing the responsibilities of radiation oncologists relative to the broad topic of data management. They correctly state that both my work and that of Guedea et al (3) are merely highlighting two facets of a situation that flows from the problems of data handling for purposes of clinical care, cost-benefit analysis, business decisions, research, publication, and other such purposes. Most radiation oncologists are familiar with basic statistics, but this level of training is no longer adequate if a radiation oncologist is to leverage the geometric explosion of data that is upon us. Full-Text PDF" @default.
• W2015514132 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015514132 creator A5060282590 @default.
• W2015514132 creator A5077281574 @default.
• W2015514132 date "2014-07-01" @default.
• W2015514132 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2015514132 title "In Regard to Guedea et al and Ciezki" @default.
• W2015514132 cites W1524469220 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W158805377 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W1989499783 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2022993758 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2065692088 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2111616808 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2137231035 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2162960722 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2166445532 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2169793354 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2342091124 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2412395988 @default.
• W2015514132 cites W2776474505 @default.
• W2015514132 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.02.026" @default.
• W2015514132 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24969803" @default.
• W2015514132 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2015514132 type Work @default.
• W2015514132 sameAs 2015514132 @default.
• W2015514132 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2015514132 countsByYear W20155141322014 @default.
• W2015514132 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015514132 hasAuthorship W2015514132A5060282590 @default.
• W2015514132 hasAuthorship W2015514132A5077281574 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C191630685 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C2992520072 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C126322002 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C161191863 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C162324750 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C17744445 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C187736073 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C191630685 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C199521495 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C199539241 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C2779473830 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C2992520072 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C41008148 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C509974204 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C71924100 @default.
• W2015514132 hasConceptScore W2015514132C83867959 @default.
• W2015514132 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2015514132 hasLocation W20155141321 @default.
• W2015514132 hasLocation W20155141322 @default.
• W2015514132 hasOpenAccess W2015514132 @default.
• W2015514132 hasPrimaryLocation W20155141321 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W1546820302 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W1992779295 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W2053575300 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W2131860206 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W2735972601 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W2781490607 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W3112832253 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W3188994338 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W4280549562 @default.
• W2015514132 hasRelatedWork W2172314311 @default.
• W2015514132 hasVolume "89" @default.
• W2015514132 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2015514132 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2015514132 magId "2015514132" @default.
• W2015514132 workType "article" @default.