FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015622268> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015622268 endingPage "1344" @default.
• W2015622268 startingPage "1339" @default.
• W2015622268 abstract "Septic complications related to the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy have been reported in up to 16 percent of patients in major series. Management strategies are not well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of salvage surgery and to assess the impact diversion had on the outcome.Patients who developed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-related septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Surgical procedures and follow-up data were obtained at the time of hospital and office visits. Successful salvage was defined as the absence of clinical evidence of fistula, sinus, or abscess at least three months after salvage surgery or closure of ileostomy.Fifty-one patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-related sepsis were identified. All patients had sinus or fistulous tracts from pouch-anal anastomoses. Eighty-nine salvage procedures were performed among these 51 patients (range, 1-4 procedures per patient). Forty-eight transanal anastomotic revisions were performed in nondiverted patients. Thirty-seven transanal revisions and four abdominoperineal revisions were performed in diverted patients. At a median follow-up of 65.2 (range, 3 to 166) months after salvage surgery or closure of the diverting stoma, 21 patients (41 percent) had complete resolution of their septic problems. Bowel frequency and continence for these patients were similar to patients who had not had ileal pouch-anal anastomotic problems. Eleven (29.7 percent) of 37 transanal procedures with diversion succeeded, whereas 10 (20.8 percent) of 48 nondiverted procedures succeeded. This difference was not significant (11/37 vs. 10/48; P = 0.448). None of the four abdominoperineal revisions succeeded. Of 51 patients, 34 (66.7 percent) retained their pouches and 21 (41.2 percent) were successfully revised. Seventeen patients (33.3 percent) had pouch excision. Five (9.8 percent) had persistent fistulas and remained diverted, and 8 (15.7 percent) had persistent fistulas and were not diverted. Thus, pouch function was retained in 29 patients (56.9 percent).This study shows that anastomotic failure after restorative proctocolectomy is associated with a high rate of pouch failure. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis-related fistula or sinus warrants an aggressive surgical approach in selected, highly motivated patients because acceptable functional results are possible. Multiple procedures may often be necessary to achieve complete healing. Successful repair can be achieved after one or more unsuccessful attempts. Repeat procedures can be performed safely without adversely affecting ultimate outcome." @default.
• W2015622268 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015622268 creator A5016541773 @default.
• W2015622268 creator A5024603277 @default.
• W2015622268 creator A5034570091 @default.
• W2015622268 creator A5056183554 @default.
• W2015622268 date "2003-10-01" @default.
• W2015622268 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2015622268 title "Long-Term Results of Salvage Surgery for Septic Complications After Restorative Proctocolectomy" @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1508457685 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1964920913 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1965247466 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1967486224 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1968632623 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1981307968 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1981864495 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1987635110 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1994507094 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1997502551 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W1997612705 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2006818230 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2031923665 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2036854963 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2040007018 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2041278022 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2044256171 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2046902107 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2048591414 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2054256624 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2057965062 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2064805899 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2065589689 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2068382719 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2074765080 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2079689473 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2079854031 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2085120615 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2089722549 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2091194012 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2092533301 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2334617275 @default.
• W2015622268 cites W2098083243 @default.
• W2015622268 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-6747-2" @default.
• W2015622268 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14530672" @default.
• W2015622268 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2015622268 type Work @default.
• W2015622268 sameAs 2015622268 @default.
• W2015622268 citedByCount "56" @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682012 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682014 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682015 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682016 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682017 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682018 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682019 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682020 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682021 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682022 @default.
• W2015622268 countsByYear W20156222682023 @default.
• W2015622268 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015622268 hasAuthorship W2015622268A5016541773 @default.
• W2015622268 hasAuthorship W2015622268A5024603277 @default.
• W2015622268 hasAuthorship W2015622268A5034570091 @default.
• W2015622268 hasAuthorship W2015622268A5056183554 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2776341189 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2777077811 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2778773085 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2780101441 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2780479503 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C2780637204 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C126322002 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C141071460 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2776341189 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2777077811 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2778773085 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2779134260 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2780101441 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2780120127 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2780479503 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C2780637204 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C523026621 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C61434518 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C71924100 @default.
• W2015622268 hasConceptScore W2015622268C8443397 @default.
• W2015622268 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2015622268 hasLocation W20156222681 @default.
• W2015622268 hasLocation W20156222682 @default.
• W2015622268 hasOpenAccess W2015622268 @default.
• W2015622268 hasPrimaryLocation W20156222681 @default.
• W2015622268 hasRelatedWork W1863918400 @default.

• next