Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015678439> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W2015678439 endingPage "1129" @default.
- W2015678439 startingPage "1126" @default.
- W2015678439 abstract "BACKGROUND Cutaneous sutures should provide an aesthetically pleasing result. After placing subcutaneous sutures, enough absorbable suture often remains for the superficial closure. Mohs surgeons often use a nonabsorbable suture to close the superficial layer to obtain cosmetically elegant results, but using this additional suture is less cost effective than using the remaining absorbable suture. OBJECTIVES To compare the cosmetic results of simple running sutures using an absorbable suture material (5–0 poliglecaprone-25) with those of a nonabsorbable suture (6–0 polypropylene) in primary closures of suitable facial Mohs defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-two patients with 57 facial Mohs surgery defects appropriate for multilayer primary repair had the defects prospectively randomized into a side-by-side comparison. After closure of the deep layers with 5–0 poliglecaprone-25 sutures, half of the wound was closed with a 5–0 poliglecaprone-25 simple running suture, and the other half of the wound was closed with a 6–0 polypropylene simple running suture. The investigators blindly determined the cosmetically superior side of the closure at 1 week and 4 months after suture removal. RESULTS Forty-four patients (48 total defects) completed the study. At the 4-month follow-up, 85% (41/48) did not show any difference between poliglecaprone-25 and polypropylene, 4% (2/48) had better outcomes with poliglecaprone-25, and 10% (5/48) had better outcomes with polypropylene. There was no statistically significant cosmetic difference between the two closure types. Wound complications such as infection, hematoma, and dehiscence did not occur in any of the patients. CONCLUSION In primary closures of facial defects, using 5–0 poliglecaprone-25 or 6–0 polypropylene for the superficial closure did not affect the cosmetic result. Therefore, 5–0 poliglecaprone-25 provides a comparable and cost-effective alternative to nonabsorbable sutures for epidermal approximation in layered closures. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters." @default.
- W2015678439 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2015678439 creator A5028545513 @default.
- W2015678439 creator A5029920707 @default.
- W2015678439 creator A5055077584 @default.
- W2015678439 creator A5069413034 @default.
- W2015678439 date "2010-07-01" @default.
- W2015678439 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2015678439 title "Equal Cosmetic Outcomes with 5–0 Poliglecaprone-25 Versus 6–0 Polypropylene for Superficial Closures" @default.
- W2015678439 cites W2001925927 @default.
- W2015678439 cites W2069932915 @default.
- W2015678439 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01594.x" @default.
- W2015678439 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20653727" @default.
- W2015678439 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2015678439 type Work @default.
- W2015678439 sameAs 2015678439 @default.
- W2015678439 citedByCount "23" @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392013 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392014 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392015 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392016 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392017 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392018 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392019 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392021 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392022 @default.
- W2015678439 countsByYear W20156784392023 @default.
- W2015678439 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2015678439 hasAuthorship W2015678439A5028545513 @default.
- W2015678439 hasAuthorship W2015678439A5029920707 @default.
- W2015678439 hasAuthorship W2015678439A5055077584 @default.
- W2015678439 hasAuthorship W2015678439A5069413034 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C139812875 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C2778334829 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C2779662492 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C3020183897 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C126322002 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C139812875 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C141071460 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C2777327002 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C2778334829 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C2779662492 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C3018023364 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C3020183897 @default.
- W2015678439 hasConceptScore W2015678439C71924100 @default.
- W2015678439 hasIssue "7" @default.
- W2015678439 hasLocation W20156784391 @default.
- W2015678439 hasLocation W20156784392 @default.
- W2015678439 hasOpenAccess W2015678439 @default.
- W2015678439 hasPrimaryLocation W20156784391 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W135431694 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W1988645850 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W2015678439 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W2024745621 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W2031184755 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W2032705424 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W2058861292 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W2168962825 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W2285161032 @default.
- W2015678439 hasRelatedWork W4214770096 @default.
- W2015678439 hasVolume "36" @default.
- W2015678439 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2015678439 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2015678439 magId "2015678439" @default.
- W2015678439 workType "article" @default.