FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015755311> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015755311 endingPage "330" @default.
• W2015755311 startingPage "289" @default.
• W2015755311 abstract "Previous articleNext article No AccessPredatory Pricing RevisitedJohn S. McGeeJohn S. McGee Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Law and Economics Volume 23, Number 2Oct., 1980 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Booth School of Business and The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/466963 Views: 55Total views on this site Citations: 62Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1980 The University of Chicago Law SchoolPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:DIRK AUER, GEOFFREY A. MANNE, SAM BOWMAN SHOULD ASEAN ANTITRUST LAWS EMULATE EUROPEAN COMPETITION POLICY?, The Singapore Economic Review 88 (Jul 2021): 1–61.https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590821430025Craig Freedman, Luke R. Nottage Revisiting Ramseyer: The Chicago School of Law and Economics Comes to Japan, SSRN Electronic Journal 19 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3868698 Antitrust, (Jun 2020): 419–465.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119648055.ch11Timothy J. Tardiff, Dennis L. Weisman Mandatory Upstream Inputs and Upward Pricing Pressure: Implications for Competition Policy, (Aug 2018): 401–421.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-589520180000028008Janusz A. Ordover Predatory Pricing, (Feb 2018): 10600–10609.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_1778 Antitrust, (Oct 2015): 407–446.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204381.ch11William S. Comanor, H. E. Frech Economic Rationality and the Areeda–Turner Rule, Review of Industrial Organization 46, no.33 (Mar 2015): 253–268.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-015-9457-0Jason E. Taylor, Mona Moldoveanu, Jerry L. Taylor Product Characteristics and the Effectiveness of Dow’s Countermeasure for Predatory Pricing, International Journal of the Economics of Business 20, no.11 (Feb 2013): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1080/13571516.2012.750043Yutian Chen, Wei Tan A Theory on Predatory Advertising After a Demand-Reducing Shock, Eastern Economic Journal 38, no.44 (Dec 2011): 460–478.https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2011.24Nicola Giocoli When low is no good: Predatory pricing and U.S. antitrust law (1950–1980), The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18, no.55 (Dec 2011): 777–806.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2011.616596James A. Dalton, Louis Esposito Standard Oil and Predatory Pricing: Myth Paralleling Fact, Review of Industrial Organization 38, no.33 (Feb 2011): 245–266.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-011-9280-1Janusz A. Ordover Predatory Pricing, (Mar 2017): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1778-2Nicola Giocoli Three Alternative (?) Stories on the Late 20th-Century Rise of Game Theory, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1140111Eugen Kovac, Viatcheslav Vinogradov, Kresimir Zigic Persistence of Monopoly, Innovation, and R&D Spillovers: Static Versus Dynamic Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1115310Gordon C. Rausser, Richard E. Just General Equilibrium in Vertical Market Structures: Monopoly versus Monopsony, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.948809Janusz A. Ordover Predatory Pricing, (Jan 2017): 1477–1484.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_283Keith N. Hylton, Ronald A. Cass Antitrust Intent, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.239324Patrick Paul Walsh, Ciara Whelan Loss leading and price intervention in multiproduct retailing: welfare outcomes in a second-best world, International Review of Law and Economics 19, no.33 (Sep 1999): 333–347.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(99)00015-0Peter Newman P, (Jan 1998): 1–198.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_1Fiona Scott Morton Entry and Predation: British Shipping Cartels 1879-1929, Journal of Economics <html_ent glyph=@amp; ascii=&/> Management Strategy 6, no.44 (Dec 1997): 679–724.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1430-9134.1997.00679.xBrad Kamp, Christopher R. Thomas Faux Predation in Markets with Imperfect Information on Product Quality, Southern Economic Journal 64, no.22 (Oct 1997): 555–566.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.1997.tb00073.xToshikazu Kawakami, Yoshida Yoshihiro Collusion under financial constraints: Collusion or predation when the discount factor is near one?, Economics Letters 54, no.22 (Feb 1997): 175–178.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00913-0James A. Sundali, Amnon Rapoport Induction vs. Deterrence in the Chain Store Game: How Many Potential Entrants are Needed to Deter Entry?, (Jan 1997): 403–417.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60495-9_31Farid Gasmi, Wendy L. Hansen, Jean Jacques Laffont Une analyse empirique des décisions en matière d’antidumping aux États-Unis, L'Actualité économique 73, no.1-2-31-2-3 (Feb 2009): 423–456.https://doi.org/10.7202/602235arDaniel M. Bernhofen Vertical Integration and International Predation, Review of International Economics 4, no.11 (Feb 1996): 90–98.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.1996.tb00086.xSusan Gates, Paul Milgrom, John Roberts Deterring predation in telecommunications: Are line-of-business restraints needed?, Managerial and Decision Economics 16, no.44 (Jul 1995): 427–438.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090160412John R. Lott Are government or private enterprises more likely to engage in dumping? Some international evidence, Managerial and Decision Economics 16, no.33 (May 1995): 185–204.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090160302William E. Kovacic The Application of Legal Safeguards Against Predation to the Postal Services Industry, (Jan 1995): 45–65.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2784-8_3Manfred Neumann Competition Policy in the Federal Republic of Germany, (Jan 1995): 95–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0387-9_5R.David Simpson Signaling in an infinitely repeated Cournot game with output restrictions, International Journal of Industrial Organization 9, no.33 (Sep 1991): 365–388.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(91)90017-FPaul Milgrom Predatory Pricing, (Jan 1991): 574–577.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_76Alexander Larson Predatory Pricing Safeguards and Telecommunications Regulation, (Jan 1991): 51–69.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4048-9_4John S. Dodgson, Y. Katsoulacos Competition, contestability and predation: the economics of competition in deregulated bus markets, Transportation Planning and Technology 15, no.2-42-4 (Jan 1991): 263–275.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069108717458Jonathan Preston Explaining competitive practices in the bus industry: the British experience, Transportation Planning and Technology 15, no.2-42-4 (Jan 1991): 277–294.https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069108717459Gary W. Bowman, Erwin A. Blackstone Low price conspiracy: Trade regulation and the case of Japanese electronics, Atlantic Economic Journal 18, no.44 (Dec 1990): 59–67.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299020John R. Lott Predation by public enterprises, Journal of Public Economics 43, no.22 (Nov 1990): 237–251.https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(90)90032-DReuven Brenner Innovations and Antitrust, (Jan 1990): 235–257.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2073-6_13Gregory T. Gundlach Predatory Practices in Competitive Interaction: Legal Limits and Antitrust Considerations, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 9, no.11 (Nov 2018): 129–153.https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569000900110Malcolm R. Burns New evidence on predatory price cutting, Managerial and Decision Economics 10, no.44 (Dec 1989): 327–330.https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090100410Leland L. Johnson Anticompetitive use of excess capacity in international telecommunications, Telecommunications Policy 13, no.33 (Sep 1989): 223–232.https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(89)90005-0Stephen Martin Sunk costs, financial markets, and contestability, European Economic Review 33, no.66 (Jul 1989): 1089–1113.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(89)90087-1Janusz A. Ordover, Garth Saloner Chapter 9 Predation, monopolization, and antitrust, (Jan 1989): 537–596.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)01012-5Lorenzo Brown Modelling diversified utilities and cross-subsidization, Resources and Energy 10, no.33 (Sep 1988): 213–224.https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(88)90021-7Glenn W. Harrison Predatory pricing in a multiple market experiment, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 9, no.44 (Jun 1988): 405–417.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(88)90019-4Paul Milgrom Predatory Pricing, (Nov 2016): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1778-1 Malcolm R. Burns Predatory Pricing and the Acquisition Cost of Competitors, Journal of Political Economy 94, no.22 (Oct 2015): 266–296.https://doi.org/10.1086/261374William I. Kirman, Robert T. Masson Capacity signals and entry deterrence, International Journal of Industrial Organization 4, no.11 (Mar 1986): 25–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(86)90045-7Steven Globerman Predatory pricing and foreclosure in telecommunications, Telecommunications Policy 9, no.44 (Dec 1985): 319–328.https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-5961(85)90025-4J. VICKERS The Economics of Predatory Practices, Fiscal Studies 6, no.33 (Aug 1985): 24–36.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1985.tb00406.x James C. Miller III , and Paul Pautler Predation: The Changing View in Economics and the Law, The Journal of Law and Economics 28, no.22 (Oct 2015): 495–502.https://doi.org/10.1086/467098 R. Mark Isaac , and Vernon L. Smith In Search of Predatory Pricing, Journal of Political Economy 93, no.22 (Oct 2015): 320–345.https://doi.org/10.1086/261302 B. Espen Eckbo , and Peggy Wier Antimerger Policy under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act: A Reexamination of the Market Power Hypothesis, The Journal of Law and Economics 28, no.11 (Oct 2015): 119–149.https://doi.org/10.1086/467077JOHN M. BARRON, MARK A. LOEWENSTEIN, JOHN R. UMBECK PREDATORY PRICING: THE CASE OF THE RETAIL GASOLINE MARKET, Contemporary Economic Policy 3, no.33 (Mar 1985): 131–139.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1985.tb00814.xLacy Glenn Thomas Antitrust and the Issue of Competitive Advantage: Economic Analysis and United States v. IBM, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 10, no.11 (Nov 2018): 165–187.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1985.tb00503.x John M. Barron , and John R. Umbeck The Effects of Different Contractual Arrangements: The Case of Retail Gasoline Markets, The Journal of Law and Economics 27, no.22 (Oct 2015): 313–328.https://doi.org/10.1086/467067B.Espen Eckbo Horizontal mergers, collusion, and stockholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics 11, no.1-41-4 (Apr 1983): 241–273.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90013-2Oliver E. Williamson Antitrust Enforcement: Where it has been; Where it is Going, (Jan 1983): 41–68.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1874-5_3 Bibliography, (Jan 1983): 197–203.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-103480-1.50015-8Paul Milgrom, John Roberts Predation, reputation, and entry deterrence, Journal of Economic Theory 27, no.22 (Aug 1982): 280–312.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(82)90031-XAnn Carlos The Birth and death of predatory competition in the north American fur trade: 1810–1821, Explorations in Economic History 19, no.22 (Apr 1982): 156–183.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4983(82)90016-XSamuel Long Abstracts of Documents in this Supplement, (Jan 1982): 1–576.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5214-1_1Malcolm R. Burns Outside Intervention in Monopolistic Price Warfare: The Case of the “Plug War” and the Union Tobacco Company, Business History Review 56, no.11 (Jun 2012): 33–53.https://doi.org/10.2307/3114974" @default.
• W2015755311 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015755311 creator A5032814817 @default.
• W2015755311 date "1980-10-01" @default.
• W2015755311 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2015755311 title "Predatory Pricing Revisited" @default.
• W2015755311 doi "https://doi.org/10.1086/466963" @default.
• W2015755311 hasPublicationYear "1980" @default.
• W2015755311 type Work @default.
• W2015755311 sameAs 2015755311 @default.
• W2015755311 citedByCount "100" @default.
• W2015755311 countsByYear W20157553112012 @default.
• W2015755311 countsByYear W20157553112013 @default.
• W2015755311 countsByYear W20157553112014 @default.
• W2015755311 countsByYear W20157553112015 @default.
• W2015755311 countsByYear W20157553112018 @default.
• W2015755311 countsByYear W20157553112021 @default.
• W2015755311 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015755311 hasAuthorship W2015755311A5032814817 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConcept C2779242095 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConcept C2781127519 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConceptScore W2015755311C144133560 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConceptScore W2015755311C162324750 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConceptScore W2015755311C175444787 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConceptScore W2015755311C2779242095 @default.
• W2015755311 hasConceptScore W2015755311C2781127519 @default.
• W2015755311 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2015755311 hasLocation W20157553111 @default.
• W2015755311 hasOpenAccess W2015755311 @default.
• W2015755311 hasPrimaryLocation W20157553111 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W116469360 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W1507414353 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W1777785105 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W1782144669 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W2057013612 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W2358806851 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W2767063133 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W4362661860 @default.
• W2015755311 hasRelatedWork W28456633 @default.
• W2015755311 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2015755311 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2015755311 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2015755311 magId "2015755311" @default.
• W2015755311 workType "article" @default.