Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015862005> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W2015862005 endingPage "295" @default.
- W2015862005 startingPage "290" @default.
- W2015862005 abstract "The initial developmental standards for Maintenance of Certification programs proposed by the American Board of Medical Specialties included the administration of patient and peer surveys by the diplomate every 5 years. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility of Maintenance of Certification in Anesthesiology Program (MOCA) patient and peer surveys in a selected group of American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) diplomates. The design was a pilot test of survey instruments—MOCA Patient Care Survey and MOCA Peer Survey. The setting was the ABA, Raleigh, NC. The subjects were ABA-certified anesthesiologists who were active examiners for the primary certification oral examination as of January 2013. Fifty-one participating physicians in the patient survey group distributed brochures, which included a link to the MOCA Patient Care Survey, to up to 100 consecutive patients at the point of care. Fifty-one participating physicians in the peer survey group distributed invitations to MOCA Peer Survey via e-mail to 20 peers in a variety of roles. Participants developed and evaluated a practice improvement plan based on survey results. Participants were also surveyed on their opinions on the feasibility of implementing the piloted survey instrument in their practices. Response rates for the patient care and the peer surveys were 15% and 75%, respectively. Both surveys indicated a high level of satisfaction with the diplomates; approximately two-thirds of physicians could not identify practice areas in need of improvement. These results suggest that threats to the validity of these surveys include distribution bias for peer surveys and response bias for patient surveys and that surveys often do not provide actionable information useful for practice improvement. Alternative approaches, such as including anesthesiologists within an integrated institutional evaluation system, could be explored to maximize the benefits of physician assessments provided by peers and patients." @default.
- W2015862005 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2015862005 creator A5015915186 @default.
- W2015862005 creator A5046346346 @default.
- W2015862005 creator A5050126178 @default.
- W2015862005 creator A5067856866 @default.
- W2015862005 date "2015-06-01" @default.
- W2015862005 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2015862005 title "Feasibility of patient and peer surveys for Maintenance of Certification among diplomates of the American Board of Anesthesiology" @default.
- W2015862005 cites W1967359323 @default.
- W2015862005 cites W2009989010 @default.
- W2015862005 cites W2033691534 @default.
- W2015862005 cites W2073967874 @default.
- W2015862005 cites W2074279261 @default.
- W2015862005 cites W2096868672 @default.
- W2015862005 cites W2099443809 @default.
- W2015862005 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.002" @default.
- W2015862005 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25792177" @default.
- W2015862005 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2015862005 type Work @default.
- W2015862005 sameAs 2015862005 @default.
- W2015862005 citedByCount "9" @default.
- W2015862005 countsByYear W20158620052015 @default.
- W2015862005 countsByYear W20158620052016 @default.
- W2015862005 countsByYear W20158620052019 @default.
- W2015862005 countsByYear W20158620052020 @default.
- W2015862005 countsByYear W20158620052021 @default.
- W2015862005 countsByYear W20158620052023 @default.
- W2015862005 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2015862005 hasAuthorship W2015862005A5015915186 @default.
- W2015862005 hasAuthorship W2015862005A5046346346 @default.
- W2015862005 hasAuthorship W2015862005A5050126178 @default.
- W2015862005 hasAuthorship W2015862005A5067856866 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C2776392352 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C2779526319 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C17744445 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C199539241 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C2776392352 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C2779526319 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C42219234 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C46304622 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C509550671 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C512399662 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C545542383 @default.
- W2015862005 hasConceptScore W2015862005C71924100 @default.
- W2015862005 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2015862005 hasLocation W20158620051 @default.
- W2015862005 hasLocation W20158620052 @default.
- W2015862005 hasOpenAccess W2015862005 @default.
- W2015862005 hasPrimaryLocation W20158620051 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W1968097809 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W1989235247 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W2036127659 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W2073375187 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W2136831278 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W2783677978 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W2951002589 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W3037940113 @default.
- W2015862005 hasRelatedWork W3213278698 @default.
- W2015862005 hasVolume "27" @default.
- W2015862005 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2015862005 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2015862005 magId "2015862005" @default.
- W2015862005 workType "article" @default.