FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2015926496> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2015926496 endingPage "998" @default.
• W2015926496 startingPage "991" @default.
• W2015926496 abstract "In Brief Study Design. Assessment of the reliability of standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretations and measurements. Objective. To determine the intra- and inter-reader reliability of MRI parameters relevant to patients with intervertebral disc herniation (IDH), including disc morphology classification, degree of thecal sac compromise, grading of nerve root impingement, and measurements of cross-sectional area of the spinal canal, thecal sac, and disc fragment. Summary of Background Data. MRI is increasingly used to assess patients with sciatica and IDH, but the relationship between specific imaging characteristics and patient outcomes remains uncertain. Although other studies have evaluated the reliability of certain MRI characteristics, comprehensive evaluation of the reliability of readings of herniated disc features on MRI is lacking. Methods. Sixty randomly selected MR images from patients with IDH enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial were each rated according to defined criteria by 4 independent readers (3 radiologists and 1 orthopedic surgeon). Quantitative measurements were performed separately by 2 other radiologists. A sample of 20 MRIs was re-evaluated by each reader at least 1 month later. Agreement for rating data were assessed with kappa statistics using linear weights. Reliability of the quantitative measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and summaries of measurement error. Results. Inter-reader reliability was substantial for disc morphology [overall kappa 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78, 0.85)], moderate for thecal sac compression [overall kappa 0.54 (95% CI: 0.37, 0.68)], and moderate for grading nerve root impingement [overall kappa 0.47 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.56)]. Quantitative measures showed high ICCs of 0.87 to 0.96 for spinal canal and thecal sac cross-sectional areas. Measures of disc fragment area had moderate ICCs of 0.65 to 0.83. Mean absolute differences between measurements ranged from approximately 15% to 20%. Conclusion. Classification of disc morphology showed substantial intra- and inter-reader agreement, whereas thecal sac and nerve root compression showed more moderate reader reliability. Quantitative measures of canal and thecal sac area showed good reliability, whereas measurement of disc fragment area showed more modest reliability. Reliability of readings of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics was studied in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation who were eligible surgical candidates enrolled in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial. Classification of disc morphology as “normal/bulge,” “protrusion,” or “extrusion/sequestered” had substantial agreement. Subjective classification of thecal sac compromise and grading of nerve root impingement had moderate reliability. Quantitative measurements of canal and disc fragment size had high intraclass correlation coefficients. Absolute errors at re-measurement were in the range of 15% to 20%." @default.
• W2015926496 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5007488006 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5009421058 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5015676344 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5028099073 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5036501353 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5038929684 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5045313264 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5056732154 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5073689827 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5076999854 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5081385569 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5085278107 @default.
• W2015926496 creator A5088556026 @default.
• W2015926496 date "2008-04-01" @default.
• W2015926496 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2015926496 title "Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Readings for Lumbar Disc Herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT)" @default.
• W2015926496 cites W1966923500 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W1997756029 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2013772498 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2047273978 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2094906704 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2108428812 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2133692882 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2136731999 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2150262085 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2167775808 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2338278742 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2412001115 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2419611142 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W2795191505 @default.
• W2015926496 cites W4293010689 @default.
• W2015926496 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31816c8379" @default.
• W2015926496 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2745940" @default.
• W2015926496 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18427321" @default.
• W2015926496 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2015926496 type Work @default.
• W2015926496 sameAs 2015926496 @default.
• W2015926496 citedByCount "74" @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962012 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962013 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962014 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962015 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962016 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962017 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962018 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962019 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962020 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962021 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962022 @default.
• W2015926496 countsByYear W20159264962023 @default.
• W2015926496 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5007488006 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5009421058 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5015676344 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5028099073 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5036501353 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5038929684 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5045313264 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5056732154 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5073689827 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5076999854 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5081385569 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5085278107 @default.
• W2015926496 hasAuthorship W2015926496A5088556026 @default.
• W2015926496 hasBestOaLocation W20159264962 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C163864269 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C178409289 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2776698514 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2778782708 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2779326565 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2779835254 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2909444396 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2015926496 hasConcept C44575665 @default.

• next