FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016020766> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016020766 endingPage "1109" @default.
• W2016020766 startingPage "1108" @default.
• W2016020766 abstract "The time dedicated to teaching anatomy in the modern medical curriculum has been substantially reduced. Many anatomy programmes have adapted strategies such as the use of prosection and team-based learning (TBL) to cope with time limitations. Regardless, studies have indicated that there are deficiencies in the clinical anatomy knowledge base of medical graduates, particularly with regard to surgically relevant anatomy, which could impact patient health and safety.1 In order to bridge this knowledge gap, third-year clerkship students (M3) at our institution (featuring a representative ‘modern’, 50-hour, prosection- and TBL-based anatomy programme) developed an Advanced Surgical Anatomy Interest Group (ASAIG) elective aimed at integrating common clinical encounters (patient presentations, diagnoses and surgical interventions) and the relevant anatomy. Three sessions were developed (lower limb, upper limb and abdomen). In each 2-hour session, ASAIG M3 leaders delivered presentations, drawing from their personal clerkship experiences, and participants subsequently reviewed anatomy in small groups using cadaveric prosections. Each group included both pre-clerkship (M1, M2) and clerkship (M3) students. Small-group review was facilitated by circulating ASAIG leaders and one anatomy professor. Upon session completion, participants were surveyed for general feedback. Sixty different students (n = 22, n = 21 and n = 17 in the M1, M2 and M3 groups, respectively) attended at least one session, and 18 students (including nine M2 students) attended multiple sessions. Thirty-six survey responses were collected (n = 11, n = 19 and n = 6 for M1, M2 and M3 students, respectively). Widely cited motivations for participation included relevance to career path (24 students indicated interest in a surgical specialty), the wish to be better prepared for clerkship (n = 11), and the wish to gain clinical anatomy knowledge beyond that covered in the curriculum (n = 7). Overall, the M2 group included the largest proportion of students to note each factor as motivating. Responses given on a rating scale of 1–6 (1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree) indicated that participants agreed with the following: the sessions had improved their knowledge of surgical anatomy (mean ± standard deviation [SD] score: 5.4 ± 0.2) and better prepared them for surgical clerkship rotations (mean ± SD score: 5.1 ± 0.3); the mix of pre-clerkship and clerkship students was beneficial to their learning (mean ± SD score: 5.5 ± 0.1), and near-peer teaching created a comfortable learning environment (mean ± SD score: 5.2 ± 0.2). The majority of participants (59%) preferred having clerkship students (rather than faculty staff) lead the sessions. In response to open-ended questions, participants demonstrated particular appreciation for the integration of clinical situations with surgically oriented anatomy (n = 10) and the small-group review that promoted exposure to student perspectives not typically encountered (n = 7), especially clerkship perspectives. Suggested improvements included having more sessions (n = 11), increasing the ratio of clerkship to pre-clerkship students (n = 2), and incorporating hands-on learning of specific surgical techniques (n = 3). In summary, the didactic integration of actual clinical clerkship experiences with relevant surgical anatomy, delivered by clerks to their near-peers, resulted in a time-efficient educational elective that increased student self-perceived preparedness regarding, and helped address curricular deficiencies in, surgical anatomy knowledge. An added benefit was the facilitation of engagement between clerkship and pre-clerkship students who do not normally interact, especially in anatomy learning contexts. These benefits were most appreciated by students about to enter clerkship." @default.
• W2016020766 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016020766 creator A5000521264 @default.
• W2016020766 creator A5021910228 @default.
• W2016020766 creator A5022384784 @default.
• W2016020766 creator A5040921183 @default.
• W2016020766 date "2014-10-12" @default.
• W2016020766 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2016020766 title "Minding the gap: student-led, surgically oriented anatomy electives" @default.
• W2016020766 cites W1964809186 @default.
• W2016020766 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12568" @default.
• W2016020766 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25307644" @default.
• W2016020766 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2016020766 type Work @default.
• W2016020766 sameAs 2016020766 @default.
• W2016020766 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2016020766 countsByYear W20160207662014 @default.
• W2016020766 countsByYear W20160207662016 @default.
• W2016020766 countsByYear W20160207662018 @default.
• W2016020766 countsByYear W20160207662023 @default.
• W2016020766 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016020766 hasAuthorship W2016020766A5000521264 @default.
• W2016020766 hasAuthorship W2016020766A5021910228 @default.
• W2016020766 hasAuthorship W2016020766A5022384784 @default.
• W2016020766 hasAuthorship W2016020766A5040921183 @default.
• W2016020766 hasBestOaLocation W20160207661 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C20038557 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C2777950736 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C105702510 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C136764020 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C15744967 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C159110408 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C19417346 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C20038557 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C27415008 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C2777950736 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C2779182362 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C41008148 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C47177190 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C509550671 @default.
• W2016020766 hasConceptScore W2016020766C71924100 @default.
• W2016020766 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2016020766 hasLocation W20160207661 @default.
• W2016020766 hasLocation W20160207662 @default.
• W2016020766 hasOpenAccess W2016020766 @default.
• W2016020766 hasPrimaryLocation W20160207661 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W2025256408 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W2055759570 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W2160883781 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W2186628887 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W2770999283 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W4225371168 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W4243459470 @default.
• W2016020766 hasRelatedWork W4251696547 @default.
• W2016020766 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W2016020766 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2016020766 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2016020766 magId "2016020766" @default.
• W2016020766 workType "article" @default.