Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016077898> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2016077898 endingPage "e0121131" @default.
- W2016077898 startingPage "e0121131" @default.
- W2016077898 abstract "Objective To compare the effectiveness of different technique modifications in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Design Systematic review and meta-analyses. Data Sources Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Central from January 1st 1997 until April 1st 2014. Study Design All cohort studies and randomized clinical trials comparing fully laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with modifications of the standard technique including hand-assisted, retroperitoneoscopic and single port techniques, were included. Data-Extraction and Analysis The primary outcome measure was the number of complications. Secondary outcome measures included: conversion to open surgery, first warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, graft function, operation time and length of hospital stay. Each technique modification was compared with standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Data was pooled with a random effects meta-analysis using odds ratios, weighted mean differences and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. To assess heterogeneity, the I2 statistic was used. First, randomized clinical trials and cohort studies were analyzed separately, when data was comparable, pooled analysis were performed. Results 31 studies comparing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with other technique modifications were identified, including 5 randomized clinical trials and 26 cohort studies. Since data of randomized clinical trials and cohort studies were comparable, these data were pooled. There were significantly less complications in the retroperitoneoscopic group as compared to transperitoneal group (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.33–0.83, I2 = 0%). Hand-assisted techniques showed shorter first warm ischemia and operation times. Conclusions Hand-assistance reduces the operation and first warm ischemia times and may improve safety for surgeons with less experience in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The retroperitoneoscopic approach was significantly associated with less complications. However, given the, in general, poor to intermediate quality and considerable heterogeneity in the included studies, further high-quality studies are required. Trial Registration The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database before the start of the review process (CRD number 42013006565)." @default.
- W2016077898 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2016077898 creator A5045613242 @default.
- W2016077898 creator A5047716127 @default.
- W2016077898 creator A5053996737 @default.
- W2016077898 creator A5054531598 @default.
- W2016077898 creator A5064692559 @default.
- W2016077898 creator A5072850301 @default.
- W2016077898 creator A5073737638 @default.
- W2016077898 date "2015-03-27" @default.
- W2016077898 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2016077898 title "A Comparison of Technique Modifications in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1512554945 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1739375799 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1943758873 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1975249958 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1985538348 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1989247691 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1993956396 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W1999096527 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2007991797 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2022078857 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2025382727 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2028149307 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2028511945 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2030453860 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2039533139 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2040680118 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2049472296 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2061141640 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2066544273 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2066707540 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2069852201 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2081113120 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2081672512 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2085086516 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2098484309 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2111001636 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2120320334 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2126859430 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2133872173 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2146833793 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2152249240 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2156098321 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2161161650 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2166656354 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2293573856 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2320400255 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2330688925 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W2991792334 @default.
- W2016077898 cites W790793473 @default.
- W2016077898 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121131" @default.
- W2016077898 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4376908" @default.
- W2016077898 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25816148" @default.
- W2016077898 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2016077898 type Work @default.
- W2016077898 sameAs 2016077898 @default.
- W2016077898 citedByCount "32" @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982016 @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982017 @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982018 @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982019 @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982020 @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982021 @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982022 @default.
- W2016077898 countsByYear W20160778982023 @default.
- W2016077898 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2016077898 hasAuthorship W2016077898A5045613242 @default.
- W2016077898 hasAuthorship W2016077898A5047716127 @default.
- W2016077898 hasAuthorship W2016077898A5053996737 @default.
- W2016077898 hasAuthorship W2016077898A5054531598 @default.
- W2016077898 hasAuthorship W2016077898A5064692559 @default.
- W2016077898 hasAuthorship W2016077898A5072850301 @default.
- W2016077898 hasAuthorship W2016077898A5073737638 @default.
- W2016077898 hasBestOaLocation W20160778981 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C2780227381 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C126322002 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C141071460 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C156957248 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C168563851 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C201903717 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C2780047204 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C2780091579 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C2780227381 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C44249647 @default.
- W2016077898 hasConceptScore W2016077898C535046627 @default.