FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016082305> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016082305 endingPage "212" @default.
• W2016082305 startingPage "199" @default.
• W2016082305 abstract "Afterword: What We Can Learn from Military Children and Families Ann S. Masten (bio) The wellbeing of military children and families in the United States has far-reaching significance for the nation as a whole, in addition to its importance for military capabilities and individual service members and their families. The articles in this issue underscore this message as they update what we know and what we need to know about the challenges and opportunities of military life for children and their families. Although military life has unique hazards and benefits, there are also many parallels in the lives of military and civilian families. Thus, the struggles and achievements of military families and the systems that support them hold valuable lessons for all of us. Based on this issue of the Future of Children, this commentary highlights lessons we can learn from military children and families that have the potential to help many families outside the military. It also suggests ways to build on those lessons through additional research and dissemination. The articles in this issue are grounded in two sets of ideas: contemporary developmental systems theory and a resilience framework.1 Central to developmental systems theory is the idea that a person’s adaptation and development over the life course is shaped by interactions among many systems, from the level of genes or neurons to the level of family, peers, school, community, and the larger society. Similarly, a family is shaped over time by many interactions among its members and other systems outside the family. This issue makes clear that the U.S. military has recognized the interdependence among systems as its leaders strive to shape and retain a highly effective all-volunteer force. Across the service branches, the military has acted to improve the systems that support service members and their families. These efforts reflect the military’s implicit or explicit belief that children’s wellbeing influences the successful functioning of their service member parents, and that the military’s collective effectiveness depends, now and in the future, on the success of the children and families who serve along with their parents, spouses, and partners. A resilience framework has compelling advantages for understanding and promoting success in military families and organizations. [End Page 199] Such a framework accords well with the goals of military systems, service members, and their families, all of whom, in varying ways, share an interest in successful adaptation, resilience, and recovery in the context of challenging and traumatic experiences. When people face potentially life-ending or life-altering hazards, a resilience framework emphasizes positive objectives; building the capacity to respond effectively; the potential for recovery; and the power of relationships, families, communities, and other external resources to boost resilience, in addition to individual strengths and skills.2 As a result, resilience-based approaches convey respect for human capabilities and optimism about the future, while they simultaneously recognize the suffering and devastation that can arise in situations of extreme adversity, including war. Resilience refers generally to the successful adaptation of a system in response to significant challenges. This concept can be applied to any living organism, as well as a family, a community, a workplace, the military as a whole, a computer system, a country, or a global ecosystem. “Successful adaptation,” of course, will be defined in different ways, depending on the values, goals, culture, and historical or scientific context of the people making judgments about success. For individual children, both developmental and cultural context play a role in defining good adaptation. Developmental scientists often define resilience with respect to expected achievements for children of different ages or stages of development, sometimes called developmental tasks.3 Some of these expectations are universal, such as learning to walk or talk. Others are more specific to a culture or situation, such as learning to hunt or to read sacred scriptures in the original language. Families are often judged by how well they promote the health, development, and goals of their members within their culture or society.4 Resilience frameworks emerged from five decades of research on resilience in human development, supplemented in recent years by efforts to work across disciplinary boundaries.5 Resilience frameworks typically encompass, delineate..." @default.
• W2016082305 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016082305 creator A5062990386 @default.
• W2016082305 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2016082305 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2016082305 title "Afterword: What We Can Learn from Military Children and Families" @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1483377179 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1493428590 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1505899619 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1535347451 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1539899107 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1542722502 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1554567961 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1563696995 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1934851797 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1972374932 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1974449941 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W1989177187 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2002115748 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2016091922 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2030614979 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2041538096 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2043326867 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2045964008 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2054424090 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2059346920 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2063677161 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2072859817 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2073537354 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2074746092 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2092421817 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2106757062 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2120815530 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2135725819 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2142093171 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2142147616 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2148186812 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2148798709 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2152709918 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2153190846 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2155083749 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2157117514 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2165931121 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2198970841 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2500682417 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W2526903834 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W432394229 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W60801008 @default.
• W2016082305 cites W625252937 @default.
• W2016082305 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2013.0012" @default.
• W2016082305 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25518699" @default.
• W2016082305 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2016082305 type Work @default.
• W2016082305 sameAs 2016082305 @default.
• W2016082305 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2016082305 countsByYear W20160823052014 @default.
• W2016082305 countsByYear W20160823052015 @default.
• W2016082305 countsByYear W20160823052016 @default.
• W2016082305 countsByYear W20160823052017 @default.
• W2016082305 countsByYear W20160823052018 @default.
• W2016082305 countsByYear W20160823052020 @default.
• W2016082305 countsByYear W20160823052022 @default.
• W2016082305 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016082305 hasAuthorship W2016082305A5062990386 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C137176749 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C139807058 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C2775922551 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C2776948989 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C2779072820 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C127413603 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C137176749 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C139807058 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C144024400 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C156325361 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C15744967 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C169760540 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C17744445 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C190248442 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C199539241 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C2775922551 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C2776948989 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C2779072820 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C36289849 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C39549134 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C77805123 @default.
• W2016082305 hasConceptScore W2016082305C78519656 @default.

• next