FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016088369> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016088369 endingPage "2826" @default.
• W2016088369 startingPage "2816" @default.
• W2016088369 abstract "Treatment verification is a prerequisite for the verification of complex treatments, checking both the treatment planning process and the actual beam delivery. Pretreatment verification can detect errors introduced by the treatment planning system (TPS) or differences between planned and delivered dose distributions. In a previous paper we described the reconstruction of three‐dimensional (3‐D) dose distributions in homogeneous phantoms using an in‐house developed model based on the beams delivered by the linear accelerator measured with an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID), and a dose calculation engine using the Monte Carlo code XVMC . The aim of the present study is to extend the method to situations in which tissue inhomogeneities are present and to make a comparison with the dose distributions calculated by the TPS. Dose distributions in inhomogeneous phantoms, calculated using the fast‐Fourier transform convolution (FFTC) and multigrid superposition (MGS) algorithms present in the TPS, were verified using the EPID‐based dose reconstruction method and compared to film and ionization chamber measurements. Differences between dose distributions were evaluated using the ‐evaluation method and expressed as a mean and the percentage of points with . For rectangular inhomogeneous phantoms containing a low‐density region, the differences between film and reconstructed dose distributions were smaller than 3%. In low‐density regions there was an overestimation of the planned dose using the FFTC and MGS algorithms of the TPS up to 20% and 8%, respectively, for a photon beam and a field. For lower energies and larger fields ( , ), these differences reduced to 6% and 3%, respectively. Dose reconstruction performed in an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom for a 3‐D conformal and an IMRT plan, showed good agreement between film data and reconstructed dose values . The algorithms of the TPS underestimated the dose in the low‐dose regions outside the treatment field, due to an implementation error of the jaws and multileaf collimator of the linac in the TPS. The FFTC algorithm of the TPS showed differences up to 6% or at the interface between lung and breast. Two intensity‐modulated radiation therapy head and neck plans, reconstructed in a commercial phantom having a bone‐equivalent insert and an air cavity, showed good agreement between film measurement, reconstructed and planned dose distributions using the FFTC and MGS algorithm, except in the bone‐equivalent regions where both TPS algorithms underestimated the dose with 4%. Absolute dose verification was performed at the isocenter where both planned and reconstructed dose were within 2% of the measured dose. Reproducibility for the EPID measurements was assessed and found to be of negligible influence on the reconstructed dose distribution. Our 3‐D dose verification approach is based on the actual dose measured with an EPID in combination with a Monte Carlo dose engine, and therefore independent of a TPS. Because dose values are reconstructed in 3‐D, isodose surfaces and dose‐volume histograms can be used to detect dose differences in target volume and normal tissues. Using our method, the combined planning and treatment delivery process is verified, offering an easy to use tool for the verification of complex treatments." @default.
• W2016088369 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016088369 creator A5013513157 @default.
• W2016088369 creator A5051405489 @default.
• W2016088369 creator A5056195543 @default.
• W2016088369 creator A5058987737 @default.
• W2016088369 creator A5081891037 @default.
• W2016088369 date "2007-06-14" @default.
• W2016088369 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2016088369 title "Treatment verification in the presence of inhomogeneities using EPID-based three-dimensional dose reconstruction" @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1967121735 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1969125839 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1971331363 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1973124272 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1973430833 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1978419083 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1991101907 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W1994858835 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2008245942 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2010887698 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2036665707 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2047762563 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2057208460 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2061071868 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2081213980 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2106557818 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2109504804 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2127539765 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2132034794 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2132925891 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W2156558731 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W3028040726 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W4248338421 @default.
• W2016088369 cites W4254450101 @default.
• W2016088369 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2742778" @default.
• W2016088369 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17821989" @default.
• W2016088369 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2016088369 type Work @default.
• W2016088369 sameAs 2016088369 @default.
• W2016088369 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692012 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692013 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692014 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692015 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692016 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692017 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692018 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692019 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692020 @default.
• W2016088369 countsByYear W20160883692022 @default.
• W2016088369 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016088369 hasAuthorship W2016088369A5013513157 @default.
• W2016088369 hasAuthorship W2016088369A5051405489 @default.
• W2016088369 hasAuthorship W2016088369A5056195543 @default.
• W2016088369 hasAuthorship W2016088369A5058987737 @default.
• W2016088369 hasAuthorship W2016088369A5081891037 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C27753989 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C31601959 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C45347329 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C50644808 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C63007395 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C104293457 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C105795698 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C120665830 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C121332964 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C126322002 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C154945302 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C192562407 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C19499675 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C201645570 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C27753989 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C2989005 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C31601959 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C33923547 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C41008148 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C45347329 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C50644808 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C509974204 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C62520636 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C63007395 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C71924100 @default.
• W2016088369 hasConceptScore W2016088369C75088862 @default.

• next