FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016095264> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016095264 endingPage "648" @default.
• W2016095264 startingPage "642" @default.
• W2016095264 abstract "Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Objectives To investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of photographic measurements of hallux valgus angle compared to radiographs as the criterion standard. Background Clinical assessment of hallux valgus involves measuring alignment between the first toe and metatarsal on weight-bearing radiographs or visually grading the severity of deformity with categorical scales. Digital photographs offer a noninvasive method of measuring deformity on an exact scale; however, the validity of this technique has not previously been established. Methods Thirty-eight subjects (30 female, 8 male) were examined (76 feet, 54 with hallux valgus). Computer software was used to measure hallux valgus angle from digital records of bilateral weight-bearing dorsoplantar foot radiographs and photographs. One examiner measured 76 feet on 2 occasions 2 weeks apart, and a second examiner measured 40 feet on a single occasion. Reliability was investigated by intraclass correlation coefficients and validity by 95% limits of agreement. The Pearson correlation coefficient was also calculated. Results Intrarater and interrater reliability were very high (intraclass correlation coefficients greater than 0.96) and 95% limits of agreement between photographic and radiographic measurements were acceptable. Measurements from photographs and radiographs were also highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.96). Conclusion Digital photographic measurements of hallux valgus angle are reliable and have acceptable validity compared to weight-bearing radiographs. This method provides a convenient and precise tool in assessment of hallux valgus, while avoiding the cost and radiation exposure associated with radiographs. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012;42(7):642–648, Epub 25 January 2012. doi:10.2519/jospt.2012.3841" @default.
• W2016095264 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016095264 creator A5020549102 @default.
• W2016095264 creator A5037731392 @default.
• W2016095264 creator A5045163058 @default.
• W2016095264 creator A5057205268 @default.
• W2016095264 date "2012-07-01" @default.
• W2016095264 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2016095264 title "Validity and Reliability of Hallux Valgus Angle Measured on Digital Photographs" @default.
• W2016095264 cites W1853050510 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W1947806687 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W1955806413 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W1997915787 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2015745252 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2026965271 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2032995217 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2033057525 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2043583971 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2047000480 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2058866691 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2071025501 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2085214733 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2092647804 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2102846542 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2108533853 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2111544199 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2121647405 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2126715252 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2129044063 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2134850499 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2150111805 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2161438703 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W2442731159 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W4248803832 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W4249810852 @default.
• W2016095264 cites W61577260 @default.
• W2016095264 doi "https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2012.3841" @default.
• W2016095264 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22282040" @default.
• W2016095264 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2016095264 type Work @default.
• W2016095264 sameAs 2016095264 @default.
• W2016095264 citedByCount "37" @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642013 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642014 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642015 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642016 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642017 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642018 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642019 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642020 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642021 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642022 @default.
• W2016095264 countsByYear W20160952642023 @default.
• W2016095264 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016095264 hasAuthorship W2016095264A5020549102 @default.
• W2016095264 hasAuthorship W2016095264A5037731392 @default.
• W2016095264 hasAuthorship W2016095264A5045163058 @default.
• W2016095264 hasAuthorship W2016095264A5057205268 @default.
• W2016095264 hasBestOaLocation W20160952642 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C2778879847 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C2779982284 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C40993552 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C70364389 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C104709138 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C121332964 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C126838900 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C141071460 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C163258240 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C171606756 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C2778879847 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C2779982284 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C2781017183 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C29694066 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C36454342 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C40993552 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C43214815 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C62520636 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C70364389 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C70410870 @default.
• W2016095264 hasConceptScore W2016095264C71924100 @default.
• W2016095264 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2016095264 hasLocation W20160952641 @default.
• W2016095264 hasLocation W20160952642 @default.

• next