FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016159062> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016159062 endingPage "400" @default.
• W2016159062 startingPage "390" @default.
• W2016159062 abstract "Background. Previous randomized studies of laparoscopic appendectomy produced conflicting recommendations, and the adequacy of sample sizes is generally unknown. We compared clinical and economic outcomes after laparoscopic and open appendectomy in a sample of predetermined statistical power. Methods. A pre-study power analysis suggested that 200 randomized patients would yield 80% power to show a mean decrease of 1.3 days' hospitalization. One hundred ninety-eight patients with a preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis were randomized prospectively to laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Economic analysis included billed charges, total costs, direct costs, and indirect costs associated with treatment. Results. Laparoscopic appendectomy took longer to perform than open appendectomy (median, 107 vs 91 minutes; P < .01) and was associated with fewer days to return to a general diet (mean, 1.6 versus 2.3 days; P < .01), a shorter duration of parenteral analgesia (mean, 1.6 versus 2.2 days; P < .01), fewer morphine-equivalent milligrams of parenteral narcotic (median, 14 mg versus 34 mg; P = .001), a shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean, 2.6 versus 3.4 days; P <.01), and earlier return to full activity (median, 14 versus 21 days; P < .02). However, operative morbidity and time to return to work were comparable. Billed charges and direct costs were not significantly different in the 2 groups ($7711 versus $7146 and $5357 versus $4945, respectively), but total costs (including indirect costs) of laparoscopic appendectomy were, on average, nearly $2400 less, given the shorter length of stay and abbreviated recuperative period ($11,577 versus $13,965). Subgroup analyses suggested the benefit of a laparoscopic approach for uncomplicated appendicitis and for patients with active lifestyles. Conclusions. While laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with statistically significant but clinically questionable advantages over open appendectomy, a laparoscopic approach is relatively less expensive. The estimated difference in total costs of treatment (direct and indirect costs) was at least $2000 in more than 60% of the bootstrapped iterations. The economic significance and implications favoring a laparoscopic approach cannot be ignored. (Surgery 2001;129:390-400.)" @default.
• W2016159062 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5000009499 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5001197551 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5007424808 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5033210794 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5044847415 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5049679427 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5071291870 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5080012644 @default.
• W2016159062 creator A5080280899 @default.
• W2016159062 date "2001-04-01" @default.
• W2016159062 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2016159062 title "A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses" @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1498037430 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1554688831 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1562016301 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W179339818 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1846128085 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1965920149 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1984742333 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1988983784 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1996386653 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1999449787 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1999818539 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2002388263 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2009271910 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2020347864 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2031566223 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2041807485 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2047909113 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2063528220 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2066612870 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2076745981 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2089101007 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2091277459 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2091823111 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2100957861 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2101535430 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2105240963 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2107031757 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2124939681 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2147835932 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2411484825 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2411687968 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W2429236659 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W66044108 @default.
• W2016159062 cites W1977689199 @default.
• W2016159062 doi "https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2001.114216" @default.
• W2016159062 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11283528" @default.
• W2016159062 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2016159062 type Work @default.
• W2016159062 sameAs 2016159062 @default.
• W2016159062 citedByCount "110" @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622012 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622013 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622014 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622015 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622016 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622017 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622018 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622019 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622020 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622021 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622022 @default.
• W2016159062 countsByYear W20161590622023 @default.
• W2016159062 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5000009499 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5001197551 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5007424808 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5033210794 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5044847415 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5049679427 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5071291870 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5080012644 @default.
• W2016159062 hasAuthorship W2016159062A5080280899 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C2775849661 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C2780016130 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C3018581240 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C126322002 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C141071460 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C168563851 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C187960798 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C2775849661 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C2780016130 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C2780047204 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C3018581240 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C42219234 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C44249647 @default.
• W2016159062 hasConceptScore W2016159062C71924100 @default.

• next