FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016202226> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016202226 endingPage "367" @default.
• W2016202226 startingPage "360" @default.
• W2016202226 abstract "As the population ages rapidly, we need to establish a cost-effective system to assess and treat urination problems of the elderly. Recently, criteria have been developed for urologists to assess benign prostatic hyperplasia using the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), QoL index, urination function (maximal flow rates and residual urine volume) and prostate volume. It is suggested that patients with moderate to severe urination problems as measured by these criteria need to be treated but those with mild problems have no need for treatment. We examined whether these criteria can be applied to the general urination problems of elderly men and women, with 112 men and 21 women aged 50 and over as subjects. Furthermore, we set Level I criteria for the elderly themselves, their families or nurses taking care of them, using I-PSS and QoL index, and Level II criteria for general practitioners, using I-PSS, QoL index and residual urine volume, in addition to Level III criteria for urologists (omitting prostate volume in women). Correspondence rates among severities of urination problems at Level I, II and III, and sensitivities and specificities of Level I and II criteria were investigated. One hundred twenty-one patients of 124 with moderate to severe urination problems at Level III needed to be treated and eight of nine with mild urination problems did not. As a whole, our findings suggested that 129 of 133 patients (97.0%) were correctly assessed at Level III. We found that Level III criteria were valid for general urination problems of the elderly, not just benign prostatic hyperplasia. While 102 and 111 patients were judged as having moderate or severe urination problems, respectively, at Level I and Level II, and all of these were diagnosed as having moderate or severe problems at Level III, 22 (71.0%) of 31 and 13 (59.1%) of 22 patients judged as having mild urination problems at Level I and Level II were diagnosed as having moderate problems at Level III. Although specificities of Level I and Level II criteria were 100%, sensitivities improved from 82.3% (102/124) to 89.5% (111/124), adding residual urine measurement to the I-PSS and QoL scores. Polyuria of more than 2,000 ml per day was noted in 33 patients (24.8%). At Level I, residual urine of 50 ml or more was noted in 9 (29.0%) patients with mild urination problems, in 22 (24.2%) with moderate problems and in 4 (36.4%) with severe problems. Assessment criteria for general practitioners should include a frequency-volume chart and measurement of residual urine. When the elderly are judged as having moderate or severe urination problems according to either Level I or II criteria, they need treatment. However, more than half of the elderly, judged as having mild problems according to those criteria, need treatment from the standpoint of urologists." @default.
• W2016202226 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5009211719 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5014100477 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5014900735 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5017893764 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5020451251 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5024744698 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5041186246 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5057284261 @default.
• W2016202226 creator A5080652822 @default.
• W2016202226 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W2016202226 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2016202226 title "Initial assessment criteria for urination problems of the elderly" @default.
• W2016202226 cites W1964008135 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W1964254548 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W1982976727 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W1983489046 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2010268281 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2031760930 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2059781217 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2074327647 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2084318739 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2088334741 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2401344438 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2409200246 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2412086041 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2465636875 @default.
• W2016202226 cites W2993539218 @default.
• W2016202226 doi "https://doi.org/10.3143/geriatrics.40.360" @default.
• W2016202226 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12934567" @default.
• W2016202226 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2016202226 type Work @default.
• W2016202226 sameAs 2016202226 @default.
• W2016202226 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2016202226 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5009211719 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5014100477 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5014900735 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5017893764 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5020451251 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5024744698 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5041186246 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5057284261 @default.
• W2016202226 hasAuthorship W2016202226A5080652822 @default.
• W2016202226 hasBestOaLocation W20162022261 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C175768497 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C2776547966 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C2779478474 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C2909562073 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C2909593344 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C121608353 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C126322002 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C126894567 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C175768497 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C2776235491 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C2776547966 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C2779478474 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C2909562073 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C2909593344 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C71924100 @default.
• W2016202226 hasConceptScore W2016202226C77411442 @default.
• W2016202226 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2016202226 hasLocation W20162022261 @default.
• W2016202226 hasLocation W20162022262 @default.
• W2016202226 hasOpenAccess W2016202226 @default.
• W2016202226 hasPrimaryLocation W20162022261 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W1987818286 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W1999527019 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W2144386266 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W2369025381 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W2380445115 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W2415598750 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W3030206568 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W3031459995 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W4315436050 @default.
• W2016202226 hasRelatedWork W98395429 @default.
• W2016202226 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2016202226 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2016202226 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2016202226 magId "2016202226" @default.
• W2016202226 workType "article" @default.