FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016206843> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016206843 endingPage "729" @default.
• W2016206843 startingPage "721" @default.
• W2016206843 abstract "Objective This study was undertaken to examine the cost-effectiveness and procedural-related losses associated with 5 prenatal screening strategies for fetal aneuploidy in women under 35 years old. Study design Five prenatal screening strategies were compared in a decision analysis model: triple screen: maternal age and midtrimester serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and unconjugated estriol; quad screen: triple screen plus serum dimeric inhibin A; first-trimester screen: maternal age, serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-hCG and fetal nuchal translucency at 10 to 14 weeks' gestation; integrated screen: first-trimester screen plus quad screen, but first-trimester results are withheld until the quad screen is completed when a composite result is provided; sequential screen: first-trimester screen plus quad screen, but the first-trimester screen results are provided immediately and prenatal diagnosis offered if positive; later prenatal diagnosis is available if the quad screen is positive. Model estimates were literature derived, and cost estimates also included local sources. The 5 strategies were compared for cost, the numbers of Down syndrome fetuses detected and live births averted, and the number of procedure-related euploid losses. Sensitivity analyses were performed for parameters with imprecise point estimates. Results In the baseline analysis, sequential screening was the least expensive strategy ($455 million). It detected the most Down syndrome fetuses (n = 1213), averted the most Down syndrome live births (n = 678), but led to the highest number of procedure-related euploid losses (n = 859). The integrated screen had the fewest euploid losses (n = 62) and averted the second most Down syndrome live births (n = 520). If fewer than 70% of women diagnosed with fetal Down syndrome elect to abort, the quad screen became the least expensive strategy. Conclusion Although sequential screening was the most cost-effective prenatal screening strategy for fetal trisomy 21, it had the highest procedure-related euploid loss rate. The patient's perspective on detection versus fetal safety may help define the optimal screening strategy." @default.
• W2016206843 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016206843 creator A5019896304 @default.
• W2016206843 creator A5043895906 @default.
• W2016206843 creator A5063348453 @default.
• W2016206843 creator A5079498612 @default.
• W2016206843 date "2004-03-01" @default.
• W2016206843 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2016206843 title "An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years" @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1964484819 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1967882786 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1969998398 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1976015389 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1979816072 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1990371694 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1994933000 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W1997767790 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2003707109 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2011245539 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2018023570 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2018167420 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2022960826 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2023665382 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2030645242 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2030693174 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2040213054 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2041956734 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2043883300 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2044504499 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2050065579 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2051436221 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2059137879 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2064142074 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2064491515 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2066839254 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2094584499 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2098252458 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2102324413 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2110354999 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2118934715 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2119081077 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2124313200 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2126732157 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2136826099 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2139381701 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2142091369 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2145615171 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2162325477 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2168802143 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2185113854 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2332017164 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W2338162766 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W3147005637 @default.
• W2016206843 cites W4254694901 @default.
• W2016206843 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.028" @default.
• W2016206843 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15042005" @default.
• W2016206843 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2016206843 type Work @default.
• W2016206843 sameAs 2016206843 @default.
• W2016206843 citedByCount "62" @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432012 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432013 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432014 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432015 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432016 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432017 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432019 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432020 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432021 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432022 @default.
• W2016206843 countsByYear W20162068432023 @default.
• W2016206843 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016206843 hasAuthorship W2016206843A5019896304 @default.
• W2016206843 hasAuthorship W2016206843A5043895906 @default.
• W2016206843 hasAuthorship W2016206843A5063348453 @default.
• W2016206843 hasAuthorship W2016206843A5079498612 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2776229224 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2777335581 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2778258057 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2778279030 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2779672484 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2779954681 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C2992422692 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C30481170 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C46973012 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C71315377 @default.
• W2016206843 hasConcept C71924100 @default.

• next