Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016359912> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W2016359912 endingPage "441" @default.
- W2016359912 startingPage "435" @default.
- W2016359912 abstract "Because it is still a puzzling debate whether ligation of a unilateral varicose spermatic vein is worth performing by laparoscopy, even with the two-port technique, we conducted a study in which 280 patients with palpable left varicoceles were treated with spermatic vein ligation either by open surgery (120 patients) or by laparoscopy (160 patients). The inclusion criteria were the same for each group, and the two groups were homogeneous in preoperative clinical features and patient characteristics. The clinical outcomes were compared 6 months after surgery, and the costs of each treatment were analyzed. The procedures showed the same effectiveness and intraoperative safety. Open surgery scored a shorter operating time, whereas hospitalization was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the open surgery than in the laparoscopic group (7.5% and 0.6%, respectively). Of the patients treated, 197 were eligible for seminal analysis: 82 and 115 in the open surgery and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Significant improvement in seminal analysis was recorded in both groups, whereas no difference was found between the groups. Laparoscopy costs about 60% more than open surgery. It can thus be concluded that laparoscopy is not a worthy method to treat unilateral varicocele." @default.
- W2016359912 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2016359912 creator A5001082500 @default.
- W2016359912 creator A5051887033 @default.
- W2016359912 creator A5053735621 @default.
- W2016359912 creator A5067406353 @default.
- W2016359912 date "1996-10-01" @default.
- W2016359912 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
- W2016359912 title "Is Laparoscopy a Worthy Method to Treat Varicocele? Comparison Between 160 Cases of Two-Port Laparoscopic and 120 Cases of Open Inguinal Spermatic Vein Ligation" @default.
- W2016359912 cites W1495659194 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W1548540908 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W1995432948 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W2070079981 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W2128074370 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W2419139808 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W4231769663 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W4249475184 @default.
- W2016359912 cites W4321123269 @default.
- W2016359912 doi "https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1996.10.435" @default.
- W2016359912 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8905490" @default.
- W2016359912 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
- W2016359912 type Work @default.
- W2016359912 sameAs 2016359912 @default.
- W2016359912 citedByCount "25" @default.
- W2016359912 countsByYear W20163599122014 @default.
- W2016359912 countsByYear W20163599122015 @default.
- W2016359912 countsByYear W20163599122019 @default.
- W2016359912 countsByYear W20163599122023 @default.
- W2016359912 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2016359912 hasAuthorship W2016359912A5001082500 @default.
- W2016359912 hasAuthorship W2016359912A5051887033 @default.
- W2016359912 hasAuthorship W2016359912A5053735621 @default.
- W2016359912 hasAuthorship W2016359912A5067406353 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C179437574 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C2778054964 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C2910649274 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C3018900477 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C32802771 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C119599485 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C127413603 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C141071460 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C179437574 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C2776111594 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C2777688143 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C2778054964 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C2779234561 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C2780047204 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C2910649274 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C3018900477 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C32802771 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C54355233 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C71924100 @default.
- W2016359912 hasConceptScore W2016359912C86803240 @default.
- W2016359912 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2016359912 hasLocation W20163599121 @default.
- W2016359912 hasLocation W20163599122 @default.
- W2016359912 hasOpenAccess W2016359912 @default.
- W2016359912 hasPrimaryLocation W20163599121 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2003200395 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2043166022 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2045795714 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2209266232 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2357636918 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2360772731 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2384069271 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W2409062114 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W3030911345 @default.
- W2016359912 hasRelatedWork W3031290034 @default.
- W2016359912 hasVolume "10" @default.
- W2016359912 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2016359912 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2016359912 magId "2016359912" @default.
- W2016359912 workType "article" @default.