FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016427306> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016427306 endingPage "872" @default.
• W2016427306 startingPage "866" @default.
• W2016427306 abstract "Purpose To prospectively compare plans generated with iCycle, an in-house-developed algorithm for fully automated multicriterial intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beam profile and beam orientation optimization, with plans manually generated by dosimetrists using the clinical treatment planning system. Methods and Materials For 20 randomly selected head-and-neck cancer patients with various tumor locations (of whom 13 received sequential boost treatments), we offered the treating physician the choice between an automatically generated iCycle plan and a manually optimized plan using standard clinical procedures. Although iCycle used a fixed “wish list” with hard constraints and prioritized objectives, the dosimetrists manually selected the beam configuration and fine tuned the constraints and objectives for each IMRT plan. Dosimetrists were not informed in advance whether a competing iCycle plan was made. The 2 plans were simultaneously presented to the physician, who then selected the plan to be used for treatment. For the patient group, differences in planning target volume coverage and sparing of critical tissues were quantified. Results In 32 of 33 plan comparisons, the physician selected the iCycle plan for treatment. This highly consistent preference for the automatically generated plans was mainly caused by the improved sparing for the large majority of critical structures. With iCycle, the normal tissue complication probabilities for the parotid and submandibular glands were reduced by 2.4% ± 4.9% (maximum, 18.5%, P=.001) and 6.5% ± 8.3% (maximum, 27%, P=.005), respectively. The reduction in the mean oral cavity dose was 2.8 ± 2.8 Gy (maximum, 8.1 Gy, P=.005). For the swallowing muscles, the esophagus and larynx, the mean dose reduction was 3.3 ± 1.1 Gy (maximum, 9.2 Gy, P<.001). For 15 of the 20 patients, target coverage was also improved. Conclusions In 97% of cases, automatically generated plans were selected for treatment because of the superior quality. Apart from the improved plan quality, automatic plan generation is economically attractive because of the reduced workload. To prospectively compare plans generated with iCycle, an in-house-developed algorithm for fully automated multicriterial intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beam profile and beam orientation optimization, with plans manually generated by dosimetrists using the clinical treatment planning system. For 20 randomly selected head-and-neck cancer patients with various tumor locations (of whom 13 received sequential boost treatments), we offered the treating physician the choice between an automatically generated iCycle plan and a manually optimized plan using standard clinical procedures. Although iCycle used a fixed “wish list” with hard constraints and prioritized objectives, the dosimetrists manually selected the beam configuration and fine tuned the constraints and objectives for each IMRT plan. Dosimetrists were not informed in advance whether a competing iCycle plan was made. The 2 plans were simultaneously presented to the physician, who then selected the plan to be used for treatment. For the patient group, differences in planning target volume coverage and sparing of critical tissues were quantified. In 32 of 33 plan comparisons, the physician selected the iCycle plan for treatment. This highly consistent preference for the automatically generated plans was mainly caused by the improved sparing for the large majority of critical structures. With iCycle, the normal tissue complication probabilities for the parotid and submandibular glands were reduced by 2.4% ± 4.9% (maximum, 18.5%, P=.001) and 6.5% ± 8.3% (maximum, 27%, P=.005), respectively. The reduction in the mean oral cavity dose was 2.8 ± 2.8 Gy (maximum, 8.1 Gy, P=.005). For the swallowing muscles, the esophagus and larynx, the mean dose reduction was 3.3 ± 1.1 Gy (maximum, 9.2 Gy, P<.001). For 15 of the 20 patients, target coverage was also improved. In 97% of cases, automatically generated plans were selected for treatment because of the superior quality. Apart from the improved plan quality, automatic plan generation is economically attractive because of the reduced workload." @default.
• W2016427306 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016427306 creator A5004993183 @default.
• W2016427306 creator A5034785755 @default.
• W2016427306 creator A5055325581 @default.
• W2016427306 creator A5060080383 @default.
• W2016427306 creator A5080633542 @default.
• W2016427306 creator A5090717912 @default.
• W2016427306 date "2013-03-01" @default.
• W2016427306 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2016427306 title "Toward Fully Automated Multicriterial Plan Generation: A Prospective Clinical Study" @default.
• W2016427306 cites W1999916457 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2028202986 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2057691621 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2061036312 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2068943445 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2080107625 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2081365004 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2089547408 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2116622921 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2121005435 @default.
• W2016427306 cites W2123083071 @default.
• W2016427306 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.015" @default.
• W2016427306 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22658513" @default.
• W2016427306 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2016427306 type Work @default.
• W2016427306 sameAs 2016427306 @default.
• W2016427306 citedByCount "127" @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062012 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062013 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062014 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062015 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062016 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062017 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062018 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062019 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062020 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062021 @default.
• W2016427306 countsByYear W20164273062022 @default.
• W2016427306 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016427306 hasAuthorship W2016427306A5004993183 @default.
• W2016427306 hasAuthorship W2016427306A5034785755 @default.
• W2016427306 hasAuthorship W2016427306A5055325581 @default.
• W2016427306 hasAuthorship W2016427306A5060080383 @default.
• W2016427306 hasAuthorship W2016427306A5080633542 @default.
• W2016427306 hasAuthorship W2016427306A5090717912 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C16345878 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C2776505523 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C2776530083 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C3018411727 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C126838900 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C141071460 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C16345878 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C166957645 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C19527891 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C201645570 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C2524010 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C2776505523 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C2776530083 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C2989005 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C3018411727 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C33923547 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C509974204 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C71924100 @default.
• W2016427306 hasConceptScore W2016427306C95457728 @default.
• W2016427306 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2016427306 hasLocation W20164273061 @default.
• W2016427306 hasLocation W20164273062 @default.
• W2016427306 hasOpenAccess W2016427306 @default.
• W2016427306 hasPrimaryLocation W20164273061 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W1993267564 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2007176132 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2089297819 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2092390197 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2318228201 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2410190481 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2529376761 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2539438258 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2601224035 @default.
• W2016427306 hasRelatedWork W2782093815 @default.
• W2016427306 hasVolume "85" @default.
• W2016427306 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2016427306 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2016427306 magId "2016427306" @default.
• W2016427306 workType "article" @default.