Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016454767> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 80 of
80
with 100 items per page.
- W2016454767 endingPage "43" @default.
- W2016454767 startingPage "40" @default.
- W2016454767 abstract "INTRODUCTION Traditionally, the cervicomastoidfacial (CMF) incision is used to excise benign tumours of the parotid gland. The rhytidectomy or modified facelift (MF) incision allows an alternative approach which leaves no visible neck scar. The objective of this study was to establish the frequency of each surgical approach used and identify any difference in complication and patient satisfaction between the two incisions for benign conditions of the parotid gland. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of 101 case notes for patients who underwent parotidectomy by both ENT and maxillofacial departments between January 2006 and February 2008 was undertaken. All histologically confirmed cases of malignancy were excluded. For each incision, immediate postoperative complications were obtained from the notes. A postal patient outcome evaluation questionnaire sought information regarding persistent and late complications as well as a visual analogue scar satisfaction score for both incisions. RESULTS Overall, 79 parotidectomies were included (59 CMF incisions, 20 MF incisions). Of CMF incisions, 34% suffered facial weakness immediately postoperatively versus 20% of MF incisions. Of CMF incisions, 4% suffered postoperative haematomas versus none following MF incisions. In the study cohort, 47 (60%) responded to the postal feedback questionnaire (33 CMF versus 14 MF respondents). Information regarding immediate and late postoperative ipsilateral facial paraesthe-sia and gustatory sweating was obtained. Mean visual analogue scar satisfaction scores were 9.4 for CMF incisions and 8.9 for MF incisions. CONCLUSIONS Immediate and late complications for CMF and MF approaches for benign disease parotidectomy were comparable, but scar satisfaction following MF incision was not greater than CMF incisions." @default.
- W2016454767 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2016454767 creator A5001233964 @default.
- W2016454767 creator A5018551535 @default.
- W2016454767 creator A5036761859 @default.
- W2016454767 creator A5066184643 @default.
- W2016454767 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W2016454767 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2016454767 title "Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified facelift incision for parotid surgery: a patient feedback comparison" @default.
- W2016454767 cites W1975234301 @default.
- W2016454767 cites W2000281390 @default.
- W2016454767 cites W2019470957 @default.
- W2016454767 cites W2086120031 @default.
- W2016454767 cites W2107285100 @default.
- W2016454767 doi "https://doi.org/10.1308/003588410x12518836440009" @default.
- W2016454767 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3024615" @default.
- W2016454767 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20056059" @default.
- W2016454767 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W2016454767 type Work @default.
- W2016454767 sameAs 2016454767 @default.
- W2016454767 citedByCount "26" @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672013 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672015 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672016 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672017 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672019 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672020 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672021 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672022 @default.
- W2016454767 countsByYear W20164547672023 @default.
- W2016454767 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2016454767 hasAuthorship W2016454767A5001233964 @default.
- W2016454767 hasAuthorship W2016454767A5018551535 @default.
- W2016454767 hasAuthorship W2016454767A5036761859 @default.
- W2016454767 hasAuthorship W2016454767A5066184643 @default.
- W2016454767 hasBestOaLocation W20164547672 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C2778814963 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C2778987478 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C2779302907 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C2780395140 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C141071460 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C167135981 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C199343813 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C2775944032 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C2778814963 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C2778987478 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C2779302907 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C2780395140 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C71924100 @default.
- W2016454767 hasConceptScore W2016454767C81182388 @default.
- W2016454767 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2016454767 hasLocation W20164547671 @default.
- W2016454767 hasLocation W20164547672 @default.
- W2016454767 hasLocation W20164547673 @default.
- W2016454767 hasLocation W20164547674 @default.
- W2016454767 hasOpenAccess W2016454767 @default.
- W2016454767 hasPrimaryLocation W20164547671 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W1971540774 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W1975773336 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W2000153347 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W2016454767 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W2142519061 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W2352050269 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W2375517896 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W2388080723 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W2391274338 @default.
- W2016454767 hasRelatedWork W3141805052 @default.
- W2016454767 hasVolume "92" @default.
- W2016454767 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2016454767 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2016454767 magId "2016454767" @default.
- W2016454767 workType "article" @default.