Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016502092> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 94 of
94
with 100 items per page.
- W2016502092 endingPage "501" @default.
- W2016502092 startingPage "473" @default.
- W2016502092 abstract "A new concept of endolymph flow in the vertebrate vestibular system is presented. This approach describes quantitatively the flow in the entire system of three semicircular ducts interconnected by the utriculus and the crus commune. This approach is quite distinct from the classical theory in which the labyrinth is generally conceived to consist of three separate duct circuits. The present approach shows the following set of distinct differences to the classical view:o(a)In a labyrinth composed of three ducts perpendicular to each other the flow is non-zero in the other ducts when the labyrinth is rotated in the plane of a particular duct.(b)In a labyrinth with two equal ducts and with the duct planes under ≈73° the flow in one duct is zero when the rotation takes place in the plane of the other duct. Previous measurements of duct angles reflect this value surprisingly well.(c)The behaviour of the flow in the entire labyrinth is a non-linear function of direction or rotation (cf. points (d), (e)).(d)Six time constants for the entire labyrinth can be distinguished (three long, three short); the flow in a particular duct is composed of six terms with these time constants. The composition of this flow and thus the relative importance of the terms depends on the positioning of the labyrinth with respect to the rotation vector.(e)The time constants also depend, for different labyrinths, on a shared influence of the dimensions of the ducts and the elastic properties of all three cupulae.(f)The forces in a particular duct depend also on the amount of motion the fluid will acquire in the other ducts.(g)The sensitivity of a particular duct depends also on the dimensions of the other parts in the vestibular system.3.Equations for a system consisting of two ducts and for the classical single duct system are also given. Both systems are special cases of the three-duct system. The single duct equations are equivalent with equations given by Oman (1980) and Oman et al. (1987) which include the contribution of a wide utriculus.4.The present theory of endolymph flow is mainly supported by the outcome of previously performed experiments concerning time constants and rotation of human subjects in different planes. Measurements of relative dimensions of ducts, utriculus and crus commune are in accordance with considerations about sensitivity of the labyrinth which follow from our theory. However, additional evidence to verify our theory is needed. In a labyrinth composed of three ducts perpendicular to each other the flow is non-zero in the other ducts when the labyrinth is rotated in the plane of a particular duct. In a labyrinth with two equal ducts and with the duct planes under ≈73° the flow in one duct is zero when the rotation takes place in the plane of the other duct. Previous measurements of duct angles reflect this value surprisingly well. The behaviour of the flow in the entire labyrinth is a non-linear function of direction or rotation (cf. points (d), (e)). Six time constants for the entire labyrinth can be distinguished (three long, three short); the flow in a particular duct is composed of six terms with these time constants. The composition of this flow and thus the relative importance of the terms depends on the positioning of the labyrinth with respect to the rotation vector. The time constants also depend, for different labyrinths, on a shared influence of the dimensions of the ducts and the elastic properties of all three cupulae. The forces in a particular duct depend also on the amount of motion the fluid will acquire in the other ducts. The sensitivity of a particular duct depends also on the dimensions of the other parts in the vestibular system. Equations for a system consisting of two ducts and for the classical single duct system are also given. Both systems are special cases of the three-duct system. The single duct equations are equivalent with equations given by Oman (1980) and Oman et al. (1987) which include the contribution of a wide utriculus. The present theory of endolymph flow is mainly supported by the outcome of previously performed experiments concerning time constants and rotation of human subjects in different planes. Measurements of relative dimensions of ducts, utriculus and crus commune are in accordance with considerations about sensitivity of the labyrinth which follow from our theory. However, additional evidence to verify our theory is needed. An obtuse or sharp angle between duct planes can lead to better performance of a particular labyrinth because the “external impulses” in the different ducts may amplify or compensate each other." @default.
- W2016502092 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2016502092 creator A5021170869 @default.
- W2016502092 creator A5081291477 @default.
- W2016502092 date "1988-10-01" @default.
- W2016502092 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2016502092 title "A new quantitative model of total endolymph flow in the system of semicircular ducts" @default.
- W2016502092 cites W177293286 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W1969524955 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W1985635680 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2004154715 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2005868861 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2018626164 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2023893203 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2029015874 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2034739360 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2072617696 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2078761639 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2081087537 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2090096449 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2093106272 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2094895013 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2109386450 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2114232503 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2129758283 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2156035399 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2183473490 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2208351732 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2412964449 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2802889843 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W2921235504 @default.
- W2016502092 cites W4205302641 @default.
- W2016502092 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80053-5" @default.
- W2016502092 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3255007" @default.
- W2016502092 hasPublicationYear "1988" @default.
- W2016502092 type Work @default.
- W2016502092 sameAs 2016502092 @default.
- W2016502092 citedByCount "27" @default.
- W2016502092 countsByYear W20165020922016 @default.
- W2016502092 countsByYear W20165020922017 @default.
- W2016502092 countsByYear W20165020922018 @default.
- W2016502092 countsByYear W20165020922019 @default.
- W2016502092 countsByYear W20165020922020 @default.
- W2016502092 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2016502092 hasAuthorship W2016502092A5021170869 @default.
- W2016502092 hasAuthorship W2016502092A5081291477 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C199631012 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C2778500370 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C2778596372 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C2778969067 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C2781094566 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C2781212128 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C37222873 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C105702510 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C121332964 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C199631012 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C2524010 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C2778500370 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C2778596372 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C2778969067 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C2781094566 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C2781212128 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C33923547 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C37222873 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C57879066 @default.
- W2016502092 hasConceptScore W2016502092C86803240 @default.
- W2016502092 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2016502092 hasLocation W20165020921 @default.
- W2016502092 hasLocation W20165020922 @default.
- W2016502092 hasOpenAccess W2016502092 @default.
- W2016502092 hasPrimaryLocation W20165020921 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W1940961453 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W1971403829 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W1976389341 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W1988024464 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W1994075241 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W2016502092 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W2146931784 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W2316204487 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W2327227405 @default.
- W2016502092 hasRelatedWork W2432171985 @default.
- W2016502092 hasVolume "134" @default.
- W2016502092 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2016502092 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2016502092 magId "2016502092" @default.
- W2016502092 workType "article" @default.