FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016515419> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016515419 abstract "For the gamete and embryo donation community, it is well recognized that the implementation of a gamete and embryo donor registry (GEDR) represents a good initiative to ensure the best possible health conditions for donor-conceived individuals. Be they national, institutional or independent, GEDR can play a major role in the transmission of health-related genetic and medical information. However, from a bioethical analysis standpoint, GEDR raise many questions regarding the extent of their beneficent nature. Based on the recent Canadian GEDR aborted attempt, this article will focus on bioethical issues and paradoxes that can impact the wellbeing of donor-conceived individuals, half-siblings, donors and parents. On one hand, the implementation of a GEDR can be ethically justified as a beneficent action towards lessening harm associated with the transmission of hereditary disease and increasing the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic approaches. On the other hand, examined through the concept of nonpaternalistic beneficence, GEDR challenge us to recognize beneficiaries' free agency, as well as the importance to transmit reliable and pertinent information. Ultimately, beyond an individualistic application of the principle of beneficence, socioethics invite us to consider consistency with societal values as a prerequisite for achieving a common good. Because the issue of whether or not to protect the donor's anonymity occupies the forefront of the discussion surrounding gamete and embryo donation, there is less interest in other initiatives, which may be implemented to ensure the best possible medical and psychosocial conditions for donor-conceived individuals. In this article, we propose a bioethical analysis of the use of gamete and embryo donor registries (GEDR) from the angle of the principle of beneficence. More specifically, we will concentrate on the Canadian situation regarding GEDR. We will look at the strengths and pitfalls of this mechanism and suggest a solution to maximize the benefits of a GEDR. Many have suggested that such an initiative could have a beneficial impact on the wellbeing of donor-conceived individuals, half-siblings, donors and parents, by ensuring the constant flow of health-related medical and genetic information. As self-evident as the social acceptability of a GEDR may seem, we wish to show the limitations of the benefits that a registry is supposed to provide. We argue that a GEDR has to do more than simply transmit health-related information between parties. It also has to be based on pertinent and reliable data, be useful for health promotion and recognize beneficiaries' free agency. Ultimately, the implementation of a GEDR has to take into consideration wider social values." @default.
• W2016515419 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016515419 creator A5036535889 @default.
• W2016515419 creator A5038741757 @default.
• W2016515419 creator A5044079086 @default.
• W2016515419 creator A5055750206 @default.
• W2016515419 creator A5062707283 @default.
• W2016515419 date "2014-03-01" @default.
• W2016515419 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2016515419 title "Strengths and pitfalls of Canadian gamete and embryo donor registries: searching for beneficent solutions" @default.
• W2016515419 cites W119849247 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1495483837 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1543471922 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1931195638 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1971777665 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1973165285 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1989177936 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1998073790 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2001721190 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2003828923 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2013416331 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2016305798 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2017581497 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2020169059 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2021681892 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2028770837 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2042285788 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2044522118 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2060967205 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2076787547 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2078969619 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2086884652 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2091461813 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2091668486 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2092287721 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2097931347 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2099164949 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2106480554 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2111604798 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2115486845 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2125004014 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2137206235 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2143597238 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2150480418 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2161335652 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2168610667 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2169409325 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2173418711 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2175966884 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2176036934 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2329699378 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2335867780 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W2917067701 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W3122527269 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W3124755086 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W3176965354 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W91282301 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1508939995 @default.
• W2016515419 cites W1567609498 @default.
• W2016515419 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.020" @default.
• W2016515419 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24447960" @default.
• W2016515419 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2016515419 type Work @default.
• W2016515419 sameAs 2016515419 @default.
• W2016515419 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2016515419 countsByYear W20165154192018 @default.
• W2016515419 countsByYear W20165154192020 @default.
• W2016515419 countsByYear W20165154192021 @default.
• W2016515419 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016515419 hasAuthorship W2016515419A5036535889 @default.
• W2016515419 hasAuthorship W2016515419A5038741757 @default.
• W2016515419 hasAuthorship W2016515419A5044079086 @default.
• W2016515419 hasAuthorship W2016515419A5055750206 @default.
• W2016515419 hasAuthorship W2016515419A5062707283 @default.
• W2016515419 hasBestOaLocation W20165154191 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C117438556 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C188084074 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C2775933685 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C56181019 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C65414064 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C108170787 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C117438556 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C127413603 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C144024400 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C17744445 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C188084074 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C199539241 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C2775933685 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C2777363581 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C36289849 @default.
• W2016515419 hasConceptScore W2016515419C55587333 @default.

• next