FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016564982> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016564982 endingPage "S280" @default.
• W2016564982 startingPage "S280" @default.
• W2016564982 abstract "ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the IVF outcome and the embryological characteristics of donors who underwent mild stimulation compared with traditional COS.DesignRetrospective, observational.Materials and MethodsA total of 89 donors were divided into mild stimulation considered when the total dose of rFSH was <1,687 UI/per cycle (group 1) and conventional stimulation when total rFSH was >1,687 UI/per cycle (group 2). Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate were analyzed. Demographics from both groups were also analyzed. Statistical differences were analyzed with ANOVA.ResultsTabled 1Fresh embryo transfer dayMild stimulationConventional stimulation27(D+5)51.9%29(D+5)34.9%21(D+3)40.3%40(D+3)48.1%4(D+2)7.6%12(D+2)16.8% Open table in a new tab ConclusionThe mild stimulation in donor patients has some advantages like lowering risk of OHSS, better tolerance for patients and reduces the cost of IVF cycles and has similar outcomes as conventional stimulation. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the IVF outcome and the embryological characteristics of donors who underwent mild stimulation compared with traditional COS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the IVF outcome and the embryological characteristics of donors who underwent mild stimulation compared with traditional COS. DesignRetrospective, observational. Retrospective, observational. Materials and MethodsA total of 89 donors were divided into mild stimulation considered when the total dose of rFSH was <1,687 UI/per cycle (group 1) and conventional stimulation when total rFSH was >1,687 UI/per cycle (group 2). Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate were analyzed. Demographics from both groups were also analyzed. Statistical differences were analyzed with ANOVA. A total of 89 donors were divided into mild stimulation considered when the total dose of rFSH was <1,687 UI/per cycle (group 1) and conventional stimulation when total rFSH was >1,687 UI/per cycle (group 2). Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rate were analyzed. Demographics from both groups were also analyzed. Statistical differences were analyzed with ANOVA. ResultsTabled 1Fresh embryo transfer dayMild stimulationConventional stimulation27(D+5)51.9%29(D+5)34.9%21(D+3)40.3%40(D+3)48.1%4(D+2)7.6%12(D+2)16.8% Open table in a new tab ConclusionThe mild stimulation in donor patients has some advantages like lowering risk of OHSS, better tolerance for patients and reduces the cost of IVF cycles and has similar outcomes as conventional stimulation. The mild stimulation in donor patients has some advantages like lowering risk of OHSS, better tolerance for patients and reduces the cost of IVF cycles and has similar outcomes as conventional stimulation." @default.
• W2016564982 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016564982 creator A5023077373 @default.
• W2016564982 creator A5032362576 @default.
• W2016564982 creator A5050727546 @default.
• W2016564982 creator A5064647224 @default.
• W2016564982 creator A5069099524 @default.
• W2016564982 creator A5087476210 @default.
• W2016564982 date "2013-09-01" @default.
• W2016564982 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2016564982 title "Results of mild stimulation in oocyte donors: embryological characteristics and pregnancy outcome" @default.
• W2016564982 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1159" @default.
• W2016564982 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2016564982 type Work @default.
• W2016564982 sameAs 2016564982 @default.
• W2016564982 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2016564982 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016564982 hasAuthorship W2016564982A5023077373 @default.
• W2016564982 hasAuthorship W2016564982A5032362576 @default.
• W2016564982 hasAuthorship W2016564982A5050727546 @default.
• W2016564982 hasAuthorship W2016564982A5064647224 @default.
• W2016564982 hasAuthorship W2016564982A5069099524 @default.
• W2016564982 hasAuthorship W2016564982A5087476210 @default.
• W2016564982 hasBestOaLocation W20165649821 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C160099875 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C2776537878 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C2778279030 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C126322002 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C131872663 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C141071460 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C160099875 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C167135981 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C23131810 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C24998067 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C2776537878 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C2778279030 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C2779234561 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C29456083 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C54355233 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C71924100 @default.
• W2016564982 hasConceptScore W2016564982C86803240 @default.
• W2016564982 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2016564982 hasLocation W20165649821 @default.
• W2016564982 hasOpenAccess W2016564982 @default.
• W2016564982 hasPrimaryLocation W20165649821 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W2141496075 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W2352199800 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W2355835144 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W2396234584 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W2410489401 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W3005697888 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W3029602502 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W3031289051 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W3195912706 @default.
• W2016564982 hasRelatedWork W3217696192 @default.
• W2016564982 hasVolume "100" @default.
• W2016564982 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2016564982 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2016564982 magId "2016564982" @default.
• W2016564982 workType "article" @default.