FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016611709> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016611709 endingPage "967" @default.
• W2016611709 startingPage "959" @default.
• W2016611709 abstract "The selection consequences of competition in plants have been traditionally interpreted based on a “size-advantage” hypothesis – that is, under intense crowding/competition from neighbors, natural selection generally favors capacity for a relatively large plant body size. However, this conflicts with abundant data, showing that resident species body size distributions are usually strongly right-skewed at virtually all scales within vegetation. Using surveys within sample plots and a neighbor-removal experiment, we tested: (1) whether resident species that have a larger maximum potential body size (MAX) generally have more successful local individual recruitment, and thus greater local abundance/density (as predicted by the traditional size-advantage hypothesis); and (2) whether there is a general between-species trade-off relationship between MAX and capacity to produce offspring when body size is severely suppressed by crowding/competition – that is, whether resident species with a larger MAX generally also need to reach a larger minimum reproductive threshold size (MIN) before they can reproduce at all. The results showed that MIN had a positive relationship with MAX across resident species, and local density – as well as local density of just reproductive individuals – was generally greater for species with smaller MIN (and hence smaller MAX). In addition, the cleared neighborhoods of larger target species (which had relatively large MIN) generally had – in the following growing season – a lower ratio of conspecific recruitment within these neighborhoods relative to recruitment of other (i.e., smaller) species (which had generally smaller MIN). These data are consistent with an alternative hypothesis based on a ‘reproductive-economy-advantage’ – that is, superior fitness under competition in plants generally requires not larger potential body size, but rather superior capacity to recruit offspring that are in turn capable of producing grand-offspring – and hence transmitting genes to future generations – despite intense and persistent (cross-generational) crowding/competition from near neighbors. Selection for the latter is expected to favor relatively small minimum reproductive threshold size and hence – as a tradeoff – relatively small (not large) potential body size." @default.
• W2016611709 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016611709 creator A5005865488 @default.
• W2016611709 creator A5068293412 @default.
• W2016611709 date "2014-02-25" @default.
• W2016611709 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2016611709 title "Revising traditional theory on the link between plant body size and fitness under competition: evidence from old‐field vegetation" @default.
• W2016611709 cites W1542242179 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W1573729459 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W1591474892 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W1969835097 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W1981968821 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W1985958360 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2004981487 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2008888153 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2019701914 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2035963255 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2044498903 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2049280900 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2054850558 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2065777510 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2086944389 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2103408435 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2110749432 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2114777092 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2118428712 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2150003621 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2153008496 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2161003050 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2165903616 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2171506130 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2317203148 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W2509785250 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W4230746451 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W4240943610 @default.
• W2016611709 cites W4301296125 @default.
• W2016611709 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1001" @default.
• W2016611709 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3997313" @default.
• W2016611709 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24772274" @default.
• W2016611709 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2016611709 type Work @default.
• W2016611709 sameAs 2016611709 @default.
• W2016611709 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092015 @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092016 @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092017 @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092018 @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092019 @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092021 @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092022 @default.
• W2016611709 countsByYear W20166117092023 @default.
• W2016611709 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016611709 hasAuthorship W2016611709A5005865488 @default.
• W2016611709 hasAuthorship W2016611709A5068293412 @default.
• W2016611709 hasBestOaLocation W20166117091 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C129848803 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C149333683 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C153026981 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C2776133958 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C47019633 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C77077793 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConcept C91306197 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C105795698 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C129848803 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C142724271 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C144024400 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C149333683 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C149923435 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C153026981 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C169760540 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C18903297 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C2776133958 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C2908647359 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C33923547 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C47019633 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C71924100 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C77077793 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C86803240 @default.
• W2016611709 hasConceptScore W2016611709C91306197 @default.
• W2016611709 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2016611709 hasLocation W20166117091 @default.
• W2016611709 hasLocation W20166117092 @default.
• W2016611709 hasLocation W20166117093 @default.
• W2016611709 hasLocation W20166117094 @default.
• W2016611709 hasOpenAccess W2016611709 @default.
• W2016611709 hasPrimaryLocation W20166117091 @default.
• W2016611709 hasRelatedWork W1984640867 @default.
• W2016611709 hasRelatedWork W1986904488 @default.

• next