FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016650672> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016650672 endingPage "673" @default.
• W2016650672 startingPage "669" @default.
• W2016650672 abstract "ObjectiveThe aim was to examine the effect of various surgical maneuvers during standard surgery for small saphenous varicose veins (SSV).MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study of patients that underwent small saphenous varicose vein surgery. Two-hundred nineteen consecutive patients (234 legs) with isolated primary or recurrent small saphenous varicose veins undergoing surgery were enrolled in a multicenter study involving nine vascular centers in the United Kingdom. Operative technique was determined by individual surgeon preference; clinical and operative details, including the use of stripping, were recorded. Clinical examination (recurrence rates) and duplex imaging (superficial and deep incompetence) were evaluated at six weeks and one year after surgery.ResultsA total of 204 legs were reviewed at one year; 67 had small saphenous varicose vein stripping, 116 had saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) disconnection only, and the remainder had miscellaneous procedures. The incidence of visible recurrent varicosities at one year was lower after SSV stripping (12 of 67, 18%) than after disconnection only (28 of 116, 24%), although this did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in the rate of numbness at one year between those who had SSV stripping (20 of 71, 28%) and those who had disconnection only (38 of 134, 28%). The rate of SPJ incompetence detected by duplex at one year was significantly lower in patients who underwent SSV stripping (9 of 67, 13%) than in those who did not (37 of 115, 32%) (P < .01).ConclusionStripping of the SSV significantly reduced the rate of SPJ incompetence after one year without increasing the rate of complications. The aim was to examine the effect of various surgical maneuvers during standard surgery for small saphenous varicose veins (SSV). This was a prospective cohort study of patients that underwent small saphenous varicose vein surgery. Two-hundred nineteen consecutive patients (234 legs) with isolated primary or recurrent small saphenous varicose veins undergoing surgery were enrolled in a multicenter study involving nine vascular centers in the United Kingdom. Operative technique was determined by individual surgeon preference; clinical and operative details, including the use of stripping, were recorded. Clinical examination (recurrence rates) and duplex imaging (superficial and deep incompetence) were evaluated at six weeks and one year after surgery. A total of 204 legs were reviewed at one year; 67 had small saphenous varicose vein stripping, 116 had saphenopopliteal junction (SPJ) disconnection only, and the remainder had miscellaneous procedures. The incidence of visible recurrent varicosities at one year was lower after SSV stripping (12 of 67, 18%) than after disconnection only (28 of 116, 24%), although this did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in the rate of numbness at one year between those who had SSV stripping (20 of 71, 28%) and those who had disconnection only (38 of 134, 28%). The rate of SPJ incompetence detected by duplex at one year was significantly lower in patients who underwent SSV stripping (9 of 67, 13%) than in those who did not (37 of 115, 32%) (P < .01). Stripping of the SSV significantly reduced the rate of SPJ incompetence after one year without increasing the rate of complications." @default.
• W2016650672 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016650672 creator A5008639007 @default.
• W2016650672 creator A5017416460 @default.
• W2016650672 creator A5037459815 @default.
• W2016650672 creator A5040188260 @default.
• W2016650672 creator A5085126867 @default.
• W2016650672 creator A5088065505 @default.
• W2016650672 date "2008-09-01" @default.
• W2016650672 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2016650672 title "A prospective evaluation of the outcome after small saphenous varicose vein surgery with one-year follow-up" @default.
• W2016650672 cites W1974180547 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W1991258273 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W1996350698 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W1998154509 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2016120822 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2037477000 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2039385692 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2044145792 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2049964571 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2062631043 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2087566032 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2089768997 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2090168704 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2095838368 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2099262802 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2133672069 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2144126113 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2159731163 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2171278632 @default.
• W2016650672 cites W2496773732 @default.
• W2016650672 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.04.041" @default.
• W2016650672 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18586437" @default.
• W2016650672 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2016650672 type Work @default.
• W2016650672 sameAs 2016650672 @default.
• W2016650672 citedByCount "50" @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722012 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722013 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722014 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722015 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722016 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722017 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722018 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722019 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722021 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722022 @default.
• W2016650672 countsByYear W20166506722023 @default.
• W2016650672 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016650672 hasAuthorship W2016650672A5008639007 @default.
• W2016650672 hasAuthorship W2016650672A5017416460 @default.
• W2016650672 hasAuthorship W2016650672A5037459815 @default.
• W2016650672 hasAuthorship W2016650672A5040188260 @default.
• W2016650672 hasAuthorship W2016650672A5085126867 @default.
• W2016650672 hasAuthorship W2016650672A5088065505 @default.
• W2016650672 hasBestOaLocation W20166506721 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConcept C2777475103 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConcept C2779480337 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConcept C2910595225 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConceptScore W2016650672C141071460 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConceptScore W2016650672C188816634 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConceptScore W2016650672C2777475103 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConceptScore W2016650672C2779480337 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConceptScore W2016650672C2910595225 @default.
• W2016650672 hasConceptScore W2016650672C71924100 @default.
• W2016650672 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2016650672 hasLocation W20166506721 @default.
• W2016650672 hasLocation W20166506722 @default.
• W2016650672 hasOpenAccess W2016650672 @default.
• W2016650672 hasPrimaryLocation W20166506721 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W158244561 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2093910916 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2154362091 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2372299581 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2382738253 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2384426257 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2578416777 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2806612142 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W4362474471 @default.
• W2016650672 hasRelatedWork W2183037257 @default.
• W2016650672 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W2016650672 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2016650672 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2016650672 magId "2016650672" @default.
• W2016650672 workType "article" @default.