FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016753218> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016753218 abstract "You have accessJournal of UrologyTechnology & Instruments: Surgical Education & Skills Assessment1 Apr 20111480 COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC SURGERY SKILL ACQUISITION BETWEEN DV-TRAINER AND DA VINCI&[REG] SURGICAL SYSTEM: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY Ruslan Korets, Adam C. Mues, Joseph A. Graversen, Mantu Gupta, Jaime Landman, and Ketan K. Badani Ruslan KoretsRuslan Korets New York, NY More articles by this author , Adam C. MuesAdam C. Mues New York, NY More articles by this author , Joseph A. GraversenJoseph A. Graversen New York, NY More articles by this author , Mantu GuptaMantu Gupta New York, NY More articles by this author , Jaime LandmanJaime Landman Orange, CA More articles by this author , and Ketan K. BadaniKetan K. Badani New York, NY More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1438AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Currently, no standardized curriculum exists for robotic surgical education. Training courses using the da Vinci® surgical system (dVSS) on inanimate or, less commonly, animal models are limited and expensive, further diminishing the training opportunities for naïve surgeons to develop their skills before attempting live cases. The Mimic dV-Trainer (MdVT) is a compact hardware platform that closely reproduces the experience of the dVSS console. The primary objective was to compare robotic surgery skill acquisition of resident trainees using MdVT and dVSS. METHODS Sixteen urology trainees were randomized into three groups. A baseline evaluation using dVSS was performed consisting of two exercises requiring endowrist manipulation (EM), camera movement (CM), needle control (NC), and robotic suturing (RS) as well as completion of a self-assessment questionnaire. Group 1 and 2 completed a standardized training curriculum on MdVT and dVSS, respectively, while Group 3 received no additional training. The MdVT curriculum was designed to train subjects in EM and CM, while the dVSS training set consisted of all exercises evaluated during baseline evaluation. After completion of the training phase, all trainees completed a secondary evaluation on dVSS consisting of same exercises performed during baseline evaluation. Performance was evaluated using Objective Structured Assessments of Technical Skill technique. RESULTS The three groups were well balanced with regard to urology training level and prior robotic surgery experience. There was no difference in baseline performance scores across the 3 groups. While the control group showed no significant improvement in EM/CM domain (p=0.15), Group 1 and 2 had statistically significant improvement in EM/CM domain p=0.039 and p=0.007, respectively. The difference in improvement between Group 1 and Group 2 was not statistically different (p=0.21). Only the trainees trained in the NC and RS (Group 2), showed significant improvement in that domain during secondary evaluation (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS Curriculum-based training with either MdVT or dVSS significantly improved robotic surgery aptitude when compared to no training. Furthermore, there was no difference in improvement during secondary evaluation for the exercises shared between MdVT and dVSS groups, suggesting that MdVT is equivalent to dVSS for improving robotic aptitude in EM and CM. Follow-up studies are necessary to assess the efficacy of MdVT over a wider spectrum of domains. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e593 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ruslan Korets New York, NY More articles by this author Adam C. Mues New York, NY More articles by this author Joseph A. Graversen New York, NY More articles by this author Mantu Gupta New York, NY More articles by this author Jaime Landman Orange, CA More articles by this author Ketan K. Badani New York, NY More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2016753218 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016753218 creator A5024221457 @default.
• W2016753218 creator A5030619277 @default.
• W2016753218 creator A5045151975 @default.
• W2016753218 creator A5074733101 @default.
• W2016753218 creator A5078086666 @default.
• W2016753218 creator A5082924158 @default.
• W2016753218 date "2011-04-01" @default.
• W2016753218 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2016753218 title "1480 COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC SURGERY SKILL ACQUISITION BETWEEN DV-TRAINER AND DA VINCI&[REG] SURGICAL SYSTEM: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY" @default.
• W2016753218 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.1438" @default.
• W2016753218 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2016753218 type Work @default.
• W2016753218 sameAs 2016753218 @default.
• W2016753218 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2016753218 countsByYear W20167532182012 @default.
• W2016753218 countsByYear W20167532182013 @default.
• W2016753218 countsByYear W20167532182015 @default.
• W2016753218 countsByYear W20167532182016 @default.
• W2016753218 countsByYear W20167532182017 @default.
• W2016753218 countsByYear W20167532182018 @default.
• W2016753218 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016753218 hasAuthorship W2016753218A5024221457 @default.
• W2016753218 hasAuthorship W2016753218A5030619277 @default.
• W2016753218 hasAuthorship W2016753218A5045151975 @default.
• W2016753218 hasAuthorship W2016753218A5074733101 @default.
• W2016753218 hasAuthorship W2016753218A5078086666 @default.
• W2016753218 hasAuthorship W2016753218A5082924158 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C103203806 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C2776774875 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C2780463512 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C103203806 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C141071460 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C154945302 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C15744967 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C168563851 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C19417346 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C199360897 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C2776774875 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C2780463512 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C41008148 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C47177190 @default.
• W2016753218 hasConceptScore W2016753218C71924100 @default.
• W2016753218 hasIssue "4S" @default.
• W2016753218 hasLocation W20167532181 @default.
• W2016753218 hasOpenAccess W2016753218 @default.
• W2016753218 hasPrimaryLocation W20167532181 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W1194883157 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W1996147141 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W2012100075 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W2068870225 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W2148041822 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W2152630500 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W2560019223 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W2770048430 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W3025683600 @default.
• W2016753218 hasRelatedWork W3140583598 @default.
• W2016753218 hasVolume "185" @default.
• W2016753218 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2016753218 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2016753218 magId "2016753218" @default.
• W2016753218 workType "article" @default.