FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016809794> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2016809794 abstract "Objective: This prospective clinical study was conducted between July 2003- June 2005 at Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh to make a comparative evaluation of the outcome of skin graft on patients of postburn contractures of the fingers using integrated scores for measuring several outcomes together. Materials & Methods: A total of 56 subjects of postburn contractures of the fingers were selected consecutively and were evaluated at baseline by number of digits affected, surface area involved, extension deficit, fingers with maximum extension deficit and duration of contracture. Thirty two subjects were assigned to Full-thickness skin graft group (Group-A) and 24 to Split-thickness skin graft group (Group-B). Respective graft coverage was applied to the wound following release of contracture. Immediate outcome was evaluated in terms of graft take and number of graft-site complications, while follow up outcome was evaluated in terms of extension deficit six months after correction using specific scores for defined outcome. Results: Over 70% of the subjects were < 15 years with mean ages of Group-A and Group-B were 9.38 ± 1.66 and 9.94 ± 1.42 years respectively. In both groups maximum extension deficit was found in little finger (78% in Group- A and 54% in Group-B). The Interphalangeal (IP) joints were observed to be most frequently involved (78% in Group-A and 75% in Group-B). The duration of contracture, number of digits involved and surface area of the fingers involved were almost identically distributed between the groups. Outcome shows that donor-site morbidities (discolouration and hypertrophic scars) were significantly less in Group-A compared to that in Group- B (p < 0.001 and p = 0.047). Similarly the Group-A was significantly superior compared to Group-B in terms of minimal extension deficit (0 - 10°) 6 months after correction (59.4% vs. 25%, P < 0.05). About two-third of the subjects in both the groups demonstrated 100% graft take and around 80% had 2 or < 2 graft-site morbidities. The excellent outcome was significantly higher in Group- A (37.5%) than that in Group-B (12.5%) (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Full-thickness skin graft is a better option of intervention than Split-thickness skin graft for coverage after release of contracture. However, the findings need to he validated by a larger sample size. Key words: Postburn flexion deformity, full-thickness skin graft, split-thickness skin graft, graft take, donor-site morbidity, graft-site morbidity and extension deficit. DOI: 10.3329/jbcps.v27i1.4240 J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2009; 27: 25-29" @default.
• W2016809794 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2016809794 creator A5030816199 @default.
• W2016809794 creator A5048324758 @default.
• W2016809794 date "1970-01-01" @default.
• W2016809794 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2016809794 title "Outcome of Skin Graft in Postburn Finger Contractures: An Integrated Technique of Evaluation" @default.
• W2016809794 cites W1973519291 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W1976278485 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W2033963815 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W2041897532 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W2046229312 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W2057316939 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W2073798057 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W2406972717 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W242744402 @default.
• W2016809794 cites W2467262763 @default.
• W2016809794 doi "https://doi.org/10.3329/jbcps.v27i1.4240" @default.
• W2016809794 hasPublicationYear "1970" @default.
• W2016809794 type Work @default.
• W2016809794 sameAs 2016809794 @default.
• W2016809794 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2016809794 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2016809794 hasAuthorship W2016809794A5030816199 @default.
• W2016809794 hasAuthorship W2016809794A5048324758 @default.
• W2016809794 hasBestOaLocation W20168097941 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConcept C127607297 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConcept C2776937108 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConcept C2777785397 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConceptScore W2016809794C127607297 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConceptScore W2016809794C141071460 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConceptScore W2016809794C2776937108 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConceptScore W2016809794C2777785397 @default.
• W2016809794 hasConceptScore W2016809794C71924100 @default.
• W2016809794 hasLocation W20168097941 @default.
• W2016809794 hasOpenAccess W2016809794 @default.
• W2016809794 hasPrimaryLocation W20168097941 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W1970822127 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2054877616 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2085385902 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2087269108 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2090333842 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2092323025 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2121140151 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2140273460 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2158297937 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2329930572 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2374906896 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2388585363 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2394991515 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2611287212 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2894523383 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2903485722 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2953067975 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W2960751475 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W3030159072 @default.
• W2016809794 hasRelatedWork W3139574296 @default.
• W2016809794 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2016809794 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2016809794 magId "2016809794" @default.
• W2016809794 workType "article" @default.