Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2016812791> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 80 of
80
with 100 items per page.
- W2016812791 endingPage "188" @default.
- W2016812791 startingPage "175" @default.
- W2016812791 abstract "Welded hemispherical or spherical shells in practice have initial geometric imperfections in them that are random in nature. These imperfections determine the buckling resistance of a shell to external pressure but their magnitudes will not be known until after the shell has been built. If suitable simplified, but realistic, imperfection shapes can be found, then a reasonably accurate theoretical prediction of a spherical shell's buckling/collapse pressure should be possible at the design stage. The main aim of the present paper is to show that the test results obtained at the David Taylor Model Basin (DTMB) on 28 welded hemispherical shells (having diameters of 0.75 and 1.68 m) can be predicted quite well using such simplified shape imperfections. This was done in two ways. In the first, equations for determining the theoretical collapse pressures of externally pressurized imperfect spherical shells were utilized. The only imperfection parameter used in these equations is δ 0 , the amplitude of the inward radial deviation of the pole of the shell. Two values for δ 0 were studied but the best overall agreement between test and theory was found using δ 0 = 0.05 ✓ (Rt). This produced ratios of experimental to numerical collapse pressures in the range 0.98–1.30 (in most cases the test result was the higher). The second approach also used simplified imperfection shapes, but in conjunction with the shell buckling program BOSOR 5. The arc length of the imperfection was taken as s imp = k ✓ (Rt) (with k = 3.0 or 3.5) and its amplitude as δ 0 = 0.05√(Rt). Using this procedure on the 28 DTMB shells gave satisfactory agreement between the experimental and the computer predictions (in the range 0.92–1.20). These results are very encouraging. The foregoing method is, however, only a first step in the computerized buckling design of welded spherical shells and it needs to be checked against spherical shells having other values of R/t. In addition, more experimental information on the initial geometric imperfections in welded spherical shells (and how they vary with R/t) is desirable. A comparison is also given in the paper of the collapse pressures of spherical shells, as obtained from codes, with those predicted by computer analyses when the maximum shape deviations allowed by the codes are employed in the computer programs. The computed collapse pressures are frequently higher than the values given by the buckling strength curves in the codes. On the other hand, some amplitudes of imperfections studied in the paper give acceptable results. It would be helpful to designers if agreement could be reached on an imperfection shape (amplitude and arc length) that was generally acceptable. Residual stresses are not considered in this paper. They might be expected to decrease a spherical shell's buckling resistance to external pressure. However, experimentally, this does not always happen." @default.
- W2016812791 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2016812791 creator A5012361911 @default.
- W2016812791 creator A5072588875 @default.
- W2016812791 date "1991-05-01" @default.
- W2016812791 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2016812791 title "Buckling Design of Imperfect Welded Hemispherical Shells Subjected to External Pressure" @default.
- W2016812791 cites W2006139735 @default.
- W2016812791 cites W2007438575 @default.
- W2016812791 cites W2032250610 @default.
- W2016812791 cites W2043026683 @default.
- W2016812791 cites W2045481283 @default.
- W2016812791 cites W3021954294 @default.
- W2016812791 doi "https://doi.org/10.1243/pime_proc_1991_205_108_02" @default.
- W2016812791 hasPublicationYear "1991" @default.
- W2016812791 type Work @default.
- W2016812791 sameAs 2016812791 @default.
- W2016812791 citedByCount "25" @default.
- W2016812791 countsByYear W20168127912012 @default.
- W2016812791 countsByYear W20168127912013 @default.
- W2016812791 countsByYear W20168127912018 @default.
- W2016812791 countsByYear W20168127912019 @default.
- W2016812791 countsByYear W20168127912020 @default.
- W2016812791 countsByYear W20168127912022 @default.
- W2016812791 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2016812791 hasAuthorship W2016812791A5012361911 @default.
- W2016812791 hasAuthorship W2016812791A5072588875 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C108280814 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C180205008 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C19474535 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C204323151 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C2780310539 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C2781052500 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConcept C85476182 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C108280814 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C120665830 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C121332964 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C127413603 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C138885662 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C159985019 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C180205008 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C192562407 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C19474535 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C204323151 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C2780310539 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C2781052500 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C41895202 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C57879066 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C66938386 @default.
- W2016812791 hasConceptScore W2016812791C85476182 @default.
- W2016812791 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2016812791 hasLocation W20168127911 @default.
- W2016812791 hasOpenAccess W2016812791 @default.
- W2016812791 hasPrimaryLocation W20168127911 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W1981166256 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W2030241399 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W2053459300 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W2073323073 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W2091209507 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W221966734 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W2274459452 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W2327733734 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W2885877208 @default.
- W2016812791 hasRelatedWork W3092625298 @default.
- W2016812791 hasVolume "205" @default.
- W2016812791 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2016812791 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2016812791 magId "2016812791" @default.
- W2016812791 workType "article" @default.