FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017009757> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017009757 endingPage "1188" @default.
• W2017009757 startingPage "1174" @default.
• W2017009757 abstract "Research Article| September 01, 1990 Kinematic model of a continuous Heart Mountain allochthon THOMAS A. HAUGE THOMAS A. HAUGE 1Exxon Production Research Company, P.O. Box 2189, Houston, Texas 77252-2189 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar GSA Bulletin (1990) 102 (9): 1174–1188. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<1174:KMOACH>2.3.CO;2 Article history first online: 01 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation THOMAS A. HAUGE; Kinematic model of a continuous Heart Mountain allochthon. GSA Bulletin 1990;; 102 (9): 1174–1188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<1174:KMOACH>2.3.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract Two fundamentally different models describing the geometry, kinematics, and mechanism of emplacement of the allochthon of the Heart Mountain detachment have been advocated. The traditional tectonic denudation model comprises catastrophic gravity sliding of numerous detached blocks, with widespread subaerial exposure of the detachment by tectonic denudation. In this view, catastrophic volcanism covered the allochthonous blocks and the denuded detachment immediately after emplacement of the slide blocks. The alternative continuous allochthon model comprises noncatastrophic gravity spreading of a continuous allochthon, without tectonic denudation of the detachment. In this view, volcanism was noncatastrophic and predominantly coeval with, rather than subsequent to, faulting, and volcanic rocks constitute a large volume of the allochthon. Recent field studies indicate that the continuous allochthon model is geometrically and kinematically in accord with field relationships, analog models, geometric models, and relationships characterizing other detachment complexes, whereas the tectonic denudation model is not similarly substantiated. In particular, the tectonic denudation model is disproven by field relationships which demonstrate that volcanic rocks once thought to postdate faulting were instead tectonically emplaced. In addition, theoretical studies indicate that emplacement of the allochthon envisioned in the continuous allochthon model is mechanically plausible, whereas the catastrophic emplacement of detached blocks envisioned in the tectonic denudation model is mechanically implausible. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access." @default.
• W2017009757 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017009757 creator A5088424368 @default.
• W2017009757 date "1990-09-01" @default.
• W2017009757 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2017009757 title "Kinematic model of a continuous Heart Mountain allochthon" @default.
• W2017009757 doi "https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1990)102<1174:kmoach>2.3.co;2" @default.
• W2017009757 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
• W2017009757 type Work @default.
• W2017009757 sameAs 2017009757 @default.
• W2017009757 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W2017009757 countsByYear W20170097572012 @default.
• W2017009757 countsByYear W20170097572013 @default.
• W2017009757 countsByYear W20170097572014 @default.
• W2017009757 countsByYear W20170097572015 @default.
• W2017009757 countsByYear W20170097572017 @default.
• W2017009757 countsByYear W20170097572018 @default.
• W2017009757 countsByYear W20170097572022 @default.
• W2017009757 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017009757 hasAuthorship W2017009757A5088424368 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConcept C153220577 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConcept C2776520773 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConcept C77928131 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConceptScore W2017009757C127313418 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConceptScore W2017009757C151730666 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConceptScore W2017009757C153220577 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConceptScore W2017009757C2776520773 @default.
• W2017009757 hasConceptScore W2017009757C77928131 @default.
• W2017009757 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2017009757 hasLocation W20170097571 @default.
• W2017009757 hasOpenAccess W2017009757 @default.
• W2017009757 hasPrimaryLocation W20170097571 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2005016112 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2032957110 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2065211463 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W20957687 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2106699428 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2120443003 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2144763195 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2267683994 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2332837144 @default.
• W2017009757 hasRelatedWork W2084394744 @default.
• W2017009757 hasVolume "102" @default.
• W2017009757 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2017009757 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2017009757 magId "2017009757" @default.
• W2017009757 workType "article" @default.