FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017016280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017016280 abstract "To evaluate the effect of plan parameters on volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) dosimetric accuracy, together with the possibility of scoring plan complexity.142 clinical VMAT plans initially optimized using a 4° control point (CP) separation were evaluated. All plans were delivered by a 6 MV Linac to a biplanar diode array for patient-specific quality assurance (QA). Local Γ index analysis (3%, 3 mm and 2%, 2 mm) enabled the comparison between delivered and calculated dose. The following parameters were considered for each plan: average leaf travel (LT), modulation complexity score applied to VMAT (MCSv), MU value, and a multiplicative combination of LT and MCSv (LTMCS). Pearson's correlation analysis was performed between Γ passing rates and each parameter. The effects of CP angular separation on VMAT dosimetric accuracy were also analyzed by focusing on plans with high LT values. Forty out of 142 plans with LT above 350 mm were further optimized using a finer angle spacing (3° or 2°) and Γ analysis was performed. The average Γ passing rates obtained at 4° and at 3°∕2° sampling were compared. A further correlation analysis between all parameters and the Γ pass-rates was performed on 142 plans, but including the newly optimized 40 plans (CP every 3° or 2°) in place of the old ones (CP every 4°).A moderate significant (p < 0.05) correlation between each examined parameter and Γ passing rates was observed for the original 142 plans at 4° CP discretization. A negative correlation was found for LT with Pearson's r absolute values above 0.6, suggesting that a lower dosimetric accuracy may be expected for higher LT values when a 4° CP sampling is used. A positive correlation was observed for MCSv and LTMCS with r values above 0.5. In order to score plan complexity, threshold values of LTMCS were defined. The average Γ passing rates were significantly higher for the plans created using the finer CP spacing (3°∕2°) compared to the plans optimized using the standard 4° spacing (Student t-test p < 0.05). The correlation between LT and passing rates was strongly diminished when plans with finer angular separations were considered, yielding Pearson's r absolute values below 0.45.At 4° CP sampling, LT, MCSv, and LTMCS were found to be significantly correlated with VMAT dosimetric accuracy, expressed as Γ pass-rates. These parameters were found to be possible candidates for scoring plan complexity using threshold values. A finer CP separation (3°∕2°) led to a significant increase in dosimetric accuracy for plans with high leaf travel values, and to a decrease in correlation between LT and Γ passing rates. These results indicated that the influence of LT on VMAT dosimetric accuracy can be controlled by reducing CP separation. CP spacing for all plans requiring large leaf motion should not exceed 3°. The reported data were integrated to optimize our clinical workflow for plan creation, optimization, selection among rival plans, and patient-specific QA of VMAT treatments." @default.
• W2017016280 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017016280 creator A5002239205 @default.
• W2017016280 creator A5018877673 @default.
• W2017016280 creator A5022108082 @default.
• W2017016280 creator A5046176016 @default.
• W2017016280 creator A5064686673 @default.
• W2017016280 date "2013-06-18" @default.
• W2017016280 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2017016280 title "Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy" @default.
• W2017016280 cites W1965827467 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W1967121735 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W1973715126 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2013125175 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2014911369 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2030442960 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2040809797 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2048120740 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2070507058 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2081940723 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2084851290 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2094639450 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2096800361 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2109688980 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2140044955 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2145170673 @default.
• W2017016280 cites W2150863921 @default.
• W2017016280 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4810969" @default.
• W2017016280 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23822422" @default.
• W2017016280 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2017016280 type Work @default.
• W2017016280 sameAs 2017016280 @default.
• W2017016280 citedByCount "183" @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802014 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802015 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802016 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802017 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802018 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802019 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802020 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802021 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802022 @default.
• W2017016280 countsByYear W20170162802023 @default.
• W2017016280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017016280 hasAuthorship W2017016280A5002239205 @default.
• W2017016280 hasAuthorship W2017016280A5018877673 @default.
• W2017016280 hasAuthorship W2017016280A5022108082 @default.
• W2017016280 hasAuthorship W2017016280A5046176016 @default.
• W2017016280 hasAuthorship W2017016280A5064686673 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C106436119 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C2778618615 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C55078378 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C105795698 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C106436119 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C117220453 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C142724271 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C2524010 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C2778618615 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C2989005 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C33923547 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C55078378 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C71924100 @default.
• W2017016280 hasConceptScore W2017016280C75088862 @default.
• W2017016280 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2017016280 hasLocation W20170162801 @default.
• W2017016280 hasLocation W20170162802 @default.
• W2017016280 hasOpenAccess W2017016280 @default.
• W2017016280 hasPrimaryLocation W20170162801 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W2014529756 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W2344731424 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W2512421757 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W2774201806 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W3013810674 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W3107500641 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W4200439127 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W4241099569 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W45329928 @default.
• W2017016280 hasRelatedWork W3111706109 @default.
• W2017016280 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2017016280 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2017016280 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2017016280 magId "2017016280" @default.
• W2017016280 workType "article" @default.