FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017122850> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017122850 endingPage "580" @default.
• W2017122850 startingPage "575" @default.
• W2017122850 abstract "Hemoclip therapy is a well-established procedure in the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. Although new products are provided periodically by the industry, comparative investigations are lacking. We compared two different hemoclip devices in an experimental setting, assessing them using objective hemostatic parameters.We compared two disposable clip devices (Olympus HX-200L-135 (n = 40) vs. Wilson-Cook Tri-Clip (n = 40)) in an experimental setting using the compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (compactEASIE) training model equipped with an upper gastrointestinal-organ package for bleeding simulation. This was a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Four investigators with different levels of endoscopic experience applied ten hemoclip devices of each type to the spurting vessels, the clips allocated using a randomized list for each investigator. The efficacy of hemostasis was determined by continuous measurement of the pressure within the afferent vessel before and after clip application and calculation of the relative reduction of vessel diameter by the clip device. The system pressure was recorded over the period from 1 minute before to 1 minute after clip application. A secondary end point was a subjective assessment of the whole clip application procedure by the endoscopist and the assisting nurse, using a visual analog scale (0 - 100, with 100 representing the best experience).A total of 39/40 clips of each type were applied successfully. Both clip devices led to a significant increase in system pressure, representing significant relative reduction of vessel diameter (Olympus 5.4 +/- 7.5 %, p < 0.001; Cook 4.9 +/- 8.0 %, p < 0.001). Overall, there was no significant difference between the two devices ( P = 0.756). However, the investigator with the least experience in endoscopy (< 100 procedures) produced significantly inferior results compared with the other three investigators, who had performed between 2000 and 6000 procedures each ( P < 0.05). We found no evidence of a learning curve from the intra-observer results. The devices received good, but not significantly different, overall ratings by the endoscopists (Olympus 69 +/- 24 vs. Wilson-Cook 65 +/- 16) and by the assisting nurses (Olympus 77 +/- 9 vs. Wilson-Cook 70 +/- 22).Using an established cadaveric training model, no significant difference was found between the two types of hemoclip devices with respect to their hemostatic efficacy. However, the experience of the endoscopist appears to play a major role in successful clip application. The use of a feedback mechanism in emergency endoscopy training, using continuous intravessel pressure monitoring, may substantially enhance the efficacy of training, resulting in a similar improvement in clinical results." @default.
• W2017122850 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5008003126 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5024478430 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5026961297 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5042041117 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5042509490 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5043320921 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5073927591 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5086959830 @default.
• W2017122850 creator A5078987589 @default.
• W2017122850 date "2006-06-01" @default.
• W2017122850 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2017122850 title "“Hemodynamic Efficacy” of two Endoscopic Clip Devices Used in the Treatment of Bleeding Vessels, Tested in an Experimental Setting Using the Compact Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (compactEASIE) Training Model" @default.
• W2017122850 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-925000" @default.
• W2017122850 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16802269" @default.
• W2017122850 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2017122850 type Work @default.
• W2017122850 sameAs 2017122850 @default.
• W2017122850 citedByCount "25" @default.
• W2017122850 countsByYear W20171228502012 @default.
• W2017122850 countsByYear W20171228502013 @default.
• W2017122850 countsByYear W20171228502015 @default.
• W2017122850 countsByYear W20171228502017 @default.
• W2017122850 countsByYear W20171228502023 @default.
• W2017122850 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5008003126 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5024478430 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5026961297 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5042041117 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5042509490 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5043320921 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5073927591 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5078987589 @default.
• W2017122850 hasAuthorship W2017122850A5086959830 @default.
• W2017122850 hasBestOaLocation W20171228502 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConcept C2778589496 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConcept C2778739407 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConceptScore W2017122850C141071460 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConceptScore W2017122850C14184104 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConceptScore W2017122850C168563851 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConceptScore W2017122850C2778451229 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConceptScore W2017122850C2778589496 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConceptScore W2017122850C2778739407 @default.
• W2017122850 hasConceptScore W2017122850C71924100 @default.
• W2017122850 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2017122850 hasLocation W20171228501 @default.
• W2017122850 hasLocation W20171228502 @default.
• W2017122850 hasLocation W20171228503 @default.
• W2017122850 hasOpenAccess W2017122850 @default.
• W2017122850 hasPrimaryLocation W20171228501 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W1971692434 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2071465818 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2347583830 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2351295325 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2352296468 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2393694421 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2017122850 hasRelatedWork W2760980560 @default.
• W2017122850 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2017122850 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2017122850 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2017122850 magId "2017122850" @default.
• W2017122850 workType "article" @default.