Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017234609> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2017234609 endingPage "1292" @default.
- W2017234609 startingPage "1282" @default.
- W2017234609 abstract "Objective. To compare Doppler ultrasound (US) and 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3.0-T MRI) findings of synovial inflammation in the tendons and joints in an early polyarthritis cohort (patients who presented < 1 year after arthritis onset) using a bilateral hand and wrist evaluation. Also, to evaluate the diagnostic performance of US and MRI findings for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), their ability to predict RA as a diagnostic outcome, and their capacity to improve the accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) RA classification criteria in early arthritis. Methods. Forty-five patients (40 women, 5 men; mean age 45.6 yrs) with untreated recent-onset polyarthritis participated in this prospective study and were examined using an US and MRI approach including both wrists and hands. After a followup of 12 months, patients were classified as having RA if they fulfilled the criteria for RA. The proportion of synovitis identified by US and MRI for each joint and tendon region was compared by chi-square test. The diagnostic performance of US and MRI for RA identification was evaluated using receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis. Possible associations between synovitis for each joint and tendon region as identified by US or MRI and RA diagnosis at 12 months were tested by logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of the ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria corrected by US and MRI joint and tendon counts was evaluated using ROC analysis. Results. Thirty patients fulfilled the ACR/EULAR criteria [early RA (ERA) patients] and the remaining 15 failed to meet these criteria (non-RA). Carpal joint synovitis and tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons was found in 86.7% and 86.7% of patients with ERA on MRI compared with 63.3% and 50% on US, respectively (p < 0.05). The global MRI and US counts revealed a good diagnostic performance for RA diagnosis of both techniques, although MRI was statistically significantly better [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.959 and AUC = 0.853, respectively; z statistic = 2.210, p < 0.05]. MRI identification of carpal joint synovitis (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.119–11.841), tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons (OR 5.09, 95% CI 1.620–16.051), and global joint and tendon count (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.249–6.139) were in the multivariate logistic regression model the most powerful predictors of progression toward RA. In the group of ERA patients with US joint and tendon counts ≤ 10, a statistically significant difference was found between the diagnostic performance for RA of the ACR/EULAR criteria as previously described and the diagnostic performance of the MRI-corrected ACR/EULAR criteria (AUC = 0.898 and AUC = 0.986, respectively; z statistic = 2.181, p < 0.05). Conclusion. 3.0-T MRI identified a higher prevalence of synovitis in comparison to US in an early polyarthritis cohort. Both techniques have good diagnostic performance for RA although MRI reveals a significantly higher diagnostic capability. Synovitis of carpal joints and of flexor tendons as identified by MRI were the most powerful predictors of progression toward RA. In patients with US joint and tendon counts ≤ 10, MRI can significantly improve the diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria." @default.
- W2017234609 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2017234609 creator A5017660063 @default.
- W2017234609 creator A5033186147 @default.
- W2017234609 creator A5043747371 @default.
- W2017234609 creator A5048248640 @default.
- W2017234609 creator A5062299635 @default.
- W2017234609 creator A5070592956 @default.
- W2017234609 creator A5089654597 @default.
- W2017234609 date "2013-06-01" @default.
- W2017234609 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2017234609 title "Bilateral Evaluation of the Hand and Wrist in Untreated Early Inflammatory Arthritis: A Comparative Study of Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging" @default.
- W2017234609 cites W1257538669 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W1970607874 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W1981073026 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W1991579003 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W1996565913 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2005429018 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2006187120 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2008302815 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2015963581 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2017365905 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2017957554 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2021810337 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2031054356 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2054343352 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2054756566 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2055206601 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2057786455 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2058865825 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2070394957 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2071054988 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2072599634 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2081652078 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2083599840 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2099011724 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2109968028 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2113060075 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2115005417 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2128952811 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2130984114 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2137293831 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2142244142 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2142655550 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2145813064 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2146160698 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2146672820 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2149287663 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2150201630 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2152032167 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2152348310 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2154352540 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2159639540 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2160196964 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2165814934 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2171505815 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W2332398894 @default.
- W2017234609 cites W4233655940 @default.
- W2017234609 doi "https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.120713" @default.
- W2017234609 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23729806" @default.
- W2017234609 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2017234609 type Work @default.
- W2017234609 sameAs 2017234609 @default.
- W2017234609 citedByCount "42" @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092013 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092014 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092016 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092017 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092018 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092019 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092020 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092021 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092022 @default.
- W2017234609 countsByYear W20172346092023 @default.
- W2017234609 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2017234609 hasAuthorship W2017234609A5017660063 @default.
- W2017234609 hasAuthorship W2017234609A5033186147 @default.
- W2017234609 hasAuthorship W2017234609A5043747371 @default.
- W2017234609 hasAuthorship W2017234609A5048248640 @default.
- W2017234609 hasAuthorship W2017234609A5062299635 @default.
- W2017234609 hasAuthorship W2017234609A5070592956 @default.
- W2017234609 hasAuthorship W2017234609A5089654597 @default.
- W2017234609 hasBestOaLocation W20172346091 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C198451711 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C2776821229 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C2777077863 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C2777489490 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C2777575956 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C2778917330 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C2779244835 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2017234609 hasConceptScore W2017234609C126322002 @default.