FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017264791> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017264791 endingPage "735" @default.
• W2017264791 startingPage "729" @default.
• W2017264791 abstract "Despite a significant literature on the impact of stress on performance in achievement settings, little is known about whether and how stress might matter for would-be negotiators. In two studies, we investigate how bargainers cognitively appraise a looming negotiation, whether its prospect is stressful and what the consequences are for performance. Individuals who appraised a prospective negotiation as a threat experienced more stress ahead of a negotiation, and reached lower quality deals compared to those who had appraised a challenge. Results from a follow-up experiment showed that would-be negotiators who had appraised a threat behaved more passively and were less likely to use tough tactics compared to those who appraised a challenge. Those who appraised a threat also had relatively inaccurate perceptions of their partners’ priorities and interests, which undermined their outcomes. The outcome advantage for those who appraised a challenge was limited to negotiations that contained integrative potential." @default.
• W2017264791 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017264791 creator A5020284532 @default.
• W2017264791 creator A5041832528 @default.
• W2017264791 creator A5077781095 @default.
• W2017264791 date "2010-09-01" @default.
• W2017264791 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2017264791 title "The prospect of negotiating: Stress, cognitive appraisal, and performance" @default.
• W2017264791 cites W1935060619 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W1965486589 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W1984507281 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W1985028662 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W1985880440 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W1991589738 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W1995031937 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2016195723 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2017725200 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2018144608 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2026329660 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2031254750 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2036723236 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2038702827 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2043585904 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2056147220 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2056451383 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2059693510 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2061509541 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2064372167 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2064799332 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2074705273 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2084354217 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2086829344 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2091413411 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2095534499 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2101501573 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2104057213 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2111737038 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2119267782 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2121998834 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2126185102 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2149915148 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W2159638114 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W4232420981 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W4247232386 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W4248217900 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W4249920979 @default.
• W2017264791 cites W4255866550 @default.
• W2017264791 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.007" @default.
• W2017264791 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2017264791 type Work @default.
• W2017264791 sameAs 2017264791 @default.
• W2017264791 citedByCount "73" @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912012 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912013 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912014 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912015 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912016 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912018 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912019 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912020 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912021 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912022 @default.
• W2017264791 countsByYear W20172647912023 @default.
• W2017264791 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017264791 hasAuthorship W2017264791A5020284532 @default.
• W2017264791 hasAuthorship W2017264791A5041832528 @default.
• W2017264791 hasAuthorship W2017264791A5077781095 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C21036866 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C2778119494 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C111472728 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C138885662 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C15744967 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C169760540 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C169900460 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C17744445 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C199539241 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C199776023 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C21036866 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C26760741 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C2778119494 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C2779530757 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C41895202 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C75630572 @default.
• W2017264791 hasConceptScore W2017264791C77805123 @default.
• W2017264791 hasIssue "5" @default.

• next