FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017308097> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017308097 endingPage "332" @default.
• W2017308097 startingPage "326" @default.
• W2017308097 abstract "Objective.—To examine the relationship between doctor-parent communication patterns and parents' perceptions that they were listened to by the doctor. Design.—Cross-sectional, clinic-based survey. Before the visit, parents were asked about the strength of their desires/preferences for being listened to; after the visit, they were asked if their desires were fulfilled and to rate their satisfaction with care. Encounters were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded for parent requests for information and action and physician responses to those requests. Coding was performed using an adapted version of the Taxonomy of Requests by Patients (TORP). Physician responses to parental requests for information were coded as brief, moderate, or prolonged fulfillment or as partially fulfilled, ignored, or denied. Setting.—Two private pediatric practices, 1 community based and 1 university based. Participants.—Ten of 13 eligible physicians (participation rate, 77%) and 306 of 356 eligible parents (participation rate, 86%) who sought care for their children's respiratory illnesses. Parents were invited to participate if they spoke and read English and if their child was 2–10 years old, had a chief complaint of cold symptoms, and was seeing one of the participating physicians. Complete data were obtained for 287 doctor-parent encounters (94%). Results.—Before the visit, 74% of parents reported that they considered it necessary for the physician to listen to their ideas about their child's illness. Among these parents, 62% (n = 130) reported after the visit that the physician had listened to their ideas. As the proportion of moderate-length responses to parent requests for information increased, parents were significantly more likely to report being listened to (P < .05). Multivariate results indicated a 59% probability of parents reporting that they were listened to when given moderate-length responses, 45% when given brief responses, 39% when given prolonged responses, and 12% when requests for information were only partially fulfilled, ignored, or denied. The length of response to parent requests for information was not related to overall parent satisfaction. Conclusions.—Parents who received moderate-length answers to their questions were most likely to report that they were listened to. Although it is assumed that lengthier, in-depth explanations result in higher satisfaction, this study suggests that more doctor talk does not necessarily constitute better communication." @default.
• W2017308097 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017308097 creator A5028510867 @default.
• W2017308097 creator A5029986159 @default.
• W2017308097 creator A5031871819 @default.
• W2017308097 creator A5037798211 @default.
• W2017308097 creator A5076299585 @default.
• W2017308097 date "2001-11-01" @default.
• W2017308097 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2017308097 title "How Much Explanation Is Enough? A Study of Parent Requests for Information and Physician Responses" @default.
• W2017308097 cites W137123442 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W1964355339 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W1965916106 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2005784204 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2044817627 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2045359722 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2052365398 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2053555954 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2073354763 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2075219085 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2075552398 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2084155907 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2088020509 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W2332217505 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W4232547525 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W4245899339 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W4293247586 @default.
• W2017308097 cites W4301903823 @default.
• W2017308097 doi "https://doi.org/10.1367/1539-4409(2001)001<0326:hmeiea>2.0.co;2" @default.
• W2017308097 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11888423" @default.
• W2017308097 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2017308097 type Work @default.
• W2017308097 sameAs 2017308097 @default.
• W2017308097 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2017308097 countsByYear W20173080972012 @default.
• W2017308097 countsByYear W20173080972013 @default.
• W2017308097 countsByYear W20173080972014 @default.
• W2017308097 countsByYear W20173080972015 @default.
• W2017308097 countsByYear W20173080972017 @default.
• W2017308097 countsByYear W20173080972020 @default.
• W2017308097 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017308097 hasAuthorship W2017308097A5028510867 @default.
• W2017308097 hasAuthorship W2017308097A5029986159 @default.
• W2017308097 hasAuthorship W2017308097A5031871819 @default.
• W2017308097 hasAuthorship W2017308097A5037798211 @default.
• W2017308097 hasAuthorship W2017308097A5076299585 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C179518139 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C2780838233 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C105795698 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C15744967 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C159110408 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C169760540 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C17744445 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C179518139 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C199539241 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C26760741 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C2775944032 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C2780838233 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C33923547 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C512399662 @default.
• W2017308097 hasConceptScore W2017308097C71924100 @default.
• W2017308097 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2017308097 hasLocation W20173080971 @default.
• W2017308097 hasLocation W20173080972 @default.
• W2017308097 hasOpenAccess W2017308097 @default.
• W2017308097 hasPrimaryLocation W20173080971 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W2011808192 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W2126856172 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W2367134191 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W2405062443 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W2407643697 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W2886214291 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W2908382879 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W3012519503 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W4386638810 @default.
• W2017308097 hasRelatedWork W174809926 @default.
• W2017308097 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W2017308097 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2017308097 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2017308097 magId "2017308097" @default.
• W2017308097 workType "article" @default.