FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017331102> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017331102 endingPage "e1000140" @default.
• W2017331102 startingPage "e1000140" @default.
• W2017331102 abstract "We conducted an Internet-based randomized trial comparing four graphical displays of the benefits of antibiotics for people with sore throat who must decide whether to go to the doctor to seek treatment. Our objective was to determine which display resulted in choices most consistent with participants' values.This was the first of a series of televised trials undertaken in cooperation with the Norwegian Broadcasting Company. We recruited adult volunteers in Norway through a nationally televised weekly health program. Participants went to our Web site and rated the relative importance of the consequences of treatment using visual analogue scales (VAS). They viewed the graphical display (or no information) to which they were randomized and were asked to decide whether to go to the doctor for an antibiotic prescription. We compared four presentations: face icons (happy/sad) or a bar graph showing the proportion of people with symptoms on day three with and without treatment, a bar graph of the average duration of symptoms, and a bar graph of proportion with symptoms on both days three and seven. Before completing the study, all participants were shown all the displays and detailed patient information about the treatment of sore throat and were asked to decide again. We calculated a relative importance score (RIS) by subtracting the VAS scores for the undesirable consequences of antibiotics from the VAS score for the benefit of symptom relief. We used logistic regression to determine the association between participants' RIS and their choice. 1,760 participants completed the study. There were statistically significant differences in the likelihood of choosing to go to the doctor in relation to different values (RIS). Of the four presentations, the bar graph of duration of symptoms resulted in decisions that were most consistent with the more fully informed second decision. Most participants also preferred this presentation (38%) and found it easiest to understand (37%). Participants shown the other three presentations were more likely to decide to go to the doctor based on their first decision than everyone based on the second decision. Participants preferred the graph using faces the least (14.4%).For decisions about going to the doctor to get antibiotics for sore throat, treatment effects presented by a bar graph showing the duration of symptoms helped people make decisions more consistent with their values than treatment effects presented as graphical displays of proportions of people with sore throat following treatment.ISRCTN58507086." @default.
• W2017331102 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5001943409 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5019157396 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5041615321 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5043722824 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5049123605 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5061691563 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5066748379 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5071469062 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5071868716 @default.
• W2017331102 creator A5082652200 @default.
• W2017331102 date "2009-08-25" @default.
• W2017331102 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2017331102 title "The Effect of Alternative Graphical Displays Used to Present the Benefits of Antibiotics for Sore Throat on Decisions about Whether to Seek Treatment: A Randomized Trial" @default.
• W2017331102 cites W1817162255 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W1956498302 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W1972038081 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W1992341016 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2013022164 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2035654337 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2065598197 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2069233558 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2081697999 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2093770528 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2108982337 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2115020535 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2119925402 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2122748157 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2130365212 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2139429185 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2141229480 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2146745032 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2151443489 @default.
• W2017331102 cites W2153877859 @default.
• W2017331102 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000140" @default.
• W2017331102 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2726763" @default.
• W2017331102 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19707579" @default.
• W2017331102 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2017331102 type Work @default.
• W2017331102 sameAs 2017331102 @default.
• W2017331102 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022012 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022013 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022014 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022016 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022017 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022018 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022020 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022021 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022022 @default.
• W2017331102 countsByYear W20173311022023 @default.
• W2017331102 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5001943409 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5019157396 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5041615321 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5043722824 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5049123605 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5061691563 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5066748379 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5071469062 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5071868716 @default.
• W2017331102 hasAuthorship W2017331102A5082652200 @default.
• W2017331102 hasBestOaLocation W20173311021 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C2426938 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C2776989088 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C2777870961 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C63428231 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C126322002 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C138885662 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C141071460 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C159110408 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C168563851 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C1862650 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C2426938 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C2776989088 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C2777870961 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C41895202 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C512399662 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C63428231 @default.
• W2017331102 hasConceptScore W2017331102C71924100 @default.
• W2017331102 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2017331102 hasLocation W20173311021 @default.
• W2017331102 hasLocation W20173311022 @default.
• W2017331102 hasLocation W20173311023 @default.
• W2017331102 hasLocation W20173311024 @default.
• W2017331102 hasLocation W20173311025 @default.
• W2017331102 hasOpenAccess W2017331102 @default.
• W2017331102 hasPrimaryLocation W20173311021 @default.

• next