Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017331363> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 80 of
80
with 100 items per page.
- W2017331363 endingPage "62" @default.
- W2017331363 startingPage "57" @default.
- W2017331363 abstract "Monteiro, Musten and Compson (2015) examined a number of critical issues in the ongoing debates concerning the nature of “mindfulness” and its applications within and beyond clinical psychology. Often appearing to take a neutral stance in relation to the debates between “traditional mindfulness” and “contemporarymindfulness,” their primary aimwas to “assess the validity” of criticisms concerning the conceptual integrity of contemporary mindfulness (p. 1). In particular, they evaluated the relationship of contemporary mindfulness to the Buddhist doctrines of “right mindfulness,” the degree to which “suffering” is alleviated in traditional and contemporary mindfulness, and whether Buddhist ethics should play a more explicit and pronounced role in mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs). The authors were careful throughout the article to suggest what could be done rather than what should be done in the ongoing dialogue between traditional and contemporary mindfulness. This commentary suggests that this stance leaves a number of implicit assumptions unexamined or underexamined. In particular, two key issues will be explored: (1) the assumption that Buddhist conceptions of suffering and psychological conceptions of suffering are compatible and serve as an adequate point of departure for the translation of mindfulness from traditional contexts to contemporary applications in psychology and (2) the consequences of importing Buddhist ethical and normative frameworks associated with “right mindfulness” into contemporary mindfulness. Establishing Common Ground Between Buddhism and Psychology: the Problem of “Suffering”" @default.
- W2017331363 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2017331363 creator A5051043875 @default.
- W2017331363 date "2014-12-28" @default.
- W2017331363 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2017331363 title "Why Right Mindfulness Might Not Be Right for Mindfulness" @default.
- W2017331363 cites W1677144028 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W1973538803 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W1981757454 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2001783912 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2006422820 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2027526537 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2038434183 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2038591124 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2042395177 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2051695070 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2055160457 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2061046649 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2072559409 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2084605964 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2086119312 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2155071281 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2156936654 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2168328834 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W2482451226 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W4236849796 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W4238359584 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W4240646199 @default.
- W2017331363 cites W4381892220 @default.
- W2017331363 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0380-5" @default.
- W2017331363 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2017331363 type Work @default.
- W2017331363 sameAs 2017331363 @default.
- W2017331363 citedByCount "41" @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632015 @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632016 @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632017 @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632018 @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632019 @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632020 @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632021 @default.
- W2017331363 countsByYear W20173313632022 @default.
- W2017331363 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2017331363 hasAuthorship W2017331363A5051043875 @default.
- W2017331363 hasBestOaLocation W20173313631 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConcept C2780444219 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConceptScore W2017331363C138816342 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConceptScore W2017331363C15744967 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConceptScore W2017331363C159110408 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConceptScore W2017331363C2780444219 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConceptScore W2017331363C542102704 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConceptScore W2017331363C70410870 @default.
- W2017331363 hasConceptScore W2017331363C71924100 @default.
- W2017331363 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2017331363 hasLocation W20173313631 @default.
- W2017331363 hasOpenAccess W2017331363 @default.
- W2017331363 hasPrimaryLocation W20173313631 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W1973410229 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W1986874329 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W2009463399 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W2034056632 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W2051252430 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W2057307643 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W3027146142 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W3111116358 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W3133552195 @default.
- W2017331363 hasRelatedWork W3157220756 @default.
- W2017331363 hasVolume "6" @default.
- W2017331363 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2017331363 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2017331363 magId "2017331363" @default.
- W2017331363 workType "article" @default.