FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017504071> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017504071 endingPage "1620" @default.
• W2017504071 startingPage "1614" @default.
• W2017504071 abstract "Purpose To evaluate whether there was a difference in complication rates in our patients treated with external fixation versus volar plating of distal radius fractures. We also looked for a difference in radiographic results; in the clinical outcomes of flexion, extension, supination, pronation, and grip strength; and in scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Methods We reviewed 115 patients with comminuted intrarticular distal radius fractures. Of those patients, 59 were treated with external fixation and 56 with volar plate fixation. Postoperative radiographs, range of motion, and grip strength were measured; DASH and VAS pain questionnaires were administered; and complications were documented. Results The external fixation group had a significantly higher overall complication rate. In the volar plate group, there were more tendon and median nerve complications, but this difference was not significant. Radiographically, the external fixator group demonstrated radial shortening of 0.7 mm, whereas the volar plate group demonstrated 0.3 mm of radial shortening during the postoperative period. There were no significant differences between the groups in the measurement of scapholunate angle or palmar tilt. The mean DASH score at final follow-up was 32 in the external fixation group and 17 in the volar plate group, which was statistically significant. The final VAS scores were statistically different at 3.1 for the external fixation group and 1.1 for the volar plate group. On physical examination, the volar plate group had significantly better arc of motion in pronation–supination and flexion–extension and better grip strength. Conclusions In the patients we studied, volar plate fixation has an overall decreased incidence of complications and significantly better motion in flexion–extension and supination–pronation compared to external fixation. Volar plate fixation also has less radial shortening than the external fixation group, yet the absolute difference in magnitude of ulnar variance was only 1.4 mm, calling into question the clinical significance of this difference. Patients with volar plating also have better pain and functional outcomes and better grip strength. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic III. To evaluate whether there was a difference in complication rates in our patients treated with external fixation versus volar plating of distal radius fractures. We also looked for a difference in radiographic results; in the clinical outcomes of flexion, extension, supination, pronation, and grip strength; and in scores on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. We reviewed 115 patients with comminuted intrarticular distal radius fractures. Of those patients, 59 were treated with external fixation and 56 with volar plate fixation. Postoperative radiographs, range of motion, and grip strength were measured; DASH and VAS pain questionnaires were administered; and complications were documented. The external fixation group had a significantly higher overall complication rate. In the volar plate group, there were more tendon and median nerve complications, but this difference was not significant. Radiographically, the external fixator group demonstrated radial shortening of 0.7 mm, whereas the volar plate group demonstrated 0.3 mm of radial shortening during the postoperative period. There were no significant differences between the groups in the measurement of scapholunate angle or palmar tilt. The mean DASH score at final follow-up was 32 in the external fixation group and 17 in the volar plate group, which was statistically significant. The final VAS scores were statistically different at 3.1 for the external fixation group and 1.1 for the volar plate group. On physical examination, the volar plate group had significantly better arc of motion in pronation–supination and flexion–extension and better grip strength. In the patients we studied, volar plate fixation has an overall decreased incidence of complications and significantly better motion in flexion–extension and supination–pronation compared to external fixation. Volar plate fixation also has less radial shortening than the external fixation group, yet the absolute difference in magnitude of ulnar variance was only 1.4 mm, calling into question the clinical significance of this difference. Patients with volar plating also have better pain and functional outcomes and better grip strength." @default.
• W2017504071 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017504071 creator A5013444723 @default.
• W2017504071 creator A5032921696 @default.
• W2017504071 creator A5041229626 @default.
• W2017504071 creator A5048158101 @default.
• W2017504071 creator A5079695190 @default.
• W2017504071 creator A5089355659 @default.
• W2017504071 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W2017504071 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2017504071 title "Analysis of the Complications of Palmar Plating Versus External Fixation for Fractures of the Distal Radius" @default.
• W2017504071 cites W1618335299 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W1964505178 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W1971249629 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W1983541677 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W1986401603 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W1992432188 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2015967097 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2024329022 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2025303275 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2037579883 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2042952974 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2049709149 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2060367990 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2065993617 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2071267888 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2076420073 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2076602472 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2079883809 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2089894191 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2092049533 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2094185296 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2099246185 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2117952149 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2119203482 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2125124516 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2125805655 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2126345870 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2133715354 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2137261004 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2140111687 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2148017074 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2151757685 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2186875716 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2188945701 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2253449895 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2279376296 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2284511801 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2398976783 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2417872905 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W2742416965 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W4242017804 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W4253595793 @default.
• W2017504071 cites W4289929767 @default.
• W2017504071 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.06.030" @default.
• W2017504071 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21849236" @default.
• W2017504071 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2017504071 type Work @default.
• W2017504071 sameAs 2017504071 @default.
• W2017504071 citedByCount "65" @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712012 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712013 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712014 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712015 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712016 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712017 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712018 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712019 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712020 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712021 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712022 @default.
• W2017504071 countsByYear W20175040712023 @default.
• W2017504071 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017504071 hasAuthorship W2017504071A5013444723 @default.
• W2017504071 hasAuthorship W2017504071A5032921696 @default.
• W2017504071 hasAuthorship W2017504071A5041229626 @default.
• W2017504071 hasAuthorship W2017504071A5048158101 @default.
• W2017504071 hasAuthorship W2017504071A5079695190 @default.
• W2017504071 hasAuthorship W2017504071A5089355659 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C2776090536 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C2776813713 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C2777433710 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C2992047133 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConceptScore W2017504071C111919701 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConceptScore W2017504071C141071460 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConceptScore W2017504071C14184104 @default.
• W2017504071 hasConceptScore W2017504071C146249460 @default.

• next