FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017566429> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017566429 endingPage "e86654" @default.
• W2017566429 startingPage "e86654" @default.
• W2017566429 abstract "Background The recent decline in fertility in India has been unprecedented especially in southern India, where fertility is almost exclusively controlled by means of permanent contraceptive methods, mainly female sterilization, which constitutes about two-thirds of overall contraceptive use. Many Indian women undergo sterilization at relatively young ages as a consequence of early marriage and childbearing in short birth intervals. This research aims to investigate the socioeconomic factors determining the choices for alternative contraceptive choices against the dominant preference for sterilization among married women in India. Methods Data for this study are drawn from the 2005–06 National Family Health Surveys focusing on a sample of married women who reported having used a method of contraception in the five years preceding the survey. A multilevel multinomial logit regression is used to estimate the impact of socioeconomic factors on contraceptive choices, differentiating temporary modern or traditional methods versus sterilization. Findings Religious affiliation, women's education and occupation had overarching influence on method choices amongst recent users. Muslim women were at higher odds of choosing a traditional or modern temporary method than sterilization. Higher level of women's education increased the odds of modern temporary method choices but the education effect on traditional method choices was only marginally significant. Recent users belonging to wealthier households had higher odds of choosing modern methods over sterilization. Exposure to family planning messages through radio had a positive effect on modern and traditional method choices. Community variations in method choices were highly significant. Conclusion The persistent dominance of sterilization in the Indian family planning programme is largely determined by socioeconomic conditions. Reproductive health programmes should address the socioeconomic barriers and consider multiple cost-effective strategies such as mass media to promote awareness of modern temporary methods." @default.
• W2017566429 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017566429 creator A5027662202 @default.
• W2017566429 creator A5062914195 @default.
• W2017566429 creator A5071874228 @default.
• W2017566429 date "2014-01-28" @default.
• W2017566429 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2017566429 title "Dominance of Sterilization and Alternative Choices of Contraception in India: An Appraisal of the Socioeconomic Impact" @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1567099747 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1678600457 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1902123914 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1963703166 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1972356256 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1980858448 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1984800918 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W1986597106 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2025622239 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2028358332 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2073602323 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2074655452 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2079524940 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2081239273 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2082712520 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2120956367 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2139500414 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2167340672 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W2181932146 @default.
• W2017566429 cites W4229735851 @default.
• W2017566429 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086654" @default.
• W2017566429 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3904921" @default.
• W2017566429 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24489759" @default.
• W2017566429 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2017566429 type Work @default.
• W2017566429 sameAs 2017566429 @default.
• W2017566429 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292014 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292015 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292016 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292017 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292018 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292019 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292020 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292021 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292022 @default.
• W2017566429 countsByYear W20175664292023 @default.
• W2017566429 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017566429 hasAuthorship W2017566429A5027662202 @default.
• W2017566429 hasAuthorship W2017566429A5062914195 @default.
• W2017566429 hasAuthorship W2017566429A5071874228 @default.
• W2017566429 hasBestOaLocation W20175664291 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C147077947 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C148761745 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C2776983459 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C2779076696 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C2779379456 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C2983132609 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C2986817661 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C3013748606 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C518429986 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C536366893 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C556758197 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConcept C83864248 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C126322002 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C143095724 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C144024400 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C147077947 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C148761745 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C149923435 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C151956035 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C162324750 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C2776983459 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C2779076696 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C2779379456 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C2908647359 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C2983132609 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C2986817661 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C3013748606 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C45355965 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C50522688 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C512399662 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C518429986 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C536366893 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C556758197 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C71924100 @default.
• W2017566429 hasConceptScore W2017566429C83864248 @default.
• W2017566429 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2017566429 hasLocation W20175664291 @default.

• next