FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017603114> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017603114 endingPage "537" @default.
• W2017603114 startingPage "537" @default.
• W2017603114 abstract "Endothelial cell counts after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes Marcus Ang1,2, Jodhbir S Mehta1–4, Arundhati Anshu1,2, Hon Kiat Wong5, Hla M Htoon2, Donald Tan1–31Singapore National Eye Centre, 2Singapore Eye Research Institute, 3Department of Ophthalmology, National University Health Systems, 4Department of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, 5Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, SingaporeBackground: The purpose of this study was to compare endothelial cell counts after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes.Methods: This was a retrospective study of patients from our prospective Singapore Corneal Transplant Study cohort who received corneal transplantation in 2006–2008. We compared eyes that underwent DSAEK or penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy or pseudophakic and aphakic bullous keratopathy. Clinical data, and donor and recipient characteristics were recorded. Of 241 patients who met our inclusion criteria, 68 underwent DSAEK and 173 underwent penetrating keratoplasty. The main outcome measure was endothelial cell loss at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures were graft survival and visual outcomes at 1-year follow-up.Results: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics of patients between the treatment groups. Percent endothelial cell loss at 1-year follow-up was greater in penetrating keratoplasty eyes (40.9% ± 2.9%) compared with DSAEK eyes (22.4% ± 2.3%; P < 0.001). DSAEK-treated eyes had significantly superior uncorrected visual acuity (mean difference = 0.42 ± 0.0059; P < 0.001) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (mean difference = 0.14 ± 0.032; P < 0.001) as compared with penetrating keratoplasty-treated eyes. Penetrating keratoplasty-treated eyes had worse astigmatism as compared with DSAEK-treated eyes (-3.0 ± 2.1 versus -1.7 ± 0.8; P < 0.001). Graft survival at 1 year was comparable in both groups, ie, 66/68 (97.0%) DSAEK-treated eyes versus 158/173 (92.0%) of penetrating keratoplasty-treated eyes had clear grafts (P = 0.479).Conclusion: We report lower percent endothelial cell loss comparing DSAEK and penetrating keratoplasty at 1-year follow-up in Asian eyes, with comparable graft survival rates in both groups.Keywords: Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, endothelial cell count, penetrating keratoplasty" @default.
• W2017603114 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017603114 creator A5007639938 @default.
• W2017603114 creator A5012244883 @default.
• W2017603114 creator A5026163161 @default.
• W2017603114 creator A5050145910 @default.
• W2017603114 creator A5052555595 @default.
• W2017603114 creator A5058323483 @default.
• W2017603114 date "2012-04-01" @default.
• W2017603114 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2017603114 title "Endothelial cell counts after Descemet&rsquo;s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes" @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1485620304 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1574155093 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1685196517 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W184641614 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1964088771 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1976839074 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1978150726 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1982594013 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W1992105705 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2013309362 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2014230980 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2016362669 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2022352896 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2028813683 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2039995027 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2048154882 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2068341897 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2071252414 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2079290932 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2082735036 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2098141260 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2129958042 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2137761091 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W2149400711 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W52053813 @default.
• W2017603114 cites W62354223 @default.
• W2017603114 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/opth.s26343" @default.
• W2017603114 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3334224" @default.
• W2017603114 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536049" @default.
• W2017603114 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2017603114 type Work @default.
• W2017603114 sameAs 2017603114 @default.
• W2017603114 citedByCount "30" @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142013 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142015 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142016 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142017 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142018 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142020 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142021 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142022 @default.
• W2017603114 countsByYear W20176031142023 @default.
• W2017603114 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017603114 hasAuthorship W2017603114A5007639938 @default.
• W2017603114 hasAuthorship W2017603114A5012244883 @default.
• W2017603114 hasAuthorship W2017603114A5026163161 @default.
• W2017603114 hasAuthorship W2017603114A5050145910 @default.
• W2017603114 hasAuthorship W2017603114A5052555595 @default.
• W2017603114 hasAuthorship W2017603114A5058323483 @default.
• W2017603114 hasBestOaLocation W20176031141 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConcept C2776882836 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConcept C3019694093 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConceptScore W2017603114C118487528 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConceptScore W2017603114C2776882836 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConceptScore W2017603114C2778257484 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConceptScore W2017603114C3019694093 @default.
• W2017603114 hasConceptScore W2017603114C71924100 @default.
• W2017603114 hasLocation W20176031141 @default.
• W2017603114 hasLocation W20176031142 @default.
• W2017603114 hasLocation W20176031143 @default.
• W2017603114 hasLocation W20176031144 @default.
• W2017603114 hasLocation W20176031145 @default.
• W2017603114 hasOpenAccess W2017603114 @default.
• W2017603114 hasPrimaryLocation W20176031141 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W1500014813 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W2349999257 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W2354275354 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W2360405837 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W2362959154 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W2375014553 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W2943748138 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W3144440816 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W4230689023 @default.
• W2017603114 hasRelatedWork W202679667 @default.
• W2017603114 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2017603114 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2017603114 magId "2017603114" @default.
• W2017603114 workType "article" @default.