FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017617308> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017617308 endingPage "78" @default.
• W2017617308 startingPage "64" @default.
• W2017617308 abstract "Abstract This article examines how returning to the question of interpretation in twentieth-century psychoanalysis can help us readdress the discipline's bearing on literary studies, in particular the study of poetry. Reading the work of Sandor Ferenczi and D.W. Winnicott, the article sets out their responses to well-documented controversies surrounding psychoanalytic interpretation. Using original research on the correspondence of both analysts and key references to poetry and 'the poetic' in their writing, I examine how their theories of interpretation rely on notions not only of language but of poetry, and how this reliance prompts us to consider the implications of their conclusions for the project of critical reading. These analysts' understanding of aesthetic as well as psychoanalytic relationship stretches our sense of what interpretation is for and what impulses might be behind it. The status of poetry in their work invites us to bring this discussion back into the field of literature.Keywords Psychoanalysis, Interpretation, Literary Criticism, Poetics, Poetry, Sandor Ferenczi, D.W. Winnicott.At the end of Freud and. Philosophy, Paul Ricoeur probes psychoanalysis with this pointed question: 'does not this discipline of the real, this ascesis of the necessary, lack the grace of imagination, the upsurge of the possible?'1 To whom or what the principles of imagination and possibility are being ascribed, and how they might be lacking in psychoanalysis, are queries Ricoeur leaves ajar here. Just how can the 'grace of imagination' be at stake in a discipline that, like the study of literature, champions the creative work of the mind?Psychoanalysis, 'this discipline of the real', has long try sted with literature, discipline of imagination par excellence. The legacy of psychoanalysis in literary theory is a complex one, with critics and advocates perhaps in equal measure.2 Yet among psychoanalytic readings of texts, critiques of psychoanalysis by analysts themselves are largely absent, critiques that, in this reading, force quite a different set of questions out of the encounter between psychoanalysis and the work of literature, and invite new forms of critical reading. In this essay I examine the work of two twentieth-century analysts whose critiques of psychoanalytic interpretation encourage a rereading of what psychoanalysis can offer the interpretation of language beyond the psychoanalytic discourse - principally, but not solely, the literary text. For Hungarian analyst Sandor Ferenczi and British child psychoanalyst D. W. Winnicott, interpretation, that staple of psychoanalysis, presents an abiding problem for the discipline: their thinking holds a question mark over the politics of language in interpretation, over what precisely an analyst does when he 'reads' a patient.The theoretical leap from psychoanalytic to literary interpretation is often made on the impulse of analogy - between the forms of the Traumarbeit, and the linguistic resources of poetry, for example, taking its cue from Freud's elaborate comparison between literary and psychic symbolism.3 Here I will be making the leap on the basis of an experience of language both Ferenczi and Winnicott call 'poetry', a reference that not only raises the question of literature and specifically poetic form but invites a striking way of thinking about interpretation in critical culture, beyond clinical psychoanalysis and beyond poetics. 'Poetry' in their work invokes a potential in language that, for both analysts, begs to be heeded by interpretations that otherwise acquiesce in a form of subjective idealism: a discourse of the other, 'poetry' refers to language as it resists an interpretation. It is out of a valorisation of this resistance that their critique of interpretations that privilege non-resistance arises, along with a query as to what interpretation excludes to the advantage of its own logic, even its own poetics.Such resistance poses a challenge to the self-centred subject of interpretation who, while the subject of parole finds his own speech debunked by the revolutionary Freudian insight of the unconscious, has escaped the psychoanalytic critique of the subject largely unscathed, his sovereignty over the interpreted language remaining more or less intact. …" @default.
• W2017617308 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017617308 creator A5039329372 @default.
• W2017617308 date "2014-12-20" @default.
• W2017617308 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2017617308 title "Psychoanalysis and the Poem: On Reading in Sándor Ferenczi and D. W. Winnicott" @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1490126028 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1500952994 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1505766112 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1520589609 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1527968558 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1533149259 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1549343194 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1559064791 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1570704017 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1571191814 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1574632869 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1585527849 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1592589130 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1600774362 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1602489485 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1614549126 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1698773174 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W172814568 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W1777333842 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2016977510 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2033782002 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2098224758 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2333492275 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2798823261 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2891620858 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2896166644 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2950373482 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W2999074471 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W3016007247 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W3023922815 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W588196921 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W595211645 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W612321449 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W617598287 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W635933728 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W636601751 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W640052695 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W645358976 @default.
• W2017617308 cites W651713349 @default.
• W2017617308 doi "https://doi.org/10.3898/newf.83.04.2014" @default.
• W2017617308 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2017617308 type Work @default.
• W2017617308 sameAs 2017617308 @default.
• W2017617308 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2017617308 countsByYear W20176173082019 @default.
• W2017617308 countsByYear W20176173082022 @default.
• W2017617308 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017617308 hasAuthorship W2017617308A5039329372 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C11171543 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C124952713 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C138885662 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C142362112 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C15744967 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C164913051 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C41895202 @default.
• W2017617308 hasConceptScore W2017617308C554936623 @default.
• W2017617308 hasIssue "83" @default.
• W2017617308 hasLocation W20176173081 @default.
• W2017617308 hasOpenAccess W2017617308 @default.
• W2017617308 hasPrimaryLocation W20176173081 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W1531601525 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W2758277628 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W2935909890 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W2948807893 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W3173606202 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W3183948672 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W2778153218 @default.
• W2017617308 hasRelatedWork W3110381201 @default.
• W2017617308 hasVolume "83" @default.
• W2017617308 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2017617308 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2017617308 magId "2017617308" @default.
• W2017617308 workType "article" @default.