FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017677002> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2017677002 endingPage "9887" @default.
• W2017677002 startingPage "9873" @default.
• W2017677002 abstract "The sensitivity of the total ozone distribution in our two‐dimensional photochemical model to dynamical inputs has been explored. The residual circulation has been computed from three sets of heating rates but using the same temperature distributions. These heating rates result in advection fields that are appropriately linked with the magnitude of their vertical winds in the lower stratosphere and are called: (1) the strong circulation, (2) the weak circulation, and (3) the combined circulation. Three different formulations of horizontal eddy diffusion have also been investigated, including (1) a small constant diffusion, (2) a computed diffusion from potential vorticity using measured temperatures, and (3) a self‐consistent diffusion determined from the meridional velocity. Finally, we studied two different formulations of vertical eddy diffusion: (1) a small constant diffusion and (2) an altitude‐dependent larger diffusion. Our modeled global average total ozone varies by up to 10%, depending on the various dynamical inputs, and the seasonal and latitudinal variabilities are even more substantial. The calculations indicate that total ozone in the middle to high latitudes is very sensitive to the advection field below 100 mbar, the region where the heating rates (which are used in computing the advection field) are most uncertain. Modeled total ozone shows better agreement with solar backscattered ultraviolet (SBUV) ozone climatology, when computed horizontal eddy diffusion is used. Our “best” modeled total ozone distribution is a result of using the heating rates from Rosenfield et al. (1987) for pressures less than 100 mbar, along with heating rates from Dopplick (1974, 1979) for pressures greater than 100 mbar. Our model results, especially when comparing model and SBUV ozone between 10 and 1 mbar, indicate that there is an inconsistency between our “best” horizontal eddy diffusion and the “best” mean residual circulation. Our studies indicate a relative similarity of a typical ozone perturbation scenario among the different dynamical inputs. All of the perturbation studies predict the smallest ozone changes in the tropical latitudes, with larger ozone changes in the middle to high latitudes. The major changes in the various perturbation results are in the middle to high latitudes: (1) the peak ozone change is off of the pole in the southern hemisphere (near 60°S latitude) using the strong circulation but centered on the pole for the various other dynamical studies, and (2) the maximum ozone change is centered at times varying from early spring to early summer, depending on which dynamical input is used." @default.
• W2017677002 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2017677002 creator A5014236280 @default.
• W2017677002 creator A5028973159 @default.
• W2017677002 creator A5058946159 @default.
• W2017677002 creator A5072012234 @default.
• W2017677002 date "1989-07-20" @default.
• W2017677002 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2017677002 title "The sensitivity of total ozone and ozone perturbation scenarios in a two‐dimensional model due to dynamical inputs" @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1620886755 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1655849092 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1975011958 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1977350232 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1985338362 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1988171870 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1991172627 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1995404763 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W1999801780 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2005870127 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2015618635 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2024976312 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2027072908 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2041258251 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2054073304 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2066342707 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2066996246 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2067891842 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2077881537 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2084765781 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2099639182 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2112761115 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2141319951 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2145031260 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2150171994 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2153853652 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2156052559 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2167449679 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2237285145 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W2605783701 @default.
• W2017677002 cites W4236293517 @default.
• W2017677002 doi "https://doi.org/10.1029/jd094id07p09873" @default.
• W2017677002 hasPublicationYear "1989" @default.
• W2017677002 type Work @default.
• W2017677002 sameAs 2017677002 @default.
• W2017677002 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2017677002 countsByYear W20176770022022 @default.
• W2017677002 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2017677002 hasAuthorship W2017677002A5014236280 @default.
• W2017677002 hasAuthorship W2017677002A5028973159 @default.
• W2017677002 hasAuthorship W2017677002A5058946159 @default.
• W2017677002 hasAuthorship W2017677002A5072012234 @default.
• W2017677002 hasBestOaLocation W20176770022 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C104196234 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C109663097 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C115852967 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C163861444 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C196558001 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C5072599 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C508106653 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C69357855 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C91586092 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C104196234 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C109663097 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C115852967 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C121332964 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C153294291 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C163861444 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C196558001 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C39432304 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C5072599 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C508106653 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C69357855 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C91586092 @default.
• W2017677002 hasConceptScore W2017677002C97355855 @default.
• W2017677002 hasIssue "D7" @default.
• W2017677002 hasLocation W20176770021 @default.
• W2017677002 hasLocation W20176770022 @default.
• W2017677002 hasOpenAccess W2017677002 @default.
• W2017677002 hasPrimaryLocation W20176770021 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W1966151785 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W1970371644 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W1973152079 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W1981787060 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W1990749880 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W1994868953 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W2088603907 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W2091737106 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W2365562397 @default.
• W2017677002 hasRelatedWork W3021101847 @default.
• W2017677002 hasVolume "94" @default.
• W2017677002 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2017677002 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2017677002 magId "2017677002" @default.
• W2017677002 workType "article" @default.