Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2017756892> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W2017756892 endingPage "130" @default.
- W2017756892 startingPage "106" @default.
- W2017756892 abstract "This article argues that the recent case Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay) (Pulp Mills case) at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) between Argentina and Uruguay refreshes and incorporates new ideas that are important for the development of international environmental law.1 Past ICJ decisions have been considered an important source of international environmental law and by studying new environmental cases at the ICJ we can expect the further development of international environmental law. The judgment of the Pulp Mills case declared the status of, and tried to clarify, the content of environmental impact assessment and sustainable development as international law norms. Some new challenges involving environmental soft law, the application of sustainable development in court, and the burden of proof in the transboundary context also emerged in the court’s decision. In 2002 and 2005, Uruguay twice approved the construction of the Orion and the CMB pulp mills in the Uruguay territory on the Uruguay River (the boundary river between Argentina and Uruguay) and granted the environmental permits necessary for construction. This action by Uruguay provoked strong reaction from the Argentine government as well as from inhabitants living across the river. Having concerns about the anticipated environmental damage, the Argentinean residents near the pulp mills protested and blocked the General San Martín Bridge over the river for months, and the Argentine government expressed their serious concerns to the Uruguayan government regarding the environmental implications of the pulp mills. In response, the two countries established a High Level Technical Group, in the hope of reaching a negotiated agreement based on the 1975 bilateral Statute of the Uruguay River (1975 Statute), which was signed in 1975.2 However, Uruguay’s approval of the construction of the pulp mills and a port dock in Fray Bentos aborted the negotiation. In 2006, Argentina brought a complaint before the ICJ seeking international judicial relief." @default.
- W2017756892 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2017756892 creator A5022145286 @default.
- W2017756892 creator A5073466179 @default.
- W2017756892 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W2017756892 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2017756892 title "International Court of Justice’s Impact on International Environmental Law: Focusing on the Pulp Mills Case" @default.
- W2017756892 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/yiel/yvt066" @default.
- W2017756892 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W2017756892 type Work @default.
- W2017756892 sameAs 2017756892 @default.
- W2017756892 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W2017756892 countsByYear W20177568922022 @default.
- W2017756892 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2017756892 hasAuthorship W2017756892A5022145286 @default.
- W2017756892 hasAuthorship W2017756892A5073466179 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C128069549 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C164749845 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C185436325 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C188442228 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C2779871314 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C526734887 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C552854447 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C128069549 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C138885662 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C142724271 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C164749845 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C17744445 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C185436325 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C188442228 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C199539241 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C205649164 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C2778137410 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C2779871314 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C41895202 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C526734887 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C552854447 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C55447825 @default.
- W2017756892 hasConceptScore W2017756892C71924100 @default.
- W2017756892 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2017756892 hasLocation W20177568921 @default.
- W2017756892 hasOpenAccess W2017756892 @default.
- W2017756892 hasPrimaryLocation W20177568921 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W142235165 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W1485816698 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W1543078177 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W155659131 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W2004663209 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W2089076596 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W2116431771 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W2304733616 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W2891349902 @default.
- W2017756892 hasRelatedWork W4313461742 @default.
- W2017756892 hasVolume "23" @default.
- W2017756892 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2017756892 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2017756892 magId "2017756892" @default.
- W2017756892 workType "article" @default.