FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018011734> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2018011734 endingPage "298" @default.
• W2018011734 startingPage "298" @default.
• W2018011734 abstract "In your Nov 8 Editorial (Nov 8, p 1607),1The LancetCan health equity become a reality?.Lancet. 2008; 372: 1607Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar you endorse the recommendations of WHO's Commission on Social Determinants of Health, thereby adding to the consensus that the report is a vital contribution to future health policy.A respected peer-reviewed journal such as The Lancet should have been less hasty in giving its uncritical support to the WHO report, because it reinforces the misleading impression that it is an objective, academically rigorous examination of the relation between economic and social structures and health. It is not.Although the report must be applauded for the wide range of topics it addresses, it presumes its conclusions and is highly selective with its evidence, giving it a lot in common with political propaganda.There are a host of peer-reviewed studies in eminent journals that come to opposite conclusions about the usefulness of many of the Commission's proposals for domestic reform, including instituting minimum wage laws, beefing up welfare transfers, and tightening employment regulation.2Heckman J Pagés-Serra C The cost of job security regulation: evidence from Latin American labor markets.Economia. 2000; 1: 109-144Google Scholar, 3Daniel K Siebert W Does employment protection reduce the demand for unskilled labour?.Int Econ J. 2005; 15: 197-222Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar Excessive government intervention in these areas has been shown to entrench unemployment and perpetuate poverty. How can that be good for health?In the international sphere, the authors of the report have dwelled exclusively on the negatives of economic globalisation, implying that the myriad studies3Daniel K Siebert W Does employment protection reduce the demand for unskilled labour?.Int Econ J. 2005; 15: 197-222Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar, 4Pritchett L Summers L Wealthier is healthier.J Human Resources. 1996; 31: 841-868Crossref Scopus (665) Google Scholar showing a positive link between economic growth, free trade, human development, and health are not even worth a mention.The failure to provide balance suggests a fundamental bias that cannot be excused in a report released under the auspices of a supposedly impartial body such as WHO.I declare that I have no conflict of interest. In your Nov 8 Editorial (Nov 8, p 1607),1The LancetCan health equity become a reality?.Lancet. 2008; 372: 1607Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar you endorse the recommendations of WHO's Commission on Social Determinants of Health, thereby adding to the consensus that the report is a vital contribution to future health policy. A respected peer-reviewed journal such as The Lancet should have been less hasty in giving its uncritical support to the WHO report, because it reinforces the misleading impression that it is an objective, academically rigorous examination of the relation between economic and social structures and health. It is not. Although the report must be applauded for the wide range of topics it addresses, it presumes its conclusions and is highly selective with its evidence, giving it a lot in common with political propaganda. There are a host of peer-reviewed studies in eminent journals that come to opposite conclusions about the usefulness of many of the Commission's proposals for domestic reform, including instituting minimum wage laws, beefing up welfare transfers, and tightening employment regulation.2Heckman J Pagés-Serra C The cost of job security regulation: evidence from Latin American labor markets.Economia. 2000; 1: 109-144Google Scholar, 3Daniel K Siebert W Does employment protection reduce the demand for unskilled labour?.Int Econ J. 2005; 15: 197-222Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar Excessive government intervention in these areas has been shown to entrench unemployment and perpetuate poverty. How can that be good for health? In the international sphere, the authors of the report have dwelled exclusively on the negatives of economic globalisation, implying that the myriad studies3Daniel K Siebert W Does employment protection reduce the demand for unskilled labour?.Int Econ J. 2005; 15: 197-222Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar, 4Pritchett L Summers L Wealthier is healthier.J Human Resources. 1996; 31: 841-868Crossref Scopus (665) Google Scholar showing a positive link between economic growth, free trade, human development, and health are not even worth a mention. The failure to provide balance suggests a fundamental bias that cannot be excused in a report released under the auspices of a supposedly impartial body such as WHO. I declare that I have no conflict of interest." @default.
• W2018011734 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2018011734 creator A5057561588 @default.
• W2018011734 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2018011734 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2018011734 title "Bias in WHO report on the social determinants of health" @default.
• W2018011734 cites W1487459611 @default.
• W2018011734 cites W2169374600 @default.
• W2018011734 cites W2803072236 @default.
• W2018011734 cites W2892186579 @default.
• W2018011734 cites W3122863628 @default.
• W2018011734 cites W3123176205 @default.
• W2018011734 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60091-x" @default.
• W2018011734 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19167567" @default.
• W2018011734 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2018011734 type Work @default.
• W2018011734 sameAs 2018011734 @default.
• W2018011734 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2018011734 countsByYear W20180117342012 @default.
• W2018011734 countsByYear W20180117342013 @default.
• W2018011734 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2018011734 hasAuthorship W2018011734A5057561588 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C172886114 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C189326681 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C199728807 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C2778126366 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C2778716609 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C78491826 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C138885662 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C144024400 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C160735492 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C162324750 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C172886114 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C17744445 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C189326681 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C199539241 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C199728807 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C2776034101 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C2778126366 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C2778137410 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C2778716609 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C2779473830 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C41895202 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C50522688 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C78491826 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C83867959 @default.
• W2018011734 hasConceptScore W2018011734C94625758 @default.
• W2018011734 hasIssue "9660" @default.
• W2018011734 hasLocation W20180117341 @default.
• W2018011734 hasLocation W20180117342 @default.
• W2018011734 hasOpenAccess W2018011734 @default.
• W2018011734 hasPrimaryLocation W20180117341 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W1492271457 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W2052814989 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W2064443361 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W2104989867 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W2126856067 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W2133519815 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W2565753273 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W2790240656 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W4313353814 @default.
• W2018011734 hasRelatedWork W4320167349 @default.
• W2018011734 hasVolume "373" @default.
• W2018011734 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2018011734 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2018011734 magId "2018011734" @default.
• W2018011734 workType "article" @default.