FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018183995> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2018183995 endingPage "80" @default.
• W2018183995 startingPage "71" @default.
• W2018183995 abstract "Background: Hip resurfacing is a technically demanding procedure in which accurate positioning of the femoral component is critical to the avoidance of early implant failures. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted placement of the femoral component and to evaluate the impact of computer-assisted surgery on the learning curve associated with this procedure. Methods: The accuracy of positioning the femoral component was analyzed radiographically in hips undergoing resurfacing procedures performed by surgeons assigned to four different study groups: Group 1, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a fellowship-trained surgeon who was experienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty (surgical experience, more than 250 hip resurfacings); Group 2, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by senior residents who were inexperienced in performing resurfacing arthroplasty and who were closely supervised by faculty; Group 3, in which the operations were performed with use of conventional instruments by fellowship-trained faculty members; and Group 4, in which the operations were performed with use of computer-assisted surgery by a lesser experienced fellowship-trained faculty member (surgical experience, more than forty but less than seventy-five hip resurfacings) from Group 3. Results: The range of error in varus or valgus angulation that was observed for navigated procedures was 6° in Group 1, 7° in Group 2, and 5° in Group 4. Compared with the preoperative neck-shaft angle value, the mean postoperative stem-shaft angle value increased by a mean of 4.7° in Group 1, 7.2° in Group 2, 6.5° in Group 3, and 11.6° in Group 4. When compared with the use of standard instrumentation, the use of computer-assisted surgery reduced the number of outliers and facilitated valgus insertion. Conclusions: In the present study, computer-assisted surgery resulted in improved accuracy and precision in positioning the femoral component. In addition, computer-assisted surgery led to a reduction in the length of the learning curve for beginners in hip resurfacing and improved the surgeon's ability to perform this procedure safely. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence." @default.
• W2018183995 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2018183995 creator A5002780074 @default.
• W2018183995 creator A5058468684 @default.
• W2018183995 creator A5070624875 @default.
• W2018183995 creator A5079613318 @default.
• W2018183995 creator A5080093429 @default.
• W2018183995 date "2008-08-01" @default.
• W2018183995 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2018183995 title "Does Computer-Assisted Surgery Improve Accuracy and Decrease the Learning Curve in Hip Resurfacing? A Radiographic Analysis" @default.
• W2018183995 cites W131144824 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W142496979 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W1964301565 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W1965293623 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W1968571631 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W1974225480 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W1987729781 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W1989306113 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2002332285 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2007653757 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2062859930 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2089572843 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2106947655 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2126092831 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2127054514 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2127260769 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2133847191 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2142582038 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2153862682 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2155023484 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2159488057 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W2409877172 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W3168716211 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W4237588648 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W4253372616 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W4320581067 @default.
• W2018183995 cites W83032723 @default.
• W2018183995 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.h.00697" @default.
• W2018183995 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18676940" @default.
• W2018183995 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2018183995 type Work @default.
• W2018183995 sameAs 2018183995 @default.
• W2018183995 citedByCount "48" @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952012 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952013 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952014 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952015 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952016 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952018 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952019 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952020 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952021 @default.
• W2018183995 countsByYear W20181839952023 @default.
• W2018183995 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2018183995 hasAuthorship W2018183995A5002780074 @default.
• W2018183995 hasAuthorship W2018183995A5058468684 @default.
• W2018183995 hasAuthorship W2018183995A5070624875 @default.
• W2018183995 hasAuthorship W2018183995A5079613318 @default.
• W2018183995 hasAuthorship W2018183995A5080093429 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2775901119 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2776211809 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2776767379 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2780554211 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C2781467495 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C34585555 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C111919701 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C141071460 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2775901119 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2776211809 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2776767379 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2778336525 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2780554211 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2781017183 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2781411149 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C2781467495 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C34585555 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C36454342 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C41008148 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C68312169 @default.
• W2018183995 hasConceptScore W2018183995C71924100 @default.
• W2018183995 hasIssue "Supplement_3" @default.
• W2018183995 hasLocation W20181839951 @default.
• W2018183995 hasLocation W20181839952 @default.
• W2018183995 hasOpenAccess W2018183995 @default.
• W2018183995 hasPrimaryLocation W20181839951 @default.
• W2018183995 hasRelatedWork W1976726647 @default.
• W2018183995 hasRelatedWork W2018183995 @default.
• W2018183995 hasRelatedWork W2037032910 @default.
• W2018183995 hasRelatedWork W2110685361 @default.

• next