Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018199237> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W2018199237 endingPage "186" @default.
- W2018199237 startingPage "180" @default.
- W2018199237 abstract "In radiation therapy practice, portal imaging is a common occurrence. Radiation Oncologists want to be able to view the actual treatment port and compare it to the simulated view for quality assurance. Historically, this has been the domain of oncologists only but with the changes in imaging technology, this area of practice is now more commonly shared with the radiation therapists. Purpose The primary aim of this study was to compare the Radiation Therapists' result versus the Radiation Oncologists' practice of review and verification of electronic portal imaging in the treatment of breast cancer. A secondary result was enhancement of electronic portal imaging use. Methods The study was divided into two parts. Part 1 reviewed imaging of tangential breast treatment and part 2 reviewed mono-isocentric four-field breast technique. The review and verification of the images were conducted by the Radiation Therapists and Radiation Oncologists and their subsequent results were compared. Results Overall the Radiation Oncologist agreed with 96.9% of the images approved by the Radiation Therapists. This makes for a rejection rate of 3.1%. In general, Radiation Therapists adhered to the guidelines more closely than the Radiation Oncologist hence the rejection rate of Radiation Therapists was greater than the Radiation Oncologist by 7.0%. Conclusions The practice of electronic portal imaging review and verification in the treatment of breast cancer can be streamlined and achieved more efficiently. The Radiation Therapists consistently demonstrated their ability to review and verify the portal images, as equivalent to the Radiation Oncologist. Given the high standard of accuracy demonstrated the process of portal image review should be transferred to the Radiation Therapist. This transfer leads to reduction in duplicity of task, an increase in the use of technology, an improvement in efficiencies, and an increase in the quality of care, which will potentially lead to more improvements in delivery of service." @default.
- W2018199237 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2018199237 creator A5036707093 @default.
- W2018199237 date "2007-08-01" @default.
- W2018199237 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2018199237 title "A study into the review and verification of breast images treated with isocentric technique" @default.
- W2018199237 cites W1978124163 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W1984249139 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W1986775333 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2034655492 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2035690207 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2044010024 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2054740632 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2084401014 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2084456226 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2116922748 @default.
- W2018199237 cites W2414234455 @default.
- W2018199237 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2006.02.002" @default.
- W2018199237 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W2018199237 type Work @default.
- W2018199237 sameAs 2018199237 @default.
- W2018199237 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W2018199237 countsByYear W20181992372013 @default.
- W2018199237 countsByYear W20181992372016 @default.
- W2018199237 countsByYear W20181992372022 @default.
- W2018199237 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2018199237 hasAuthorship W2018199237A5036707093 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C2780920918 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C2909208188 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C2992520072 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C121608353 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C126322002 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C126838900 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C19527891 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C201645570 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C2780920918 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C2909208188 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C2989005 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C2992520072 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C509974204 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C530470458 @default.
- W2018199237 hasConceptScore W2018199237C71924100 @default.
- W2018199237 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2018199237 hasLocation W20181992371 @default.
- W2018199237 hasOpenAccess W2018199237 @default.
- W2018199237 hasPrimaryLocation W20181992371 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2019396077 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2149308486 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2399591341 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2512385575 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2590702060 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2788077701 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2884445768 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W2898081876 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W4243853250 @default.
- W2018199237 hasRelatedWork W658440848 @default.
- W2018199237 hasVolume "13" @default.
- W2018199237 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2018199237 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2018199237 magId "2018199237" @default.
- W2018199237 workType "article" @default.