FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018612904> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2018612904 abstract "Background Pragmatic trials compare the effects of different decisions in usual clinical practice. Objectives To develop and evaluate methods to implement simple pragmatic trials using routinely collected electronic health records (EHRs) and recruiting patients at the point of care; to identify the barriers and facilitators for general practitioners (GPs) and patients and the experiences of trial participants. Design Two exemplar randomised trials (Retropro and eLung) with qualitative evaluations. Setting Four hundred and fifty-nine English and Scottish general practices contributing EHRs to a research database, of which 17 participated in the trials. Participants Retropro aimed to recruit 300 patients with hypercholesterolaemia and high cardiovascular risk and eLung aimed to recruit 150 patients with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Interventions Retropro randomised between simvastatin and atorvastatin and eLung between immediate antibiotics and deferred or non-use. eLung recruited during an unscheduled consultation using EHR flagging. Main outcome measure Successful trial completion with implementation of information technology (IT) system for flagging and data processing and documentation of operational and scientific experiences. Data sources EHR research database. Results The governance approval process took over 3 years. A total of 58.8% of the practices (n = 270) expressed interest in participating. The number of interested practices dropped substantially with each stage of the governance process. In Retropro, 6.5% of the practices (n = 30) were eventually approved and 3.7% (n = 17) recruited patients; in eLung, these numbers were 6.8% (n = 31) and 1.3% (n = 6) respectively. Retropro successfully completed recruitment (301 patients) whereas eLung recruited 31 patients. Retropro recruited 20.6% of all statin starters in recruiting practices and 1.1% in the EHR database; the comparable numbers for eLung were 32.3% and 0.9% respectively. The IT system allowed for complex eligibility criteria with central on and off control of recruitment and flagging at a practice. Good Clinical Practice guidelines, governance and consent procedures were found to have substantially affected the intended simple nature of the trials. One qualitative study of 13 clinicians found that clinicians were generally positive about the principle of computerised trial recruitment (flagging during consultation). However, trials which did not include patients with acute illness were favoured. The second qualitative process evaluation interviewed 27 GPs about their actual experiences, including declining, recruiting and non-recruiting GPs. Opportunistic patient recruitment during a routine GP consultation was found to be the most controversial element. The actual experiences of recruiting patients during unscheduled consultation were generally more positive than the hypothetical views of GPs. Several of the recruiting GPs reported the process took 5 minutes and was straightforward and feasible on most occasions. Almost all GPs expressed their strong support for the use of EHRs for trials. Ten eLung participants were interviewed, all of whom considered it acceptable to be recruited during a consultation and to use EHRs for trials. Conclusions EHR point-of-care trials are feasible, although the recruitment of clinicians is a major challenge owing to the complexity of trial approvals. These trials will provide substantial evidence on clinical effectiveness only if trial interventions and participating clinicians and patients are typical of usual clinical care and trials are simple to initiate and conduct. Recommendations for research include the development of evidence and implementation of risk proportionality in trial governance and conduct. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN33113202 and ISRCTN72035428. Funding This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and the Wellcome Trust and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 18, No. 43. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information." @default.
• W2018612904 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5006172018 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5006847944 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5007644417 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5011643757 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5015867292 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5016347038 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5020676107 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5022288501 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5026601382 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5029011020 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5033009437 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5040656075 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5050154916 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5053169119 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5054731282 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5054757405 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5061346775 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5063542803 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5063920391 @default.
• W2018612904 creator A5084355564 @default.
• W2018612904 date "2014-07-01" @default.
• W2018612904 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2018612904 title "The opportunities and challenges of pragmatic point-of-care randomised trials using routinely collected electronic records: evaluations of two exemplar trials" @default.
• W2018612904 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/hta18430" @default.
• W2018612904 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4781625" @default.
• W2018612904 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25011568" @default.
• W2018612904 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2018612904 type Work @default.
• W2018612904 sameAs 2018612904 @default.
• W2018612904 citedByCount "103" @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042014 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042015 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042016 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042017 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042018 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042019 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042020 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042021 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042022 @default.
• W2018612904 countsByYear W20186129042023 @default.
• W2018612904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5006172018 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5006847944 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5007644417 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5011643757 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5015867292 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5016347038 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5020676107 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5022288501 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5026601382 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5029011020 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5033009437 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5040656075 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5050154916 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5053169119 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5054731282 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5054757405 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5061346775 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5063542803 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5063920391 @default.
• W2018612904 hasAuthorship W2018612904A5084355564 @default.
• W2018612904 hasBestOaLocation W20186129041 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C2777548347 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C126322002 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C159110408 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C166957645 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C168563851 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C17744445 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C199360897 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C199539241 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C27415008 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C2777548347 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C2779473830 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C41008148 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C512399662 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C535046627 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C56666940 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C71924100 @default.
• W2018612904 hasConceptScore W2018612904C95457728 @default.
• W2018612904 hasFunder F4320319994 @default.
• W2018612904 hasIssue "43" @default.
• W2018612904 hasLocation W20186129041 @default.
• W2018612904 hasLocation W201861290410 @default.

• next