FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018624196> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2018624196 endingPage "254" @default.
• W2018624196 startingPage "237" @default.
• W2018624196 abstract "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to focus on teacher coachees’ perceptions of why some coaching goals (selected by coaches or coachees) were more achievable than others and how this knowledge might advance a coaching culture that has the potential for sustainable improvements to teaching and learning. Design/methodology/approach – As educators, the authors took a constructivist approach to grounded theory because the authors believe learning is socially constructed. The relationship between coach and coachees is underpinned by their constructed meanings and co-constructed learning. constructivist grounded theory (Charmaz, 1996) requires researchers not to start with a theory or hypothesis but to engage with data in a manner (coding, categorising, theorising) that allows for a theoretical understanding to emerge. In total, 22 teacher coachees from one school participated in this research. They were asked to complete an online questionnaire about their coaching experiences, speculating about why some goals (related to improving student reading, writing, speaking and listening, and math) were more achievable than others. One of the researchers had been a coach in the school, but not at the time of the research. Nonetheless online questionnaires were used as they offered teacher coachees anonymity to share their lived experiences (Charmaz, 2006). This data collection method also assisted in limiting accidental leading by an interviewer (Charmaz, 2006). Findings – The investigation into longitudinal coaching (one to six years) indicated how coachees positioned themselves or peers, when reflecting on and seeking to establish why some coaching goals were more achievable than others. Coachees clustered around one of the following themes: Pragmatic I, Pragmatic We, Student Driven, Team Driven, Data Driven, Research Driven. Theorising within and across themes highlighted that while coachees shared the same concerns, they differed in terms of how much they each focused on them. This allowed the authors to gauge the intensity of the concern (dominate, moderate or slight) for each participant. Notwithstanding the overlap, the seventh theme (temporality) serendipitously aligned with their exposure to coaching. Differentiated models of coaching appears to be a way to establish a coaching culture as multiple models could be responsive to divergent coachees’ learning needs. In doing so it is more likely to support sustainable improvements in teaching and learning. Research limitations/implications – The sample size ( n =22) was appropriate for an in-depth analysis which allowed an understanding of coaching from the coachees’ first-hand experiences although it does limit generalisability. Another limitation is that coachees were not asked about teaching experience, hence the relationship between years of teaching and coaching exposure was not analysed. This is something that the authors feel now needs to be included in further research. Implications of the findings are that instructional coaches within schools may need to be more cognisant of the developmental stages and therefore differentiated needs of teacher coachees. This is particularly so if the aim is to promote sustainable pedagogical improvement. Originality/value – This is a case study of the effects of longitudinal coaching (one to six years) in a school where all teachers are involved in being coached." @default.
• W2018624196 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2018624196 creator A5040272936 @default.
• W2018624196 creator A5075305716 @default.
• W2018624196 date "2014-11-04" @default.
• W2018624196 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2018624196 title "Differentiated coaching: developmental needs of coachees" @default.
• W2018624196 cites W1485259050 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W1990481546 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2000200446 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2001862348 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2013975120 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2033681752 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2044327780 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2052415164 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2058799568 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2090938220 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2097130767 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2098083369 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2105167701 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2161893648 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W2506426656 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W4245013494 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W4249792657 @default.
• W2018624196 cites W621682391 @default.
• W2018624196 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-12-2013-0059" @default.
• W2018624196 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2018624196 type Work @default.
• W2018624196 sameAs 2018624196 @default.
• W2018624196 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2018624196 countsByYear W20186241962016 @default.
• W2018624196 countsByYear W20186241962018 @default.
• W2018624196 countsByYear W20186241962019 @default.
• W2018624196 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2018624196 hasAuthorship W2018624196A5040272936 @default.
• W2018624196 hasAuthorship W2018624196A5075305716 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C133281099 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C156325361 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C2779363792 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C34355311 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C133281099 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C144024400 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C145420912 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C156325361 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C15744967 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C177291462 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C17744445 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C190248442 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C19417346 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C199539241 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C2779363792 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C34355311 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C36289849 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C46312422 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C542102704 @default.
• W2018624196 hasConceptScore W2018624196C94625758 @default.
• W2018624196 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2018624196 hasLocation W20186241961 @default.
• W2018624196 hasOpenAccess W2018624196 @default.
• W2018624196 hasPrimaryLocation W20186241961 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W1901747924 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W2149812194 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W2336626572 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W2492554153 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W2564416750 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W3193024106 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W3195399713 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W3212015867 @default.
• W2018624196 hasRelatedWork W4284697495 @default.
• W2018624196 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2018624196 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2018624196 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2018624196 magId "2018624196" @default.
• W2018624196 workType "article" @default.