Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2018707712> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2018707712 endingPage "21" @default.
- W2018707712 startingPage "1" @default.
- W2018707712 abstract "Radical Conservative Thought in the Intellectual Constellation of the Early Federal Republic Constantin Goschler (bio) In recent years, the history of West Germany after 1945 generally has been told as a success story. Even ardent destroyers of historical master narratives like Konrad Jarausch have chosen book titles like Die Umkehr—meaning “the change” or “reversal”—to describe this period of German history. Such authors have tended to describe the ongoing rise of a liberal civil society in West Germany out of the ashes of the Third Reich. Such optimistic accounts are found not only among historians but also among groups pursuing more directly political objectives in their use of history. In the early days of Operation Iraqi Freedom, the case of West Germany was repeatedly cited as a model for how to overcome a ruthless dictatorship through a combination of military defeat, economic reconstruction, and political re-education (Herf, “Condi Rice”). One even heard calls for an Iraqi Adenauer—while the Iraqi Hitler had long since been identified. As we all know, nothing comparable to the current civil war in Iraq took place in Germany after 1945. The German guerrilla campaign that the SS launched in 1944 under the mythological name “Werewolf” remained a myth. To be sure, top-ranking Nazis took pains to stage their defeat as a Wagnerian Götterdämmerung, and young soldiers who had grown up in the Third Reich continued fighting fanatically for an imaginary final victory (Endsieg)1—among them the later German Nobel Prize winner and author of The Tin Drum, Günther Grass, who recently confessed to having been a seventeen-year-old member of the Waffen SS. For the majority of Germans, however, survival, not suicide, had become the main priority—and the German population adapted quickly to the new situation. Nonetheless, it is worth asking exactly how the mental transformations that followed [End Page 1] the German military defeat occurred and what these transformations meant in the long run for the intellectual life of the Federal Republic. In order to understand Germany’s post-1945 transformation, it is necessary to examine the role played by radical conservative intellectuals like Martin Heidegger, Carl Schmitt, and Ernst Jünger. This is especially true with respect to shifts in our historical perspective that have occurred during the past few decades. For many years, mutually incompatible accounts of a “new beginning after 1945” on the one hand and of a “restoration after 1945” on the other hand tended to clash unproductively. More recently, historians have started to look at the 1950s as a more ambiguous period. This fresh perspective has led to interpretations of the 1950s as an age of “modernization under conservative auspices” (Klessmann, Zwei Staaten, Die doppelte Staats-gründung). Apparently, radical conservative intellectuals played an important role in the emergence of what might be called “the German way to modernity” after 1945, figuring both as subjects and as objects of this process (Schildt, Zwischen Abendland, Konservatismus, Moderne Zeiten, “Ende der Ideologien”; Laak, “Trotz und Nachurteil,” “Nach dem Sturm,” Gespräche; Lenk, Deutscher Konservativismus). When one examines debates about Heidegger, Schmitt, and Jünger’s role in the Federal Republic after 1945, it becomes obvious that writing about these thinkers has rarely been a purely scholarly endeavor. On the contrary, political interests have always played a large role. The main motivating factor has been fear about the possibility of reactionary political developments in West Germany. Justifiably or not, some authors have worried about the nefarious influence notorious right-wing thinkers like Schmitt, Jünger, and Heidegger might exert on West German intellectual life (Grebing, Konservatismus). Such an approach is based on the assumptions that these thinkers’ radical conservative ideas could once again become dangerous and that the West German liberal and democratic order is fundamentally unstable. Other authors have sought to discredit German postwar conservatism as a whole by pointing to the allegedly intimate connections between mainstream conservatives and the lunatic fringe represented by Heidegger, Schmitt, and Jünger (Leggewie, Der Geist). Our interest in Heidegger, Schmitt, and Jünger should not, however, be based on a desire to uncover the dirty little secrets of contemporary German conservatism (Hacke, Philosophie). Instead, we..." @default.
- W2018707712 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2018707712 creator A5082915272 @default.
- W2018707712 date "2008-01-01" @default.
- W2018707712 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2018707712 title "Radical Conservative Thought in the Intellectual Constellation of the Early Federal Republic" @default.
- W2018707712 cites W11983175 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1488131112 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1515951938 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1543197308 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1545012707 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1548922117 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1562197610 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1579700602 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1590955817 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1594926905 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1601420768 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1748660659 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W1989451089 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2019965221 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2023239695 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2031548136 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2058796047 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2062558945 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2131522476 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2475868132 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2481361595 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2612731690 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W2778262648 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W371538433 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W384521078 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W411479223 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W418987723 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W564109386 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W566645159 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W568253641 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W575022422 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W581435352 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W598855752 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W612566383 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W625765502 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W644814578 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W648448528 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W652171862 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W653037880 @default.
- W2018707712 cites W654395465 @default.
- W2018707712 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.0.0002" @default.
- W2018707712 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2018707712 type Work @default.
- W2018707712 sameAs 2018707712 @default.
- W2018707712 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2018707712 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2018707712 hasAuthorship W2018707712A5082915272 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C121578661 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C2779220109 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C48327123 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C519517224 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C5616717 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C6303427 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C81631423 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C121578661 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C154775046 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C166957645 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C17744445 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C199539241 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C2779220109 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C48327123 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C519517224 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C555826173 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C5616717 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C6303427 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C74916050 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C81631423 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C94625758 @default.
- W2018707712 hasConceptScore W2018707712C95457728 @default.
- W2018707712 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2018707712 hasLocation W20187077121 @default.
- W2018707712 hasOpenAccess W2018707712 @default.
- W2018707712 hasPrimaryLocation W20187077121 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W1909663534 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W2070085653 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W2118105896 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W2153664550 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W2363229451 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W2548745594 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W2996784758 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W3005937258 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W3121654762 @default.
- W2018707712 hasRelatedWork W3146706151 @default.
- W2018707712 hasVolume "69" @default.